Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Maywood Ip Law

Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

13 pending office actions • 9 clients • 12 examiners • 6 art units • 0 of 13 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 31 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Maywood IP Law handles Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering matters and has 558 career applications. Its profile includes 15 pending office actions and an 89.63% resolved allowance rate, indicating that allowance was the outcome for most resolved applications.

The average of 3.2 office actions per allowance shows that successful resolution commonly involved multiple examination actions. The profile therefore combines a moderate application history with ongoing work and a record of generally favorable resolved outcomes.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=558 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

89.6%
Allowance Rate
n=558
+0.53σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=558
3.2
OAs to Allowance
n=294
-0.25σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=294
993 days
Time to Allowance
n=294
+8.2pp
Interview Lift
n=558
25.9%
RCE Rate
n=558
0.8%
Appeal Rate
n=558

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

70.6%
§101 Overcome
n=34
78.5%
§102 Overcome
n=205
75.2%
§103 Overcome
n=222
81.2%
§112 Overcome
n=154

Specialization & Scale

A61B, A61F, A61M
Top CPC Subclasses
69%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=558
4
Practitioners
n=558
139.5
Apps / Practitioner
n=558

Portfolio Summary

13
Total Pending OAs
8
Non-Final OAs
5
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 7 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

2
Overdue
0
Due this week
4
Due this month
1
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 7 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (2)Due ≤ 30 days (4)Due ≤ 60 days (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

7
Hard (54%)
6
Medium (46%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only4 (31%)
§102 only1 (8%)
Double-patenting + other1 (8%)
Multi-statute (no §101)7 (54%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
13
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

130 h
Manual time on pending OAs
26 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
46 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
1.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
SIPP, AMY R. 2 71.1% +26.0%
MANGINE, HEATHER N 1 47.1% +65.0%
LE, KHOA TAN 1 75.4% +41.7%
WEISS, JESSICA 1 81.0% +32.8%
YANG, ANDREW 1 84.3% +10.4%
BECCIA, CHRISTOPHER J 1 83.5% +14.0%
JOHANAS, JACQUELINE T 1 63.9% +29.9%
STEWART, ALVIN J 1 82.2% +0.8%
MERENE, JAN CHRISTOP L 1 68.5% +48.1%
COLEY, ZADE JAMES 1 72.3% +26.0%

Quick Wins (3)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18922323 ADDITIVE MANUFACTURED TITANIUM BONE DEVICE BECCIA, CHRISTOPHER J 26d
19082908 SACROILIAC JOINT STABILIZATION SYSTEMS AND METHODS YANG, ANDREW —
18431954 KNEE PROSTHESIS STEWART, ALVIN J —

Hard Cases (7)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 7 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18418251 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR SURGICAL THREE-DIMENSIONAL MAPPING AND PATH DETERMINATION MERENE, JAN CHRISTOP L 77d overdue
19067949 FRACTURE PLATING SYSTEMS AND METHODS SIPP, AMY R. 8d
18372410 ANKLE ARTHROPLASTY DEVICES, SYSTEMS, AND METHODS PELLEGRINO, BRIAN E 15d
18919185 INTERBODY SPACER AND BONE PLATE ASSEMBLY JOHANAS, JACQUELINE T 27d
18125626 SYNDESMOSIS TENSIONING INSTRUMENTS, IMPLANTS, SYSTEMS, AND METHODS SIPP, AMY R. 57d
19370658 GAIT MODIFICATION SYSTEMS AND METHODS MANGINE, HEATHER N —
19183300 MEDIAL COLLATERAL LIGAMENT RETRACTOR SYSTEMS AND METHODS WEISS, JESSICA —

Interview Candidates (10)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18418251 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR SURGICAL THREE-DIMENSIONAL MAPPING AND PATH DETERMINATION MERENE, JAN CHRISTOP L 77d overdue
19067949 FRACTURE PLATING SYSTEMS AND METHODS SIPP, AMY R. 8d
18922323 ADDITIVE MANUFACTURED TITANIUM BONE DEVICE BECCIA, CHRISTOPHER J 26d
18919185 INTERBODY SPACER AND BONE PLATE ASSEMBLY JOHANAS, JACQUELINE T 27d
18125626 SYNDESMOSIS TENSIONING INSTRUMENTS, IMPLANTS, SYSTEMS, AND METHODS SIPP, AMY R. 57d
19370658 GAIT MODIFICATION SYSTEMS AND METHODS MANGINE, HEATHER N —
19211200 TENDON REPAIR SYSTEM LE, KHOA TAN —
19183300 MEDIAL COLLATERAL LIGAMENT RETRACTOR SYSTEMS AND METHODS WEISS, JESSICA —

Client Portfolio (9 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
37755
37733
37992
37321
37711
37741

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19370658 GAIT MODIFICATION SYSTEMS AND METHODS Scientific Motion Technologies, Inc. MANGINE, HEATHER N 3732 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 27, 2025
19211200 TENDON REPAIR SYSTEM Catalyst Orthoscience Inc. LE, KHOA TAN 3771 §103Other Non-Final OA — Pending May 18, 2025
19183300 MEDIAL COLLATERAL LIGAMENT RETRACTOR SYSTEMS AND METHODS Optimotion Implants LLC WEISS, JESSICA 3775 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 18, 2025
19082908 SACROILIAC JOINT STABILIZATION SYSTEMS AND METHODS Flospine, LLC YANG, ANDREW 3773 §102 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 18, 2025
19067949 FRACTURE PLATING SYSTEMS AND METHODS Costa Surgical Inc. SIPP, AMY R. 3775 §102§103 Final Rejection 8d Pending Mar 02, 2025
18922323 ADDITIVE MANUFACTURED TITANIUM BONE DEVICE Ht Medical, LLC BECCIA, CHRISTOPHER J 3775 §103 Final Rejection 26d Pending Oct 21, 2024
18919185 INTERBODY SPACER AND BONE PLATE ASSEMBLY Lincotek Medical LLC JOHANAS, JACQUELINE T 3773 §102§103 Final Rejection 27d Pending Oct 17, 2024
18431954 KNEE PROSTHESIS Optimotion Implants LLC STEWART, ALVIN J 3799 §102§112DP Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 03, 2024
18418251 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR SURGICAL THREE-DIMENSIONAL MAPPING AND PATH DETERMINATION Ht Medical, LLC MERENE, JAN CHRISTOP L 3773 §103§112 Non-Final OA 77d overdue Pending Jan 20, 2024
18375485 CANNULATED CONTINUOUS COMPRESSION SCREW UNIVERSITY OF UTAH RESEARCH FOUNDATION COLEY, ZADE JAMES 3775 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Sep 30, 2023
18372410 ANKLE ARTHROPLASTY DEVICES, SYSTEMS, AND METHODS Vilex LLC PELLEGRINO, BRIAN E 3799 §103§112 Final Rejection 15d Pending Sep 25, 2023
18125626 SYNDESMOSIS TENSIONING INSTRUMENTS, IMPLANTS, SYSTEMS, AND METHODS Vilex LLC SIPP, AMY R. 3775 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA 57d Pending Mar 23, 2023
17322226 OFFSET REAMERS Catalyst Orthoscience Inc. HU, ANN M 3774 §103 Non-Final OA 5d overdue Pending May 17, 2021

Managing Maywood Ip Law's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Maywood Ip Law's patent allowance rate?

89.6% of resolved applications prosecuted by Maywood Ip Law were allowed, across 558 applications in USPTO records.

How many office actions does Maywood Ip Law average before allowance?

3.20 office actions per allowed application on average.

How many pending office actions does Maywood Ip Law have?

13 pending office actions as of October 2026, for 9 clients, before 12 examiners in 6 art units.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month