Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Mbhb - Spotify

Technology areas: Computing & Software • Networking & Security • Communications

7 pending office actions • 1 client • 7 examiners • 6 art units • 0 of 7 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 16 patents granted in the last 365 days

Quality Metrics (n=372 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

97.5%
Allowance Rate
n=372
+0.69σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=372
3.7
OAs to Allowance
n=316
-0.05σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=316
892 days
Time to Allowance
n=316
+0.1pp
Interview Lift
n=372
42.6%
RCE Rate
n=372
1.1%
Appeal Rate
n=372

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

86.3%
§101 Overcome
n=73
90.6%
§102 Overcome
n=127
91.0%
§103 Overcome
n=244
94.4%
§112 Overcome
n=89

Specialization & Scale

G06F, G10L, H04N
Top CPC Subclasses
52%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=372
0
Practitioners
n=372
—
Apps / Practitioner
n=372 (min 20)

Portfolio Summary

7
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
5
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
2
Due this month
1
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Due ≤ 30 days (2)Due ≤ 60 days (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

3
Hard (43%)
4
Medium (57%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 only1 (14%)
§101 + other2 (29%)
§103 only4 (57%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
4
Information Tech
57% of docket
2
Communications
29% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
1
Business / Other
14% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

70 h
Manual time on pending OAs
14 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
24 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.6 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
NGUYEN, CAM LINH T 1 83.9% +13.4%
CRESPO FEBLES, HECTOR J 1 100.0% +0.0%
HERZOG, MADHURI R 1 78.3% +12.4%
WASAFF, JOHN S. 1 33.8% +44.0%
PHAM, JESSICA THUY 1 18.2% +90.0%
CHOWDHURY, NIGAR 1 69.0% +16.9%
CHAVEZ, RODRIGO A 1 52.5% +38.0%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19039572 Human-Machine Interfaces for Utterance-Based Playlist Selection CRESPO FEBLES, HECTOR J —

Hard Cases (3)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18056101 CONTRASTIVE EMBEDDING OF STRUCTURED SPACE FOR BAYESIAN OPTIMIZATION PHAM, JESSICA THUY 28d
19090827 Media Content Item Recommendation System NGUYEN, CAM LINH T —
18589139 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DONOR SELECTION FOR SYNTHETIC CONTROL MODELS WASAFF, JOHN S. —

Interview Candidates (6)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 6 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17898191 GROUP LISTENING SESSION DISCOVERY CHOWDHURY, NIGAR 9d
18056101 CONTRASTIVE EMBEDDING OF STRUCTURED SPACE FOR BAYESIAN OPTIMIZATION PHAM, JESSICA THUY 28d
17584512 SERVER-BASED FALSE WAKE WORD DETECTION CHAVEZ, RODRIGO A 34d
19090827 Media Content Item Recommendation System NGUYEN, CAM LINH T —
18976868 Access Control for On-Device Machine Learning Models HERZOG, MADHURI R —
18589139 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DONOR SELECTION FOR SYNTHETIC CONTROL MODELS WASAFF, JOHN S. —

Client Portfolio (1 client)

Client (Assignee)Pending OAs
Spotify AB 7

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
21611
26531
24381
21211
24841
26581

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19090827 Media Content Item Recommendation System Spotify AB NGUYEN, CAM LINH T 2161 §101Other Final Rejection — Pending Mar 26, 2025
19039572 Human-Machine Interfaces for Utterance-Based Playlist Selection Spotify AB CRESPO FEBLES, HECTOR J 2653 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 28, 2025
18976868 Access Control for On-Device Machine Learning Models Spotify AB HERZOG, MADHURI R 2438 §103Other Final Rejection — Pending Dec 11, 2024
18589139 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DONOR SELECTION FOR SYNTHETIC CONTROL MODELS Spotify AB WASAFF, JOHN S. §101§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 27, 2024
18056101 CONTRASTIVE EMBEDDING OF STRUCTURED SPACE FOR BAYESIAN OPTIMIZATION Spotify AB PHAM, JESSICA THUY 2121 §101§103§112 Final Rejection 28d Pending Nov 16, 2022
17898191 GROUP LISTENING SESSION DISCOVERY Spotify AB CHOWDHURY, NIGAR 2484 §103 Final Rejection 9d Pending Aug 29, 2022
17584512 SERVER-BASED FALSE WAKE WORD DETECTION Spotify AB CHAVEZ, RODRIGO A 2658 §103 Final Rejection 34d Pending Jan 26, 2022

Managing Mbhb - Spotify's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month