Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026

Mbhb - Spotify

6 pending office actions • 1 client • 6 examiners • 3 art units • 0 of 6 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 17 patents granted in the last 365 days

Quality Metrics (n=369 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

97.8%
Allowance Rate
n=369
+0.68σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=369
3.7
OAs to Allowance
n=314
-0.06σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=314
889 days
Time to Allowance
n=314
+0.8pp
Interview Lift
n=369
43.0%
RCE Rate
n=369
0.9%
Appeal Rate
n=369

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

§101 Overcome
n=19 (min 20)
87.0%
§102 Overcome
n=46
92.9%
§103 Overcome
n=224
§112 Overcome
n=15 (min 20)

Specialization & Scale

G06F, G10L, H04N
Top CPC Subclasses
52%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=369
0
Practitioners
n=369
Apps / Practitioner
n=369 (min 20)

Portfolio Summary

6
Total Pending OAs
4
Non-Final OAs
2
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
4
Medium (67%)
2
Easy (33%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only4 (67%)
Double-patenting only2 (33%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
2
Information Tech
33% of docket
1
Communications
17% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
3
Business / Other
50% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

60 h
Manual time on pending OAs
12 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
21 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.5 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
LAZARO, DAVID R 1 86.9% +3.6%
WONG, LINDA 1 85.1% +15.5%
ORTIZ SANCHEZ, MICHAEL 1 66.9% +28.0%
VILLENA, MARK 1 70.7% +15.3%
DAUD, ABDULLAH AHMED 1 55.2% +31.3%
PHAM, JESSICA THUY 1 14.3% +0.0%

Quick Wins (2)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19084689 Device Discovery for Social Playback LAZARO, DAVID R
18982868 Systems and Methods for Improving Fulfillment of Media Content Related Requests via Utterance-Based Human-Machine Interfaces WONG, LINDA

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18056101 CONTRASTIVE EMBEDDING OF STRUCTURED SPACE FOR BAYESIAN OPTIMIZATION PHAM, JESSICA THUY 28d

Interview Candidates (4)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18057017 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR SELECTING MEDIA CONTENT DAUD, ABDULLAH AHMED 16d overdue
18982868 Systems and Methods for Improving Fulfillment of Media Content Related Requests via Utterance-Based Human-Machine Interfaces WONG, LINDA
18956913 Singing Voice Separation with Deep U-Net Convolutional Networks ORTIZ SANCHEZ, MICHAEL
18090105 Voice Assistant Controller VILLENA, MARK

Client Portfolio (1 client)

Client (Assignee)Pending OAs
Spotify AB 6

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
26581
21641
21211

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19084689 Device Discovery for Social Playback Spotify AB LAZARO, DAVID R DP Non-Final OA Pending Mar 19, 2025
18982868 Systems and Methods for Improving Fulfillment of Media Content Related Requests via Utterance-Based Human-Machine Interfaces Spotify AB WONG, LINDA DP Non-Final OA Pending Dec 16, 2024
18956913 Singing Voice Separation with Deep U-Net Convolutional Networks Spotify AB ORTIZ SANCHEZ, MICHAEL §103 Non-Final OA Pending Nov 22, 2024
18090105 Voice Assistant Controller Spotify AB VILLENA, MARK 2658 §103 Non-Final OA Pending Dec 28, 2022
18057017 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR SELECTING MEDIA CONTENT Spotify AB DAUD, ABDULLAH AHMED 2164 §103 Final Rejection 16d overdue Pending Nov 18, 2022
18056101 CONTRASTIVE EMBEDDING OF STRUCTURED SPACE FOR BAYESIAN OPTIMIZATION Spotify AB PHAM, JESSICA THUY 2121 §103 Final Rejection 28d Pending Nov 16, 2022

Managing Mbhb - Spotify's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month