Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Mbhb - Waymo

Technology areas: Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

33 pending office actions • 2 clients • 30 examiners • 17 art units • 7 of 33 (21%) have an AI response strategy ready • 71 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

This profile covers Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems and includes 1277 career applications. The resolved allowance rate is 97.36%, while the average is 2.76 office actions per allowance. The record therefore combines a high reported allowance outcome with fewer examination actions on average before allowance.

The profile shows 31 pending office actions, indicating a material active workload in addition to the historical record. For practitioners, the figures support a prosecution approach that preserves the strong allowance results while addressing the remaining matters efficiently. The action average provides useful context for response planning, because the reported cases that reached allowance generally did so without as many office-action events as the profile’s other historical measure might suggest.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=1277 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

97.4%
Allowance Rate
n=1277
+0.59σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=1277
2.8
OAs to Allowance
n=1034
-0.29σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=1034
875 days
Time to Allowance
n=1034
+0.8pp
Interview Lift
n=1277
21.8%
RCE Rate
n=1277
2.5%
Appeal Rate
n=1277

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

86.6%
§101 Overcome
n=82
89.2%
§102 Overcome
n=335
88.7%
§103 Overcome
n=646
91.0%
§112 Overcome
n=232

Specialization & Scale

G01S, B60W, G05D
Top CPC Subclasses
41%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=1277
0
Practitioners
n=1277
—
Apps / Practitioner
n=1277 (min 20)

Portfolio Summary

33
Total Pending OAs
21
Non-Final OAs
10
Final Rejections
2
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 7 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

3
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
2
Due in next 60 days
1
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 7 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (3)Due ≤ 30 days (1)Due ≤ 60 days (2)Due later (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

8
Hard (24%)
18
Medium (55%)
4
Easy (12%)
3
Unknown (9%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other3 (9%)
§103 only15 (45%)
§102 only1 (3%)
Double-patenting only4 (12%)
Double-patenting + other2 (6%)
Multi-statute (no §101)5 (15%)
No statute on record3 (9%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
1
Information Tech
3% of docket
2
Communications
6% of docket
8
Semiconductors
24% of docket
20
Mechanical / Eng
61% of docket
2
Business / Other
6% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

330 h
Manual time on pending OAs
66 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
115 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
2.9 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
HELLNER, MARK 2 90.4% +8.6%
BAGHDASARYAN, HOVHANNES 2 77.3% +16.9%
HULKA, JAMES R 2 76.3% +11.9%
DUNNE, KENNETH MICHAEL 1 77.2% +10.5%
LUU, THANH X 1 78.3% +10.2%
BENNETT, JENNIFER D 1 73.6% +18.2%
ALAM, NAEEM TASLIM 1 83.3% +10.6%
HANSEN, JONATHAN M 1 79.4% +11.5%
TANINGCO, MARCUS H 1 81.0% +6.6%
PEREZ, ANGELICA 1 75.4% +27.5%

Quick Wins (3)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19052077 Impact Resistant Heated Window Mount for Thermal Camera TANINGCO, MARCUS H —
18959920 Systems and Methods for Occlusion Detection HELLNER, MARK —
18779594 Light Detection using an Aperture HELLNER, MARK —

Hard Cases (8)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18924713 Reporting Road Event Data and Sharing with Other Vehicles SLOWIK, ELIZABETH J 33d
18929174 Positioning Vehicles to Improve Quality of Observations at Intersections SOOFI, YAZAN A 41d
19236021 AUTO-EXPOSURE OCCLUSION CAMERA LUU, THANH X —
19220715 Methods and Systems for Adjusting Vehicle Behavior based on Estimated Unintentional Lateral Movements ALAM, NAEEM TASLIM —
18955396 Methods and Systems for Real-time Automotive Radar Sensor Validation GUYAH, REMASH RAJA —
18930591 Methods and Systems for Radar Reflection Filtering During Vehicle Navigation MOORE, WHITNEY —
18812269 Automated Generation of Radar Interference Reduction Training Data for Autonomous Vehicle Systems MAKHDOOM, SAMARINA —
18063067 Laser Protection Methods NIU, XINNING —

Interview Candidates (10)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19251112 Methods and Systems for Automatic Introspective Perception DUNNE, KENNETH MICHAEL —
19236021 AUTO-EXPOSURE OCCLUSION CAMERA LUU, THANH X —
19229684 SELECTIVE DEACTIVATION OF LIGHT EMITTERS FOR INTERFERENCE MITIGATION IN LIGHT DETECTION AND RANGING (LIDAR) DEVICES BENNETT, JENNIFER D —
19220715 Methods and Systems for Adjusting Vehicle Behavior based on Estimated Unintentional Lateral Movements ALAM, NAEEM TASLIM —
19199050 Static Dome Assembly for LiDAR Systems HANSEN, JONATHAN M —
18999012 Systems and Methods for Data Communication via a Rotary Link PEREZ, ANGELICA —
18895206 Rotatable Mirror Device BAGHDASARYAN, HOVHANNES —
18828363 Methods and Systems for Dithering Active Sensor Pulse Emissions BAGHDASARYAN, HOVHANNES —

Client Portfolio (2 clients)

Client (Assignee)Pending OAs
WAYMO LLC 32
Waymo, LLC 1

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
36458
28843
36612
28782
36682
36482
36632
28771
26491
21121

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19251112 Methods and Systems for Automatic Introspective Perception Waymo LLC DUNNE, KENNETH MICHAEL 3661 §103DP Final Rejection — Pending Jun 26, 2025
19236021 AUTO-EXPOSURE OCCLUSION CAMERA Waymo LLC LUU, THANH X 2878 §102§103 Final Rejection — Pending Jun 12, 2025
19229684 SELECTIVE DEACTIVATION OF LIGHT EMITTERS FOR INTERFERENCE MITIGATION IN LIGHT DETECTION AND RANGING (LIDAR) DEVICES Waymo LLC BENNETT, JENNIFER D Other Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 05, 2025
19220715 Methods and Systems for Adjusting Vehicle Behavior based on Estimated Unintentional Lateral Movements Waymo LLC ALAM, NAEEM TASLIM 3668 §101§102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending May 28, 2025
19199050 Static Dome Assembly for LiDAR Systems Waymo LLC HANSEN, JONATHAN M 2877 §103Other Non-Final OA — Pending May 05, 2025
19052077 Impact Resistant Heated Window Mount for Thermal Camera Waymo LLC TANINGCO, MARCUS H 2884 DP Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 12, 2025
18999012 Systems and Methods for Data Communication via a Rotary Link Waymo LLC PEREZ, ANGELICA 2649 §103Other Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 23, 2024
18989086 Low-Overhead, Bidirectional Error Checking for a Serial Peripheral Interface Waymo LLC BRADEN, GRACE VICTORIA 2112 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Dec 20, 2024
18978766 Pedestrian Countdown Signal Classification to Increase Pedestrian Behavior Legibility Waymo LLC BITAR, NANCY 2664 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 12, 2024
18959920 Systems and Methods for Occlusion Detection Waymo LLC HELLNER, MARK 3645 §103DP Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 26, 2024
18959357 Monolithic Silicon Photomultiplier Array Waymo LLC WILLIAMS, DON J 2878 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Nov 25, 2024
18955396 Methods and Systems for Real-time Automotive Radar Sensor Validation Waymo LLC GUYAH, REMASH RAJA 3648 §103§112Other Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 21, 2024
18930591 Methods and Systems for Radar Reflection Filtering During Vehicle Navigation Waymo LLC MOORE, WHITNEY 3646 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 29, 2024
18929174 Positioning Vehicles to Improve Quality of Observations at Intersections Waymo LLC SOOFI, YAZAN A 3668 §101§102 Non-Final OA 41d Pending Oct 28, 2024
18924713 Reporting Road Event Data and Sharing with Other Vehicles Waymo LLC SLOWIK, ELIZABETH J 3662 §101§102§103 Final Rejection 33d AI Ready Oct 23, 2024
18921915 Systems, Methods, and Apparatus for using Remote Assistance to Annotate Images of an Environment Waymo LLC MILLER, PRESTON JAY 3661 §103 Non-Final OA — AI Ready Oct 21, 2024
18918915 Programmable SiPM Arrays Waymo LLC FAYE, MAMADOU 2884 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Oct 17, 2024
18917449 Optical Signal Routing Devices and Systems Waymo LLC MOONEY, MICHAEL P 2874 DP Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 16, 2024
18895206 Rotatable Mirror Device Waymo, LLC BAGHDASARYAN, HOVHANNES Other Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 24, 2024
18889024 Remote Assistance for an Autonomous Vehicle in Low Confidence Situations Waymo LLC ANWARI, MACEEH 3663 §102 Final Rejection 8d overdue AI Ready Sep 18, 2024
18828363 Methods and Systems for Dithering Active Sensor Pulse Emissions Waymo LLC BAGHDASARYAN, HOVHANNES 3645 §103Other Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 09, 2024
18812269 Automated Generation of Radar Interference Reduction Training Data for Autonomous Vehicle Systems Waymo LLC MAKHDOOM, SAMARINA 3648 §102§103 Final Rejection — Pending Aug 22, 2024
18794511 Methods for Localizing Light Detection and Ranging (Lidar) Calibration Targets Waymo LLC NOEL, JEMPSON 3645 §103Other Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 05, 2024
18779594 Light Detection using an Aperture Waymo LLC HELLNER, MARK 3645 DP Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 22, 2024
18768646 Methods and Systems for Detecting Adverse Road Conditions using Radar Waymo LLC WHITTINGTON, JESS G 3666 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Jul 10, 2024
18760933 Systems and Methods for Infrared Sensing Waymo LLC DOWNING, SAVANNAH STARR 2884 Other Non-Final OA 14d AI Ready Jul 01, 2024
18600967 Crosstalk Reduction for Light Detection and Ranging (Lidar) Devices Using Wavelength Locking Waymo LLC AHMAD, KHALIL ALI 3645 DP Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 11, 2024
18522719 SiPM with Cells of Different Sizes Waymo LLC HULKA, JAMES R 3645 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 29, 2023
18517438 Universal Spectrum Utilization Exchange for Radio Frequency Interference Mitigation and Avoidance Waymo LLC LEITE, PAULO ROBERTO GONZ 3663 §103 Non-Final OA 5d overdue Pending Nov 22, 2023
18064612 Methods and Systems for Providing Remote Assistance to an Autonomous Vehicle Waymo LLC CASTRO, PAUL A 3658 §103 Final Rejection 79d overdue AI Ready Dec 12, 2022
18063067 Laser Protection Methods Waymo LLC NIU, XINNING 2828 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 07, 2022
17930441 Temporally Modulated Light Emission for Defect Detection in Light Detection and Ranging (Lidar) Devices and Cameras Waymo LLC HULKA, JAMES R 3645 §103 Non-Final OA — AI Ready Sep 08, 2022
17662239 Mitigating Crosstalk from High-Intensity Returns in a Light Detection and Ranging (Lidar) Device Waymo LLC XIAO, YUQING 3645 §103 Non-Final OA 70d AI Ready May 06, 2022

Managing Mbhb - Waymo's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Mbhb - Waymo's patent allowance rate?

97.4% of resolved applications prosecuted by Mbhb - Waymo were allowed, across 1,277 applications in USPTO records.

How many office actions does Mbhb - Waymo average before allowance?

2.76 office actions per allowed application on average.

How many pending office actions does Mbhb - Waymo have?

33 pending office actions as of October 2026, for 2 clients, before 30 examiners in 17 art units.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month