Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Mccarter & English, LLP Wilmington

Technology area: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals

11 pending office actions • 11 clients • 11 examiners • 11 art units • 0 of 11 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 6 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

This profile covers Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals and includes 576 career applications. The resolved allowance rate is 77.09%, and the average is 3.87 office actions per allowance. The record shows a moderate application base, an allowance outcome for a majority of resolved matters, and repeated examination activity before allowance.

The profile contains 12 pending office actions. Practitioners can use the historical figures to frame prosecution planning, while recognizing that the reported allowance outcome does not resolve the current matters. The action average indicates that responses may require sustained engagement with the examiner, making claim strategy and timely issue resolution important for the active biotechnology and pharmaceutical docket.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=576 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

77.1%
Allowance Rate
n=576
+0.76σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=576
3.9
OAs to Allowance
n=313
-0.03σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=313
1036 days
Time to Allowance
n=313
+16.0pp
Interview Lift
n=576
30.3%
RCE Rate
n=576
1.0%
Appeal Rate
n=576

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

77.6%
§101 Overcome
n=58
73.8%
§102 Overcome
n=168
74.4%
§103 Overcome
n=270
77.4%
§112 Overcome
n=221

Specialization & Scale

A61K, C12N, A61P
Top CPC Subclasses
20%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=576
0
Practitioners
n=576
—
Apps / Practitioner
n=576 (min 20)

Portfolio Summary

11
Total Pending OAs
9
Non-Final OAs
2
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

2
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
1
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (2)Due ≤ 30 days (1)Due later (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

6
Hard (55%)
4
Medium (36%)
1
Easy (9%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 only1 (9%)
§101 + other1 (9%)
§103 only3 (27%)
Double-patenting only1 (9%)
Double-patenting + other1 (9%)
Multi-statute (no §101)4 (36%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

7
Life Sciences
64% of docket
1
Information Tech
9% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
1
Semiconductors
9% of docket
2
Mechanical / Eng
18% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

110 h
Manual time on pending OAs
22 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
38 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
1.0 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
BROOME, SHARRIEF I 1 81.5% +4.5%
GRAHAM, CHANTEL LORAN 1 71.8% +11.5%
DAVIS, RUTH A 1 60.9% +31.0%
MISIASZEK, AMBER ALTSCHUL 1 46.8% +24.0%
CLEMMONS, STEVE M 1 69.7% +20.9%
ALLEY, GENEVIEVE S 1 60.5% +48.3%
MERTZ, PREMA MARIA 1 71.8% +34.6%
RIEGLER, PATRICK F 1 55.3% +30.9%
SAEED, ALI S 1 31.6% +33.8%
MORNHINWEG, JEFFREY P 1 36.7% +32.2%

Hard Cases (6)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 6 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18411752 Engine, System, and Method of Providing Automated Risk Mitigation RIEGLER, PATRICK F 49d overdue
16625877 KIT FOR EVALUATING GENE MUTATION RELATED TO MYELOPROLIFERATIVE TUMOR SALMON, KATHERINE D 14d
18711261 METHODS FOR INTRATUMORAL DELIVERY OF CRISPR/CAS SYSTEMS ALLEY, GENEVIEVE S 69d
18997270 LIGHT-CANCELLING ARTICLE AND PROJECTION APPARATUS BROOME, SHARRIEF I —
18919303 EVALUATING TOPIC TREATMENT IN ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS MISIASZEK, AMBER ALTSCHUL —
18368599 COMPOSITIONS COMPRISING AND METHODS OF USING 1,3-PROPANEDIOL, TO IMPROVE SWEETNESS AND/OR REDUCE BITTERNESS OF SWEETENERS MORNHINWEG, JEFFREY P —

Interview Candidates (9)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18411752 Engine, System, and Method of Providing Automated Risk Mitigation RIEGLER, PATRICK F 49d overdue
18512349 DROPROPIZINE IN COMBINATION WITH AMBROXOL IN THE DOSAGE FORM OF SYRUP AND TABLETS SAEED, ALI S 31d overdue
18711261 METHODS FOR INTRATUMORAL DELIVERY OF CRISPR/CAS SYSTEMS ALLEY, GENEVIEVE S 69d
18948419 MICROWAVE-ASSISTED CATALYTIC PYROLYSIS PROCESS AND REACTOR FOR SELECTIVELY CONVERTING ADDITIVE-CONTAINING PLASTIC TO ALKENES AND ALKANES GRAHAM, CHANTEL LORAN —
18865479 PROBIOTIC COMPOSITIONS FOR THE TREATMENT OF ALOPECIA DAVIS, RUTH A —
18919303 EVALUATING TOPIC TREATMENT IN ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS MISIASZEK, AMBER ALTSCHUL —
18785017 SKATEBOARD TRUCK ASSEMBLY CLEMMONS, STEVE M —
18597286 METHODS OF TREATING ATOPIC DERMATITIS MERTZ, PREMA MARIA —

Client Portfolio (11 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
28721
17711
16991
36821
36131
16171
16461
21711
16161
17931

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18997270 LIGHT-CANCELLING ARTICLE AND PROJECTION APPARATUS Holotronica Limited BROOME, SHARRIEF I 2872 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 21, 2025
18948419 MICROWAVE-ASSISTED CATALYTIC PYROLYSIS PROCESS AND REACTOR FOR SELECTIVELY CONVERTING ADDITIVE-CONTAINING PLASTIC TO ALKENES AND ALKANES UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE GRAHAM, CHANTEL LORAN 1771 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 14, 2024
18865479 PROBIOTIC COMPOSITIONS FOR THE TREATMENT OF ALOPECIA Bioithas S.L. DAVIS, RUTH A 1699 §102§103§112DP Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 13, 2024
18919303 EVALUATING TOPIC TREATMENT IN ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS Highspot, Inc. MISIASZEK, AMBER ALTSCHUL 3682 §101 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 17, 2024
18785017 SKATEBOARD TRUCK ASSEMBLY Djll Holdings, LLC CLEMMONS, STEVE M 3613 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Jul 26, 2024
18711261 METHODS FOR INTRATUMORAL DELIVERY OF CRISPR/CAS SYSTEMS Christiana Care Gene Editing Institute, Inc. ALLEY, GENEVIEVE S 1617 §102§103 Non-Final OA 69d Pending May 17, 2024
18597286 METHODS OF TREATING ATOPIC DERMATITIS Receptos LLC MERTZ, PREMA MARIA 1646 DP Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 06, 2024
18411752 Engine, System, and Method of Providing Automated Risk Mitigation Josh Kelso RIEGLER, PATRICK F 2171 §102§103 Final Rejection 49d overdue Pending Jan 12, 2024
18512349 DROPROPIZINE IN COMBINATION WITH AMBROXOL IN THE DOSAGE FORM OF SYRUP AND TABLETS Productos Farmaceuticos, S.A. De C.V. SAEED, ALI S 1616 §103 Non-Final OA 31d overdue Pending Nov 17, 2023
18368599 COMPOSITIONS COMPRISING AND METHODS OF USING 1,3-PROPANEDIOL, TO IMPROVE SWEETNESS AND/OR REDUCE BITTERNESS OF SWEETENERS Primient Covation LLC MORNHINWEG, JEFFREY P 1793 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 15, 2023
16625877 KIT FOR EVALUATING GENE MUTATION RELATED TO MYELOPROLIFERATIVE TUMOR Yamaguchi University SALMON, KATHERINE D 1682 §101§112 Non-Final OA 14d Pending Dec 23, 2019

Managing Mccarter & English, LLP Wilmington's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Mccarter & English, LLP Wilmington's patent allowance rate?

77.1% of resolved applications prosecuted by Mccarter & English, LLP Wilmington were allowed, across 576 applications in USPTO records.

How many office actions does Mccarter & English, LLP Wilmington average before allowance?

3.87 office actions per allowed application on average.

How many pending office actions does Mccarter & English, LLP Wilmington have?

11 pending office actions as of October 2026, for 11 clients, before 11 examiners in 11 art units.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month