Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 21, 2026

Mcmillan LLP

Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

6 pending office actions • 6 clients • 6 examiners • 5 art units • 0 of 6 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

MCMILLAN LLP has 458 career applications in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. The firm has a resolved allowance rate pct of 82.39. Currently, there are 6 pending office actions in the firm's queue.

The prosecution history includes an avg of 3.82 office actions per allowance. This average provides a metric for the number of interactions with the patent office required to secure an allowance. Practitioners can use the 3.82 figure to estimate the resources needed for each application. The 82.39 resolved allowance rate pct reflects the firm's success across its 458 career applications.

The 6 pending office actions show the firm's current activity in Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems. These figures describe the outcomes and workload for the firm's patent prosecution practice. This profile offers a data-driven view of the firm's performance in its technical field.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=459 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

82.4%
Allowance Rate
n=459
+0.64σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=459
3.8
OAs to Allowance
n=276
-0.01σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=276
1091 days
Time to Allowance
n=276
+7.5pp
Interview Lift
n=459
33.1%
RCE Rate
n=459
0.0%
Appeal Rate
n=459

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

75.0%
§101 Overcome
n=76
71.8%
§102 Overcome
n=124
79.8%
§103 Overcome
n=208
82.3%
§112 Overcome
n=158

Specialization & Scale

G06Q, G06F, Y02E
Top CPC Subclasses
16%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=459
4
Practitioners
n=459
114.8
Apps / Practitioner
n=459

Portfolio Summary

6
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
5
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
1
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (1)Due ≤ 7 days (1)Due ≤ 30 days (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

4
Hard (67%)
2
Medium (33%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 only1 (17%)
§101 + other1 (17%)
§103 only2 (33%)
Multi-statute (no §101)2 (33%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

1
Life Sciences
17% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
1
Semiconductors
17% of docket
4
Mechanical / Eng
67% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

60 h
Manual time on pending OAs
12 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
21 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.5 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
BARGEON, BRITTANY E 1 44.9% +33.8%
ALMATRAHI, SAHAR FARIS 1 29.7% +57.2%
AIRAPETIAN, MILA 1 72.9% +14.1%
SPAMER, DONALD R 1 59.4% +32.3%
KING, GEORGE G 1 57.9% +37.7%
HUYNH, KHOA D 1 18.1% +20.7%

Hard Cases (6)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 6 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18774761 ANONYMOUS LEGAL CASE INFORMATION EXCHANGE AND BIDDING PLATFORM AIRAPETIAN, MILA 9d overdue
17257735 Improved Camouflage KING, GEORGE G 6d
19208486 SYSTEM AND METHOD OF DYNAMICALLY CUSTOMIZABLE INTERFACE FOR PACKAGED GOODS BARGEON, BRITTANY E 14d
18875686 A SYSTEM FOR RETAINING WATER AND PROVIDING NUTRIENTS TO PLANTLETS ALMATRAHI, SAHAR FARIS —
18566511 FLUID STERILIZATION DEVICE FOR USE WITH UV LIGHT SOURCE SPAMER, DONALD R —
16971346 Zippered Garment Providing Selective Access HUYNH, KHOA D —

Interview Candidates (6)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 6 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18774761 ANONYMOUS LEGAL CASE INFORMATION EXCHANGE AND BIDDING PLATFORM AIRAPETIAN, MILA 9d overdue
17257735 Improved Camouflage KING, GEORGE G 6d
19208486 SYSTEM AND METHOD OF DYNAMICALLY CUSTOMIZABLE INTERFACE FOR PACKAGED GOODS BARGEON, BRITTANY E 14d
18875686 A SYSTEM FOR RETAINING WATER AND PROVIDING NUTRIENTS TO PLANTLETS ALMATRAHI, SAHAR FARIS —
18566511 FLUID STERILIZATION DEVICE FOR USE WITH UV LIGHT SOURCE SPAMER, DONALD R —
16971346 Zippered Garment Providing Selective Access HUYNH, KHOA D —

Client Portfolio (6 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
36882
36431
17991
28721
37321

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19208486 SYSTEM AND METHOD OF DYNAMICALLY CUSTOMIZABLE INTERFACE FOR PACKAGED GOODS 2524331 Alberta Ltd. BARGEON, BRITTANY E 3688 §101§103 Final Rejection 14d Pending May 14, 2025
18875686 A SYSTEM FOR RETAINING WATER AND PROVIDING NUTRIENTS TO PLANTLETS Global Treegro Inc. ALMATRAHI, SAHAR FARIS 3643 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Dec 16, 2024
18774761 ANONYMOUS LEGAL CASE INFORMATION EXCHANGE AND BIDDING PLATFORM Moharram Ventures, S.A. De C.V. AIRAPETIAN, MILA 3688 §101 Final Rejection 9d overdue Pending Jul 16, 2024
18566511 FLUID STERILIZATION DEVICE FOR USE WITH UV LIGHT SOURCE Origen Air Systems Ltd. SPAMER, DONALD R 1799 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 01, 2023
17257735 Improved Camouflage Hyperstealth Biotechnology Corporation KING, GEORGE G 2872 §102§103§112 Final Rejection 6d Pending Jan 04, 2021
16971346 Zippered Garment Providing Selective Access Naismith Systems Inc. HUYNH, KHOA D 3732 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Aug 20, 2020

Managing Mcmillan LLP's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Mcmillan LLP's patent allowance rate?

82.4% of resolved applications prosecuted by Mcmillan LLP were allowed, across 459 applications in USPTO records.

How many office actions does Mcmillan LLP average before allowance?

3.81 office actions per allowed application on average.

How many pending office actions does Mcmillan LLP have?

6 pending office actions as of October 2026, for 6 clients, before 6 examiners in 5 art units.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month