Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026

Merchant & Gould - Entrust

7 pending office actions • 2 clients • 7 examiners • 4 art units • 0 of 7 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 20 patents granted in the last 365 days

Quality Metrics (n=206 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

100.0%
Allowance Rate
n=206
+0.69σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=206
3.2
OAs to Allowance
n=141
-0.09σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=141
1103 days
Time to Allowance
n=141
+0.0pp
Interview Lift
n=206
27.0%
RCE Rate
n=206
13.4%
Appeal Rate
n=206

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

§101 Overcome
n=3 (min 20)
§102 Overcome
n=15 (min 20)
87.0%
§103 Overcome
n=108
§112 Overcome
n=6 (min 20)

Specialization & Scale

B41J, G06F, B41M
Top CPC Subclasses
37%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=206
0
Practitioners
n=206
Apps / Practitioner
n=206 (min 20)

Portfolio Summary

7
Total Pending OAs
6
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
2
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (1)Due ≤ 30 days (1)Due later (2)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

2
Hard (29%)
5
Medium (71%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 only2 (29%)
§103 only5 (71%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
2
Information Tech
29% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
2
Semiconductors
29% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
14% of docket
2
Business / Other
29% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

70 h
Manual time on pending OAs
14 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
24 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.6 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
LEWIS, JUSTIN V 1 55.2% +17.6%
ZIMMERMANN, JOHN P 1 83.0% +19.3%
LEGESSE, HENOK D 1 86.3% +2.2%
ELKASSABGI, ZAHRA 1 29.3% +40.5%
ALMEIDA, DEVIN E 1 71.6% +11.2%
LANIER, BENJAMIN E 1 69.2% +17.3%
ZIMMERMAN, JOSHUA D 1 40.5% +15.3%

Quick Wins (2)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19029995 CARD PRINTING MECHANISM WITH CARD RETURN PATH ZIMMERMANN, JOHN P
18740018 CARD PRINTER CONSUMABLE SUPPLIES LEGESSE, HENOK D

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18563000 A SYSTEM AND A METHOD FOR PERFORMING OPERATIONS ALMEIDA, DEVIN E 22d
18590591 SERVICE WORKFLOW INTEGRATION PLATFORM ELKASSABGI, ZAHRA 70d

Interview Candidates (6)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 6 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
16987804 RIBBON IMPRESSER/INDENTER FOR PLASTIC CARDS ZIMMERMAN, JOSHUA D 17d overdue
18563000 A SYSTEM AND A METHOD FOR PERFORMING OPERATIONS ALMEIDA, DEVIN E 22d
18261505 A DEVICE AND A COMMUNICATION METHOD LANIER, BENJAMIN E 63d
18590591 SERVICE WORKFLOW INTEGRATION PLATFORM ELKASSABGI, ZAHRA 70d
19178423 PERSONALIZED PLASTIC IDENTIFICATION DOCUMENT WITH LENS STRUCTURE LEWIS, JUSTIN V
19029995 CARD PRINTING MECHANISM WITH CARD RETURN PATH ZIMMERMANN, JOHN P

Client Portfolio (2 clients)

Client (Assignee)Pending OAs
Entrust 5
NCIPHER SECURITY LIMITED 2

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
28532
36231
24921
24371

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19178423 PERSONALIZED PLASTIC IDENTIFICATION DOCUMENT WITH LENS STRUCTURE Entrust Corporation LEWIS, JUSTIN V §103 Non-Final OA Pending Apr 14, 2025
19029995 CARD PRINTING MECHANISM WITH CARD RETURN PATH Entrust Corporation ZIMMERMANN, JOHN P §103 Non-Final OA Pending Jan 17, 2025
18740018 CARD PRINTER CONSUMABLE SUPPLIES Entrust Corporation LEGESSE, HENOK D 2853 §103 Non-Final OA Pending Jun 11, 2024
18590591 SERVICE WORKFLOW INTEGRATION PLATFORM Entrust Corporation ELKASSABGI, ZAHRA 3623 §101 Non-Final OA 70d Pending Feb 28, 2024
18563000 A SYSTEM AND A METHOD FOR PERFORMING OPERATIONS Ncipher Security Limited ALMEIDA, DEVIN E 2492 §101 Non-Final OA 22d Pending Nov 21, 2023
18261505 A DEVICE AND A COMMUNICATION METHOD Ncipher Security Limited LANIER, BENJAMIN E 2437 §103 Final Rejection 63d Pending Jul 14, 2023
16987804 RIBBON IMPRESSER/INDENTER FOR PLASTIC CARDS Entrust Corporation ZIMMERMAN, JOSHUA D 2853 §103 Non-Final OA 17d overdue Pending Aug 07, 2020

Managing Merchant & Gould - Entrust's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month