Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Merchant & Gould - Entrust

Technology areas: Networking & Security • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

9 pending office actions • 2 clients • 9 examiners • 4 art units • 0 of 9 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 21 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

MERCHANT & GOULD - Entrust has achieved a perfect resolved allowance rate of 100.0 percent across 210 career applications in Networking & Security. This flawless record indicates an extremely effective prosecution strategy for this client. The firm reaches these allowances with an average of 3.25 office actions per application, showing a standard level of interaction with the patent office to achieve these results.

There are 3 pending office actions currently being managed. The 100.0 percent allowance rate is a remarkable benchmark for the applications processed so far. Given the 3.25 average office actions, practitioners can expect a standard duration for examination while maintaining total confidence in the eventual grant of the patent in the Networking & Security space. The 3 pending actions represent the next phase of this portfolio, and the 210 career applications show that the firm has mastered the specific requirements of this technology.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=219 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

100.0%
Allowance Rate
n=219
+0.72σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=219
3.3
OAs to Allowance
n=148
-0.11σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=148
1101 days
Time to Allowance
n=148
+0.0pp
Interview Lift
n=219
25.7%
RCE Rate
n=219
13.7%
Appeal Rate
n=219

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

—
§101 Overcome
n=14 (min 20)
89.6%
§102 Overcome
n=48
89.4%
§103 Overcome
n=113
84.6%
§112 Overcome
n=39

Specialization & Scale

B41J, G06F, H04L
Top CPC Subclasses
37%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=219
0
Practitioners
n=219
—
Apps / Practitioner
n=219 (min 20)

Portfolio Summary

9
Total Pending OAs
7
Non-Final OAs
2
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
1
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (1)Due ≤ 30 days (1)Due later (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

6
Hard (67%)
3
Medium (33%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 only1 (11%)
§101 + other2 (22%)
§103 only3 (33%)
Multi-statute (no §101)3 (33%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
3
Information Tech
33% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
2
Mechanical / Eng
22% of docket
4
Business / Other
44% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

90 h
Manual time on pending OAs
18 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
31 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.8 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
LEWIS, JUSTIN V 1 55.3% +17.6%
PEARSON, DAVID J 1 78.1% +11.8%
GILLESPIE, KAMRYN JORDAN 1 75.0% +19.0%
ALI, JAHED 1 61.9% +53.8%
VO, TUYEN KIM 1 78.4% +17.7%
ZIMMERMANN, JOHN P 1 82.8% +19.5%
VU, TAYLOR P 1 69.4% +8.4%
LANIER, BENJAMIN E 1 69.4% +16.9%
RAK, TAYLOR SIMON DUANE 1 49.3% +52.9%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19029995 CARD PRINTING MECHANISM WITH CARD RETURN PATH ZIMMERMANN, JOHN P —

Hard Cases (6)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 6 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18102526 DIGITAL CARD INTEGRATION WITH CARD PROCESSING SYSTEM OF CARD ISSUER RAK, TAYLOR SIMON DUANE 72d overdue
18851657 A DEVICE AND A METHOD FOR CONTROLLING USE OF A CRYPTOGRAPHIC KEY VU, TAYLOR P 30d
19178423 PERSONALIZED PLASTIC IDENTIFICATION DOCUMENT WITH LENS STRUCTURE LEWIS, JUSTIN V —
19044258 MANAGING ACCESS TO SECURE ENTERPRISE RESOURCES USING IDENTITY VERIFICATION SERVICES AND VERIFIED AUTHENTICATORS GILLESPIE, KAMRYN JORDAN —
19042698 DISTRIBUTABLE SECURE TRANSACTION OBJECT ALI, JAHED —
19041695 ALIGNMENT SUBSTRATE FOR SMART CARD CHIP PROGRAMMER CONTACT PINS VO, TUYEN KIM —

Interview Candidates (8)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18102526 DIGITAL CARD INTEGRATION WITH CARD PROCESSING SYSTEM OF CARD ISSUER RAK, TAYLOR SIMON DUANE 72d overdue
18261505 A DEVICE AND A COMMUNICATION METHOD LANIER, BENJAMIN E 63d
19178423 PERSONALIZED PLASTIC IDENTIFICATION DOCUMENT WITH LENS STRUCTURE LEWIS, JUSTIN V —
19091491 CENTRALIZED COMPLIANCE MANAGEMENT PLATFORM FOR RISK ANALYSIS OF SECURITY OBJECTS PEARSON, DAVID J —
19044258 MANAGING ACCESS TO SECURE ENTERPRISE RESOURCES USING IDENTITY VERIFICATION SERVICES AND VERIFIED AUTHENTICATORS GILLESPIE, KAMRYN JORDAN —
19042698 DISTRIBUTABLE SECURE TRANSACTION OBJECT ALI, JAHED —
19041695 ALIGNMENT SUBSTRATE FOR SMART CARD CHIP PROGRAMMER CONTACT PINS VO, TUYEN KIM —
19029995 CARD PRINTING MECHANISM WITH CARD RETURN PATH ZIMMERMANN, JOHN P —

Client Portfolio (2 clients)

Client (Assignee)Pending OAs
Entrust 7
NCIPHER SECURITY LIMITED 2

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
24372
24081
36991
36971

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19178423 PERSONALIZED PLASTIC IDENTIFICATION DOCUMENT WITH LENS STRUCTURE Entrust Corporation LEWIS, JUSTIN V §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 14, 2025
19091491 CENTRALIZED COMPLIANCE MANAGEMENT PLATFORM FOR RISK ANALYSIS OF SECURITY OBJECTS Entrust Corporation PEARSON, DAVID J §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 26, 2025
19044258 MANAGING ACCESS TO SECURE ENTERPRISE RESOURCES USING IDENTITY VERIFICATION SERVICES AND VERIFIED AUTHENTICATORS Entrust Corporation GILLESPIE, KAMRYN JORDAN 2408 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 03, 2025
19042698 DISTRIBUTABLE SECURE TRANSACTION OBJECT Entrust Corporation ALI, JAHED 3699 §101 Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 31, 2025
19041695 ALIGNMENT SUBSTRATE FOR SMART CARD CHIP PROGRAMMER CONTACT PINS Entrust Corporation VO, TUYEN KIM §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 30, 2025
19029995 CARD PRINTING MECHANISM WITH CARD RETURN PATH Entrust Corporation ZIMMERMANN, JOHN P §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 17, 2025
18851657 A DEVICE AND A METHOD FOR CONTROLLING USE OF A CRYPTOGRAPHIC KEY Ncipher Security Limited VU, TAYLOR P 2437 §101§103 Final Rejection 30d Pending Sep 26, 2024
18261505 A DEVICE AND A COMMUNICATION METHOD Ncipher Security Limited LANIER, BENJAMIN E 2437 §103 Non-Final OA 63d Pending Jul 14, 2023
18102526 DIGITAL CARD INTEGRATION WITH CARD PROCESSING SYSTEM OF CARD ISSUER Entrust Corporation RAK, TAYLOR SIMON DUANE 3697 §101§103§112 Final Rejection 72d overdue Pending Jan 27, 2023

Managing Merchant & Gould - Entrust's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month