Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Messner Reeves LLP

Technology areas: Networking & Security • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

5 pending office actions • 5 clients • 5 examiners • 4 art units • 0 of 5 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Messner Reeves LLP prosecutes Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering applications, with 476 career applications and 5 pending office actions. Its resolved allowance rate is 74.65%, reflecting a more mixed result across resolved applications.

Applications reaching allowance averaged 2.83 office actions. The profile combines a meaningful application history with a lower resolved allowance rate, so practitioners may place particular weight on claim strategy and case-specific prosecution circumstances when evaluating this record.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=476 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

74.6%
Allowance Rate
n=476
+0.19σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=476
2.8
OAs to Allowance
n=265
-0.33σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=265
1040 days
Time to Allowance
n=265
+12.3pp
Interview Lift
n=476
22.5%
RCE Rate
n=476
1.8%
Appeal Rate
n=476

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

55.8%
§101 Overcome
n=52
66.7%
§102 Overcome
n=129
65.7%
§103 Overcome
n=198
73.1%
§112 Overcome
n=160

Specialization & Scale

H04L, G06Q, G06F
Top CPC Subclasses
40%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=476
3
Practitioners
n=476
158.7
Apps / Practitioner
n=476

Portfolio Summary

5
Total Pending OAs
4
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

3
Hard (60%)
2
Medium (40%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other1 (20%)
§103 only2 (40%)
Multi-statute (no §101)2 (40%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
1
Information Tech
20% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
4
Mechanical / Eng
80% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

50 h
Manual time on pending OAs
10 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
18 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.4 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
ARMSTRONG, JONATHAN D 1 55.3% +3.5%
LUCCHESI, NICHOLAS D 1 78.4% +9.5%
APONTE, MIRAYDA ARLENE 1 63.1% +21.1%
BHANDARI, SHREYAJ RAM 1 100.0% +0.0%
HOEY, ALISSA L 1 44.4% +32.0%

Hard Cases (3)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18410656 POCKET CUFF HOEY, ALISSA L 28d
19042950 MOTORIZED POLE MOUNT FOR SONAR TRANSDUCERS ARMSTRONG, JONATHAN D —
18718351 ZERO KNOWLEDGE PROOF BASED CHILD KEY AUTHENTICITY BHANDARI, SHREYAJ RAM —

Interview Candidates (2)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18410656 POCKET CUFF HOEY, ALISSA L 28d
18887954 JAW PROP DEVICE FOR MEDICAL IMAGING APONTE, MIRAYDA ARLENE —

Client Portfolio (5 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
37722
36451
24341
37321

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19042950 MOTORIZED POLE MOUNT FOR SONAR TRANSDUCERS Innovative Fishing Concepts, LLC ARMSTRONG, JONATHAN D 3645 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 31, 2025
18921981 DENTAL TOOL Alexander Dental Group LUCCHESI, NICHOLAS D 3772 §103 Final Rejection 36d overdue Pending Oct 21, 2024
18887954 JAW PROP DEVICE FOR MEDICAL IMAGING Cranio Mandibular Rehab, Inc. APONTE, MIRAYDA ARLENE 3772 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 17, 2024
18718351 ZERO KNOWLEDGE PROOF BASED CHILD KEY AUTHENTICITY NCHAIN LICENSING AG BHANDARI, SHREYAJ RAM 2434 §101§102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 10, 2024
18410656 POCKET CUFF Code Of Silence, LLC HOEY, ALISSA L 3732 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA 28d Pending Jan 11, 2024

Managing Messner Reeves LLP's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Messner Reeves LLP's patent allowance rate?

74.7% of resolved applications prosecuted by Messner Reeves LLP were allowed, across 476 applications in USPTO records.

How many office actions does Messner Reeves LLP average before allowance?

2.83 office actions per allowed application on average.

How many pending office actions does Messner Reeves LLP have?

5 pending office actions as of October 2026, for 5 clients, before 5 examiners in 4 art units.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month