Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Miller, Canfield, Paddock And Stone

Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

15 pending office actions • 5 clients • 14 examiners • 10 art units • 0 of 15 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 38 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

MILLER, CANFIELD, PADDOCK AND STONE has 14 pending office actions in Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems, alongside 1778 career applications. This provides a substantial record for reviewing prosecution outcomes in the firm’s stated technology area.

The resolved allowance rate is 87.7%, and the average is 2.66 office actions per allowance. These figures show a high resolved allowance rate with the same average examination activity per allowance as the available Miller & Martin PLLC profile.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=1778 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

87.7%
Allowance Rate
n=1778
+0.58σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=1778
2.7
OAs to Allowance
n=991
-0.38σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=991
1015 days
Time to Allowance
n=991
+4.0pp
Interview Lift
n=1778
15.1%
RCE Rate
n=1778
1.3%
Appeal Rate
n=1778

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

77.8%
§101 Overcome
n=36
80.2%
§102 Overcome
n=374
79.9%
§103 Overcome
n=517
82.7%
§112 Overcome
n=369

Specialization & Scale

B60N, Y10T, B60R
Top CPC Subclasses
21%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=1778
0
Practitioners
n=1778
—
Apps / Practitioner
n=1778 (min 20)

Portfolio Summary

15
Total Pending OAs
11
Non-Final OAs
4
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
2
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

9
Hard (60%)
6
Medium (40%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other2 (13%)
§103 only4 (27%)
§102 only2 (13%)
Multi-statute (no §101)7 (47%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
1
Semiconductors
7% of docket
13
Mechanical / Eng
87% of docket
1
Business / Other
7% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

150 h
Manual time on pending OAs
30 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
52 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
1.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
TRAN, JULIA C 2 62.4% +32.0%
PERVIN, FARHANA 1 81.6% +7.0%
PADUA, NICO LAUREN 1 15.4% +35.8%
DYER, ANDREW R 1 59.6% +39.3%
HARCOURT, BRAD 1 84.3% +5.6%
BROWN, CLAUDE J 1 79.8% +17.3%
HUTCHINS, CATHLEEN R 1 83.8% +8.1%
HARTMANN, ERIN MARIE 1 76.9% +34.5%
BELLINGER, JASON R 1 70.0% +18.7%
SMITH, JASON CHRISTOPHER 1 83.6% +13.0%

Quick Wins (2)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19055290 FORMING SHIELD FOR A HARVESTING IMPLEMENT HARCOURT, BRAD —
18992528 DRAPER TRACK HUTCHINS, CATHLEEN R —

Hard Cases (9)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19157599 ELECTRONIC TORQUE VECTORING SYSTEM PERVIN, FARHANA —
19223677 Video-Assisted networking Platforms and Methods of Networking Using the Same PADUA, NICO LAUREN —
19092768 PRECISION CULTIVATOR WITH VISION GUIDANCE DYER, ANDREW R —
18985430 SKID SHOE POSITION CONTROL LOGIC HARTMANN, ERIN MARIE —
18873645 CONFIGURATION OF A ROW CROP CULTIVATOR ROW UNIT TRAN, JULIA C —
18865212 ALLOY WHEEL WITH TINTED OVERCOATING BELLINGER, JASON R —
18943139 AUTONOMOUS CONTROL OF A CROP HARVESTING HEADER TRAN, JULIA C —
18839647 RAIL VEHICLE, IN PARTICULAR ROAD-RAIL VEHICLE, WHICH IS DESIGNED TO CHANGE TRACKS, AND CORRESPONDING SYSTEM AND METHOD SMITH, JASON CHRISTOPHER —

Interview Candidates (8)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19223677 Video-Assisted networking Platforms and Methods of Networking Using the Same PADUA, NICO LAUREN —
19092768 PRECISION CULTIVATOR WITH VISION GUIDANCE DYER, ANDREW R —
19021684 FLEX LIMIT CONTROL LOGIC BROWN, CLAUDE J —
18985430 SKID SHOE POSITION CONTROL LOGIC HARTMANN, ERIN MARIE —
18873645 CONFIGURATION OF A ROW CROP CULTIVATOR ROW UNIT TRAN, JULIA C —
18865212 ALLOY WHEEL WITH TINTED OVERCOATING BELLINGER, JASON R —
18943139 AUTONOMOUS CONTROL OF A CROP HARVESTING HEADER TRAN, JULIA C —
18839647 RAIL VEHICLE, IN PARTICULAR ROAD-RAIL VEHICLE, WHICH IS DESIGNED TO CHANGE TRACKS, AND CORRESPONDING SYSTEM AND METHOD SMITH, JASON CHRISTOPHER —

Client Portfolio (5 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
36715
36152
36551
41001
36621
36741
36721
36641
36661
28581

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19157599 ELECTRONIC TORQUE VECTORING SYSTEM Linamar Corporation PERVIN, FARHANA 3655 §102§103 Final Rejection — Pending Aug 18, 2025
19223677 Video-Assisted networking Platforms and Methods of Networking Using the Same Oliv Network Inc. PADUA, NICO LAUREN 4100 §101§103 Non-Final OA — Pending May 30, 2025
19092768 PRECISION CULTIVATOR WITH VISION GUIDANCE MACDON INDUSTRIES LTD. DYER, ANDREW R 3662 §102§103§112Other Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 27, 2025
19055290 FORMING SHIELD FOR A HARVESTING IMPLEMENT MACDON INDUSTRIES LTD. HARCOURT, BRAD 3674 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 17, 2025
19021684 FLEX LIMIT CONTROL LOGIC MACDON INDUSTRIES LTD. BROWN, CLAUDE J 3671 §102 Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 15, 2025
18992528 DRAPER TRACK MACDON INDUSTRIES LTD. HUTCHINS, CATHLEEN R 3672 §102 Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 08, 2025
18985430 SKID SHOE POSITION CONTROL LOGIC MACDON INDUSTRIES LTD. HARTMANN, ERIN MARIE 3664 §101§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 18, 2024
18873645 CONFIGURATION OF A ROW CROP CULTIVATOR ROW UNIT MACDON INDUSTRIES LTD. TRAN, JULIA C 3671 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 10, 2024
18865212 ALLOY WHEEL WITH TINTED OVERCOATING Superior Industries International Inc. BELLINGER, JASON R 3615 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 12, 2024
18943139 AUTONOMOUS CONTROL OF A CROP HARVESTING HEADER MACDON INDUSTRIES LTD. TRAN, JULIA C 3671 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 11, 2024
18839647 RAIL VEHICLE, IN PARTICULAR ROAD-RAIL VEHICLE, WHICH IS DESIGNED TO CHANGE TRACKS, AND CORRESPONDING SYSTEM AND METHOD Nt Innovation Ohg SMITH, JASON CHRISTOPHER 3615 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 19, 2024
18807797 ZONE GROUND FORCE SYSTEM FOR AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENT MACDON INDUSTRIES LTD. MITCHELL, JOEL F 3671 §102§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 16, 2024
18579536 PLATFORM HEADER WITH BELT FEEDER ASSEMBLY MACDON INDUSTRIES LTD. WEBB, SUNNY DANIELLE 3671 §103 Final Rejection 15d Pending Jan 16, 2024
18382109 GRAIN TRUCK DETECTION AND LOCALIZATION MACDON INDUSTRIES LTD. AFRIN, NAZIA 3666 §103 Final Rejection 27d Pending Oct 20, 2023
18272149 PLANT CULTIVATION DEVICE 4S Aachen GmbH NYAMOGO, JOSEPH A 2858 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Jul 13, 2023

Managing Miller, Canfield, Paddock And Stone's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Miller, Canfield, Paddock And Stone's patent allowance rate?

87.7% of resolved applications prosecuted by Miller, Canfield, Paddock And Stone were allowed, across 1,778 applications in USPTO records.

How many office actions does Miller, Canfield, Paddock And Stone average before allowance?

2.66 office actions per allowed application on average.

How many pending office actions does Miller, Canfield, Paddock And Stone have?

15 pending office actions as of October 2026, for 5 clients, before 14 examiners in 10 art units.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month