Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Mills Ip Law, Pllc

Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

10 pending office actions • 8 clients • 10 examiners • 8 art units • 0 of 10 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Quality Metrics (n=422 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

90.8%
Allowance Rate
n=422
+0.90σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=422
2.3
OAs to Allowance
n=258
-0.70σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=258
920 days
Time to Allowance
n=258
+12.9pp
Interview Lift
n=422
15.5%
RCE Rate
n=422
0.6%
Appeal Rate
n=422

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

—
§101 Overcome
n=6 (min 20)
84.5%
§102 Overcome
n=84
81.3%
§103 Overcome
n=166
78.1%
§112 Overcome
n=96

Specialization & Scale

A61M, G16H, A61B
Top CPC Subclasses
38%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=422
0
Practitioners
n=422
—
Apps / Practitioner
n=422 (min 20)

Portfolio Summary

10
Total Pending OAs
7
Non-Final OAs
3
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
1
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

4
Hard (40%)
5
Medium (50%)
1
Easy (10%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only2 (20%)
§102 only3 (30%)
§112 only1 (10%)
Multi-statute (no §101)4 (40%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

2
Life Sciences
20% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
7
Mechanical / Eng
70% of docket
1
Business / Other
10% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

100 h
Manual time on pending OAs
20 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
35 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.9 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
STEPHENS, JACQUELINE F 1 75.6% +14.9%
LEFF, STEVEN N 1 41.4% +8.4%
GREENE, CAROLYN LEE 1 65.7% +46.1%
SCHMIDT, EMILY LOUISE 1 58.4% +36.6%
GANAN-SINGH, CHRISTINA MERAIAH 1 50.0% +66.7%
BAHENA, CHRISTIE L. 1 68.3% +23.0%
PATEL, SHEFALI DILIP 1 58.1% +27.7%
SANTOS, ROBERT G 1 73.1% +34.9%
DIXON, ANNETTE FREDRICKA 1 74.3% +26.0%
PRICE, NATHAN R 1 53.4% +38.7%

Hard Cases (4)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18855853 CONTAINER WITH INTERNAL PORT STEPHENS, JACQUELINE F —
18815100 APPARATUS AND METHODS FOR MAKING BREAD LEFF, STEVEN N —
18733278 PORTABLE MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTIC DEVICE AND METHODS FOR THE DETECTION OF TARGET VIRUSES GREENE, CAROLYN LEE —
18652653 TEMPERATURE REGULATED FLUID THERAPY GANAN-SINGH, CHRISTINA MERAIAH —

Interview Candidates (9)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17923115 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR REMOVING BIOMATERIAL IMPLANTS PRICE, NATHAN R 6d
18334728 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR COOLING THE BRAIN OF A HUMAN SUBJECT DIXON, ANNETTE FREDRICKA 9d
18855853 CONTAINER WITH INTERNAL PORT STEPHENS, JACQUELINE F —
18733278 PORTABLE MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTIC DEVICE AND METHODS FOR THE DETECTION OF TARGET VIRUSES GREENE, CAROLYN LEE —
18668491 DEVICES AND METHODS FOR DELIVERY OF SUBSTANCES WITHIN A PREFILLED SYRINGE SCHMIDT, EMILY LOUISE —
18652653 TEMPERATURE REGULATED FLUID THERAPY GANAN-SINGH, CHRISTINA MERAIAH —
18630240 IMPLANTS AND METHODS FOR SHOULDER JOINT RECONSTRUCTION BAHENA, CHRISTIE L. —
18288965 ON-BODY MEDICAMENT DELIVERY DEVICES FOR ADMINISTRATION OF MEDICAMENT PATEL, SHEFALI DILIP —

Client Portfolio (8 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
37832
37811
17921
16811
37941
37741
36731
37851

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18855853 CONTAINER WITH INTERNAL PORT Instant Systems, Inc. STEPHENS, JACQUELINE F 3781 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 10, 2024
18815100 APPARATUS AND METHODS FOR MAKING BREAD Iyukti LLC LEFF, STEVEN N 1792 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 26, 2024
18733278 PORTABLE MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTIC DEVICE AND METHODS FOR THE DETECTION OF TARGET VIRUSES Visby Medical, Inc. GREENE, CAROLYN LEE 1681 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 04, 2024
18668491 DEVICES AND METHODS FOR DELIVERY OF SUBSTANCES WITHIN A PREFILLED SYRINGE Kaleo, Inc. SCHMIDT, EMILY LOUISE §102 Non-Final OA — Pending May 20, 2024
18652653 TEMPERATURE REGULATED FLUID THERAPY Neurointact, Inc. GANAN-SINGH, CHRISTINA MERAIAH 3794 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending May 01, 2024
18630240 IMPLANTS AND METHODS FOR SHOULDER JOINT RECONSTRUCTION B/G Ortho Innovations, LLC BAHENA, CHRISTIE L. 3774 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 09, 2024
18288965 ON-BODY MEDICAMENT DELIVERY DEVICES FOR ADMINISTRATION OF MEDICAMENT Kaleo, Inc. PATEL, SHEFALI DILIP 3783 §102 Final Rejection — Pending Oct 30, 2023
18370308 THERAPEUTIC CUSHION SYSTEMS AND METHODS Amenity Health, Inc. SANTOS, ROBERT G 3673 §103Other Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 19, 2023
18334728 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR COOLING THE BRAIN OF A HUMAN SUBJECT Neurointact, Inc. DIXON, ANNETTE FREDRICKA 3785 §102 Final Rejection 9d Pending Jun 14, 2023
17923115 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR REMOVING BIOMATERIAL IMPLANTS Contraline, Inc. PRICE, NATHAN R 3783 §112 Final Rejection 6d Pending Nov 03, 2022

Managing Mills Ip Law, Pllc's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Mills Ip Law, Pllc's patent allowance rate?

90.8% of resolved applications prosecuted by Mills Ip Law, Pllc were allowed, across 422 applications in USPTO records.

How many office actions does Mills Ip Law, Pllc average before allowance?

2.31 office actions per allowed application on average.

How many pending office actions does Mills Ip Law, Pllc have?

10 pending office actions as of October 2026, for 8 clients, before 10 examiners in 8 art units.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month