Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Murthy Patent Law Inc.

Technology area: Networking & Security

6 pending office actions • 6 clients • 6 examiners • 6 art units • 0 of 6 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Murthy Patent Law Inc. has 6 pending office actions in Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals and 101 career applications. The record shows a focused prosecution practice with current activity in a specialized life-sciences field.

The resolved allowance rate is 75.0%, and the average is 2.1 office actions per allowance. The outcome measure provides a historical resolution signal, while the action average indicates that allowance generally follows more than one examination interaction.

For practitioners, the profile supports a balanced review of allowance results and response effort. The application history is limited to the stated record, so matter-specific facts remain important when evaluating fit.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=101 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

75.0%
Allowance Rate
n=101
+0.35σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=101
2.1
OAs to Allowance
n=42
-0.96σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=42
796 days
Time to Allowance
n=42
+14.3pp
Interview Lift
n=101
16.1%
RCE Rate
n=101
0.0%
Appeal Rate
n=101

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

—
§101 Overcome
n=5 (min 20)
50.0%
§102 Overcome
n=20
52.8%
§103 Overcome
n=36
50.0%
§112 Overcome
n=32

Specialization & Scale

G06F, G06Q, G06N
Top CPC Subclasses
20%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=101
1
Practitioners
n=101
101.0
Apps / Practitioner
n=101

Portfolio Summary

6
Total Pending OAs
3
Non-Final OAs
3
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

3
Hard (50%)
2
Medium (33%)
1
Easy (17%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (17%)
§112 only1 (17%)
Double-patenting + other1 (17%)
Multi-statute (no §101)3 (50%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

1
Life Sciences
17% of docket
2
Information Tech
33% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
2
Mechanical / Eng
33% of docket
1
Business / Other
17% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

60 h
Manual time on pending OAs
12 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
21 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.5 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
MCNALLY, MICHAEL S 1 89.9% +8.6%
ROBERTS, LEZAH 1 48.6% +35.7%
EDWARDS, MARIA J 1 95.4% +5.0%
ALAM, SHAHID AL 1 87.8% +14.6%
WALRAED-SULLIVAN, KYLE 1 73.5% +30.4%
SHARPLESS, CHRISTEN ALICIA 1 50.4% +27.2%

Quick Wins (2)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
35523673 Boxing glove with grip bar EDWARDS, MARIA J 29d
18868420 A method to provide comprehensive key vocabulary for search ALAM, SHAHID AL —

Hard Cases (3)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19204489 System and method for security platform and services for protecting an artificial intelligence system and its components against threats, risks and vulnerabilities MCNALLY, MICHAEL S —
18273776 BUILDING MODULES AND TECHNIQUES TO MAKE THEM WALRAED-SULLIVAN, KYLE —
17761658 An external endoluminal fixator device SHARPLESS, CHRISTEN ALICIA —

Interview Candidates (4)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19055744 Composition for the control of oral malodor compounds ROBERTS, LEZAH 72d overdue
18868420 A method to provide comprehensive key vocabulary for search ALAM, SHAHID AL —
18273776 BUILDING MODULES AND TECHNIQUES TO MAKE THEM WALRAED-SULLIVAN, KYLE —
17761658 An external endoluminal fixator device SHARPLESS, CHRISTEN ALICIA —

Client Portfolio (6 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
24321
16121
29111
21611
36351
37951

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19204489 System and method for security platform and services for protecting an artificial intelligence system and its components against threats, risks and vulnerabilities Tag Security Networks, Inc. MCNALLY, MICHAEL S 2432 §102§112 Non-Final OA — Pending May 10, 2025
19055744 Composition for the control of oral malodor compounds Helix Science LLC ROBERTS, LEZAH 1612 §103§112DP Final Rejection 72d overdue Pending Feb 18, 2025
35523673 Boxing glove with grip bar Boxraw Limited EDWARDS, MARIA J 2911 §112 Final Rejection 29d Pending Dec 04, 2024
18868420 A method to provide comprehensive key vocabulary for search M/S. Bdsr Solutions LLP ALAM, SHAHID AL 2161 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 22, 2024
18273776 BUILDING MODULES AND TECHNIQUES TO MAKE THEM Earthbuilt Technology Pty Ltd. WALRAED-SULLIVAN, KYLE 3635 §103§112 Final Rejection — Pending Jul 24, 2023
17761658 An external endoluminal fixator device Ravita Srivastava SHARPLESS, CHRISTEN ALICIA 3795 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 18, 2022

Managing Murthy Patent Law Inc.'s Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Murthy Patent Law Inc.'s patent allowance rate?

75.0% of resolved applications prosecuted by Murthy Patent Law Inc. were allowed, across 101 applications in USPTO records.

How many office actions does Murthy Patent Law Inc. average before allowance?

2.10 office actions per allowed application on average.

How many pending office actions does Murthy Patent Law Inc. have?

6 pending office actions as of October 2026, for 6 clients, before 6 examiners in 6 art units.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month