Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

New River Valley Intellectual

Technology areas: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

11 pending office actions • 8 clients • 9 examiners • 7 art units • 0 of 11 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 7 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

NEW RIVER VALLEY INTELLECTUAL has 12 pending office actions in Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering and 406 career applications. The profile reflects a current device-focused workload with a smaller historical application base.

The resolved allowance rate is 66.29%, and the average office actions per allowance is 4.16. The allowance measure shows that resolved matters reached allowance in a more limited portion of the record, while the action average indicates substantial examination effort for matters that did allow.

For practitioners, these figures support close attention to early claim drafting, technical evidence, and response sequencing. The active matters should be reviewed for recurring rejection themes and for opportunities to clarify the structural or functional features that distinguish the claimed devices.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=406 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

66.3%
Allowance Rate
n=406
+0.38σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=406
4.2
OAs to Allowance
n=116
+0.15σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=116
1134 days
Time to Allowance
n=116
+13.7pp
Interview Lift
n=406
28.0%
RCE Rate
n=406
0.7%
Appeal Rate
n=406

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

66.7%
§101 Overcome
n=24
58.1%
§102 Overcome
n=93
63.6%
§103 Overcome
n=143
61.3%
§112 Overcome
n=111

Specialization & Scale

A61K, A61B, A61P
Top CPC Subclasses
25%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=406
0
Practitioners
n=406
—
Apps / Practitioner
n=406 (min 20)

Portfolio Summary

11
Total Pending OAs
7
Non-Final OAs
4
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

3
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
1
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (3)Due ≤ 60 days (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

5
Hard (45%)
3
Medium (27%)
3
Easy (27%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only3 (27%)
§112 only2 (18%)
Double-patenting only1 (9%)
Multi-statute (no §101)5 (45%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

4
Life Sciences
36% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
7
Mechanical / Eng
64% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

110 h
Manual time on pending OAs
22 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
38 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
1.0 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
PEFFLEY, MICHAEL F 2 77.8% +13.5%
BARSKY, JARED 2 50.3% +22.8%
CLARK, RYAN T 1 50.4% +18.2%
ZHANG, YINGCHUAN 1 68.9% +28.4%
PETTITT, JOHN F 1 25.9% +21.6%
WILSON, MICHAEL C 1 41.5% +17.8%
LANNU, JOSHUA DARYL DEANON 1 82.2% +24.1%
KING, BRIAN M 1 70.3% +23.7%
COOK, LISA V 1 67.5% +10.3%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18404473 DEVICES, SYSTEMS, AND METHODS FOR REAL-TIME MONITORING OF ELECTROPHYSICAL EFFECTS DURING TISSUE TREATMENT LANNU, JOSHUA DARYL DEANON —

Hard Cases (5)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18315233 LNG Liquefaction System and Process KING, BRIAN M 41d
18890466 MOVING TARGETS ROUTE SIMULATOR QUARTERBACK GAME ZHANG, YINGCHUAN —
18792154 LNG LIQUEFACTION SYSTEM AND PROCESS PETTITT, JOHN F —
18680548 FEL D 1 KNOCKOUTS AND ASSOCIATED COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS BASED ON CRISPR-CAS9 GENOMIC EDITING WILSON, MICHAEL C —
18348605 IMMUNOTHERAPEUTIC METHODS USING ELECTROPORATION PEFFLEY, MICHAEL F —

Interview Candidates (11)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18126561 METHODS OF ADMINISTERING SOTALOL HYDROCHLORIDE BARSKY, JARED 125d overdue
18417748 METHOD OF INITIATING AND ESCALATING SOTALOL HYDROCHLORIDE DOSING BARSKY, JARED 121d overdue
18608958 CYCLED PULSING TO MITIGATE THERMAL DAMAGE FOR MULTI-ELECTRODE IRREVERSIBLE ELECTROPORATION THERAPY PEFFLEY, MICHAEL F 43d overdue
18315233 LNG Liquefaction System and Process KING, BRIAN M 41d
18930252 METHODS OF REDUCING ADVERSE EFFECTS OF NON-THERMAL ABLATION CLARK, RYAN T —
18890466 MOVING TARGETS ROUTE SIMULATOR QUARTERBACK GAME ZHANG, YINGCHUAN —
18792154 LNG LIQUEFACTION SYSTEM AND PROCESS PETTITT, JOHN F —
18680548 FEL D 1 KNOCKOUTS AND ASSOCIATED COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS BASED ON CRISPR-CAS9 GENOMIC EDITING WILSON, MICHAEL C —

Client Portfolio (8 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
37943
37632
16282
37111
16381
37911
16421

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18930252 METHODS OF REDUCING ADVERSE EFFECTS OF NON-THERMAL ABLATION VIRGINIA TECH INTELLECTUAL PROPERTIES, INC. CLARK, RYAN T 3794 DP Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 29, 2024
18890466 MOVING TARGETS ROUTE SIMULATOR QUARTERBACK GAME Mao, Shiwei ZHANG, YINGCHUAN 3711 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 19, 2024
18792154 LNG LIQUEFACTION SYSTEM AND PROCESS NuBlu Innovations, LLC PETTITT, JOHN F 3763 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 01, 2024
18680548 FEL D 1 KNOCKOUTS AND ASSOCIATED COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS BASED ON CRISPR-CAS9 GENOMIC EDITING Indoor Biotechnologies Inc. WILSON, MICHAEL C 1638 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending May 31, 2024
18608958 CYCLED PULSING TO MITIGATE THERMAL DAMAGE FOR MULTI-ELECTRODE IRREVERSIBLE ELECTROPORATION THERAPY AngioDynamics, Inc. PEFFLEY, MICHAEL F 3794 §103 Final Rejection 43d overdue Pending Mar 19, 2024
18417748 METHOD OF INITIATING AND ESCALATING SOTALOL HYDROCHLORIDE DOSING AltaThera Pharmaceuticals LLC BARSKY, JARED 1628 §103 Final Rejection 121d overdue Pending Jan 19, 2024
18404473 DEVICES, SYSTEMS, AND METHODS FOR REAL-TIME MONITORING OF ELECTROPHYSICAL EFFECTS DURING TISSUE TREATMENT VIRGINIA TECH INTELLECTUAL PROPERTIES, INC. LANNU, JOSHUA DARYL DEANON 3791 §112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 04, 2024
18348605 IMMUNOTHERAPEUTIC METHODS USING ELECTROPORATION VIRGINIA TECH INTELLECTUAL PROPERTIES, INC. PEFFLEY, MICHAEL F 3794 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 07, 2023
18315233 LNG Liquefaction System and Process High Roller E & C, LLC KING, BRIAN M 3763 §103§112 Final Rejection 41d Pending May 10, 2023
18126561 METHODS OF ADMINISTERING SOTALOL HYDROCHLORIDE AltaThera Pharmaceuticals LLC BARSKY, JARED 1628 §103 Final Rejection 125d overdue Pending Mar 27, 2023
17787773 COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR OOCYTE-SPECIFIC CONTRACEPTION David Kroeger COOK, LISA V 1642 §112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 21, 2022

Managing New River Valley Intellectual's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

What is New River Valley Intellectual's patent allowance rate?

66.3% of resolved applications prosecuted by New River Valley Intellectual were allowed, across 406 applications in USPTO records.

How many office actions does New River Valley Intellectual average before allowance?

4.16 office actions per allowed application on average.

How many pending office actions does New River Valley Intellectual have?

11 pending office actions as of October 2026, for 8 clients, before 9 examiners in 7 art units.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month