Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Nexus Ip Law Pllc

Technology areas: Chemistry & Materials • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

7 pending office actions • 7 clients • 7 examiners • 7 art units • 0 of 7 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Nexus IP Law PLLC has 6 pending office actions in Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering and 112 career applications. The profile reflects a contained active workload and a focused historical application record.

The resolved allowance rate is 79.25%, with an average of 2.38 office actions per allowance. Resolved matters therefore show allowance in a substantial portion of the record, while allowed matters generally involved more than a single examination action.

Practitioners should review how device and mechanical claims were distinguished from the cited art and how amendments affected scope. The pending matters deserve separate file-level analysis because the historical measures do not identify the issues currently blocking progress.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=112 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

79.2%
Allowance Rate
n=112
+0.47σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=112
2.4
OAs to Allowance
n=42
-0.49σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=42
870 days
Time to Allowance
n=42
+7.1pp
Interview Lift
n=112
17.0%
RCE Rate
n=112
0.0%
Appeal Rate
n=112

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

—
§101 Overcome
n=6 (min 20)
47.6%
§102 Overcome
n=21
52.0%
§103 Overcome
n=50
56.2%
§112 Overcome
n=32

Specialization & Scale

D21H, B32B, A61B
Top CPC Subclasses
15%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=112
0
Practitioners
n=112
—
Apps / Practitioner
n=112 (min 20)

Portfolio Summary

7
Total Pending OAs
4
Non-Final OAs
3
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

3
Hard (43%)
3
Medium (43%)
1
Easy (14%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only2 (29%)
§102 only1 (14%)
§112 only1 (14%)
Multi-statute (no §101)3 (43%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

3
Life Sciences
43% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
4
Mechanical / Eng
57% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

70 h
Manual time on pending OAs
14 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
24 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.6 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
SAUNDERS, MATTHEW P 1 46.9% +38.4%
PO, MING CHEUNG 1 37.7% +13.8%
JOYNER, KEVIN 1 68.3% +23.6%
HADDAD, MAHER M 1 50.6% +53.8%
DAVIS, JASON GREGORY 1 74.2% +18.2%
TEJANI, ANKIT D 1 81.0% +16.3%
WITTLIFF, KATERINA ANNA 1 35.0% +18.8%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18022510 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR ESTIMATING SYMPATHETIC AROUSAL OF A SUBJECT TEJANI, ANKIT D —

Hard Cases (3)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17995925 DEVICES, METHODS, AND SYSTEMS FOR SUBCLAVIAN VEIN CATHETER PLACEMENT WITTLIFF, KATERINA ANNA 97d overdue
18697430 METHOD FOR HARVESTING OVERHEAD WIND ENERGY DAVIS, JASON GREGORY 23d
18854941 ORTHODONTIC DEVICE FOR A DENTAL BRACE SAUNDERS, MATTHEW P —

Interview Candidates (7)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 7 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17995925 DEVICES, METHODS, AND SYSTEMS FOR SUBCLAVIAN VEIN CATHETER PLACEMENT WITTLIFF, KATERINA ANNA 97d overdue
18697430 METHOD FOR HARVESTING OVERHEAD WIND ENERGY DAVIS, JASON GREGORY 23d
18854941 ORTHODONTIC DEVICE FOR A DENTAL BRACE SAUNDERS, MATTHEW P —
18903311 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR CONVERSION OF BIOMASS TO BIOFUEL AND EXTRACTION OF CARBON-CONTAINING PRODUCTS PO, MING CHEUNG —
18706379 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR TARGETED SANITIZATION JOYNER, KEVIN —
18701610 T CELL RECEPTOR RECOGNIZING S37F MUTATION IN CTNNB1 AND ITS APPLICATION HADDAD, MAHER M —
18022510 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR ESTIMATING SYMPATHETIC AROUSAL OF A SUBJECT TEJANI, ANKIT D —

Client Portfolio (7 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
37721
17711
17991
16411
37451
37961
37831

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18854941 ORTHODONTIC DEVICE FOR A DENTAL BRACE Esmail Medical Limited SAUNDERS, MATTHEW P 3772 §102§103 Final Rejection — Pending Oct 07, 2024
18903311 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR CONVERSION OF BIOMASS TO BIOFUEL AND EXTRACTION OF CARBON-CONTAINING PRODUCTS Greenwater Limited PO, MING CHEUNG 1771 §103Other Final Rejection — Pending Oct 01, 2024
18706379 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR TARGETED SANITIZATION Shyld Al, Inc. JOYNER, KEVIN 1799 §102 Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 30, 2024
18701610 T CELL RECEPTOR RECOGNIZING S37F MUTATION IN CTNNB1 AND ITS APPLICATION David Hou HADDAD, MAHER M 1641 §112 Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 15, 2024
18697430 METHOD FOR HARVESTING OVERHEAD WIND ENERGY Huy Toan Vu DAVIS, JASON GREGORY 3745 §103§112 Final Rejection 23d Pending Mar 29, 2024
18022510 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR ESTIMATING SYMPATHETIC AROUSAL OF A SUBJECT Philia Labs Pty Ltd. TEJANI, ANKIT D 3796 §103Other Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 04, 2023
17995925 DEVICES, METHODS, AND SYSTEMS FOR SUBCLAVIAN VEIN CATHETER PLACEMENT Scv Delivery Systems LLC WITTLIFF, KATERINA ANNA 3783 §103§112 Non-Final OA 97d overdue Pending Oct 10, 2022

Managing Nexus Ip Law Pllc's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Nexus Ip Law Pllc's patent allowance rate?

79.2% of resolved applications prosecuted by Nexus Ip Law Pllc were allowed, across 112 applications in USPTO records.

How many office actions does Nexus Ip Law Pllc average before allowance?

2.38 office actions per allowed application on average.

How many pending office actions does Nexus Ip Law Pllc have?

7 pending office actions as of October 2026, for 7 clients, before 7 examiners in 7 art units.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month