Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 21, 2026

Ohanianip

Technology areas: Networking & Security • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

5 pending office actions • 2 clients • 4 examiners • 4 art units • 0 of 5 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 12 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

OhanianIP focuses on Computing & Software with 64 career applications. The firm has achieved a resolved allowance rate pct of 76.6. This performance involves an avg office actions per allowance of 2.5. There are currently 2 pending office actions. The 76.6 resolved allowance rate pct reflects the firm's results in the Computing & Software sector.

With 64 career applications, the firm has developed experience in software-related patent matters. The 2 pending office actions show the firm's current engagement with the patent office. Clients can use the 2.5 avg office actions per allowance to set expectations for how many rounds of communication may be needed to reach an allowance. The 76.6 resolved allowance rate pct serves as a performance indicator for the firm's work in its primary technology area.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=65 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

77.1%
Allowance Rate
n=65
+0.40σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=65
2.5
OAs to Allowance
n=37
-0.55σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=37
886 days
Time to Allowance
n=37
+3.7pp
Interview Lift
n=65
29.2%
RCE Rate
n=65
1.6%
Appeal Rate
n=65

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

—
§101 Overcome
n=13 (min 20)
—
§102 Overcome
n=18 (min 20)
45.2%
§103 Overcome
n=31
56.0%
§112 Overcome
n=25

Specialization & Scale

H04L, G06F, G06Q
Top CPC Subclasses
43%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=65
0
Practitioners
n=65
—
Apps / Practitioner
n=65 (min 20)

Portfolio Summary

5
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
3
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
2
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (1)Due ≤ 30 days (2)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

2
Hard (40%)
3
Medium (60%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other1 (20%)
§103 only1 (20%)
§102 only1 (20%)
Double-patenting + other1 (20%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (20%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
4
Information Tech
80% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
20% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

50 h
Manual time on pending OAs
10 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
18 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.4 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
DABIPI, DIXON F 2 77.6% +15.2%
DENNISON, JERRY B 1 73.0% +15.9%
FURTADO, WINSTON RAHUL 1 18.9% +22.9%
REYES, CHRISTOPHER ANTHONY 1 81.5% +15.4%

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18420430 BANDWIDTH MANAGEMENT WITH CONFIGURABLE PIPELINES IN A HIGH-PERFORMANCE COMPUTING ENVIRONMENT REYES, CHRISTOPHER ANTHONY 14d
18893904 DATA-DRIVEN MENTAL HEALTH PROGRAMMING FURTADO, WINSTON RAHUL —

Interview Candidates (5)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18421080 TOPOLOGY FOR DEADLOCK PREVENTION IN A DRAGONFLY USING TWO VIRTUAL LANES DABIPI, DIXON F 8d overdue
18420430 BANDWIDTH MANAGEMENT WITH CONFIGURABLE PIPELINES IN A HIGH-PERFORMANCE COMPUTING ENVIRONMENT REYES, CHRISTOPHER ANTHONY 14d
18427540 GLOBAL FIRST NON-MINIMAL ROUTING IN DRAGONFLY TOPLOGIES DABIPI, DIXON F 19d
19435233 VIRTUAL ROUTING FIELDS DENNISON, JERRY B —
18893904 DATA-DRIVEN MENTAL HEALTH PROGRAMMING FURTADO, WINSTON RAHUL —

Client Portfolio (2 clients)

Client (Assignee)Pending OAs
CORNELIS NETWORKS, INC. 4
Charlie Health, Inc. 1

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
24512
24091
36871
24751

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19435233 VIRTUAL ROUTING FIELDS Cornelis Networks, Inc. DENNISON, JERRY B 2409 §102§103§112DP Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 29, 2025
18893904 DATA-DRIVEN MENTAL HEALTH PROGRAMMING Charlie Health, Inc. FURTADO, WINSTON RAHUL 3687 §101§103 Final Rejection — Pending Sep 23, 2024
18427540 GLOBAL FIRST NON-MINIMAL ROUTING IN DRAGONFLY TOPLOGIES Cornelis Networks Inc. DABIPI, DIXON F 2451 §102 Final Rejection 19d Pending Jan 30, 2024
18421080 TOPOLOGY FOR DEADLOCK PREVENTION IN A DRAGONFLY USING TWO VIRTUAL LANES Cornelis Networks, Inc. DABIPI, DIXON F 2451 §103 Final Rejection 8d overdue Pending Jan 24, 2024
18420430 BANDWIDTH MANAGEMENT WITH CONFIGURABLE PIPELINES IN A HIGH-PERFORMANCE COMPUTING ENVIRONMENT Cornelis Networks, Inc. REYES, CHRISTOPHER ANTHONY 2475 §103§112 Non-Final OA 14d Pending Jan 23, 2024

Managing Ohanianip's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Ohanianip's patent allowance rate?

77.1% of resolved applications prosecuted by Ohanianip were allowed, across 65 applications in USPTO records.

How many office actions does Ohanianip average before allowance?

2.49 office actions per allowed application on average.

How many pending office actions does Ohanianip have?

5 pending office actions as of October 2026, for 2 clients, before 4 examiners in 4 art units.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month