Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026

Oppedahl Patent Law Firm LLC - Cneb

6 pending office actions • 2 clients • 6 examiners • 6 art units • 0 of 6 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 12 patents granted in the last 365 days

Quality Metrics (n=151 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

95.7%
Allowance Rate
n=151
+0.67σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=151
2.5
OAs to Allowance
n=134
-0.64σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=134
1144 days
Time to Allowance
n=134
+5.1pp
Interview Lift
n=151
31.4%
RCE Rate
n=151
3.1%
Appeal Rate
n=151

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

§101 Overcome
n=13 (min 20)
§102 Overcome
n=14 (min 20)
84.2%
§103 Overcome
n=76
§112 Overcome
n=19 (min 20)

Specialization & Scale

G06N, G06F, G10L
Top CPC Subclasses
67%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=151
0
Practitioners
n=151
Apps / Practitioner
n=151 (min 20)

Portfolio Summary

6
Total Pending OAs
3
Non-Final OAs
3
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (17%)
5
Medium (83%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 only1 (17%)
§103 only5 (83%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
5
Information Tech
83% of docket
1
Communications
17% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

60 h
Manual time on pending OAs
12 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
21 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.5 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
NGUYEN, THU N 1 71.7% +26.1%
MILIA, MARK R 1 58.6% +23.0%
KASSIM, IMAD MUTEE 1 73.5% +32.3%
CHUANG, SU-TING 1 50.5% +38.9%
RAHMAN, IBRAHIM 1 6.3% -9.1%
GIROUX, GEORGE 1 65.5% +26.7%

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18009980 TRAINING OF DEPLOYED NEURAL NETWORKS RAHMAN, IBRAHIM

Interview Candidates (5)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17947963 COOPERATIVE LEARNING OF LANGEVIN FLOW AND NORMALIZING FLOW TOWARD ENERGY-BASED MODEL GIROUX, GEORGE 60d overdue
18327707 GENERALIZED EVOLUTIONARY TRAINING FRAMEWORKS FOR DEEP NEURAL NETWORKS CHUANG, SU-TING 28d
18933349 Result generation method, generation model training method, electronic device, and storage medium NGUYEN, THU N
18391354 LIGHT DETECTION AND CLASSIFICATION FOR AN AUTONOMOUS DRIVING SYSTEM MILIA, MARK R
18556619 MULTIPLE-MODEL HETEROGENEOUS COMPUTING KASSIM, IMAD MUTEE

Client Portfolio (2 clients)

Client (Assignee)Pending OAs
Baidu 4
Apollo Autonomous Driving USA 2

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
21541
26811
24861
21461
21221
21281

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18933349 Result generation method, generation model training method, electronic device, and storage medium Baidu.Com Times Technology (Beijing) Co., Ltd. NGUYEN, THU N 2154 §103 Final Rejection Pending Oct 31, 2024
18391354 LIGHT DETECTION AND CLASSIFICATION FOR AN AUTONOMOUS DRIVING SYSTEM Apollo Autonomous Driving USA LLC MILIA, MARK R 2681 §103 Final Rejection Pending Dec 20, 2023
18556619 MULTIPLE-MODEL HETEROGENEOUS COMPUTING Baidu.Com Times Technology (Beijing) Co., Ltd. KASSIM, IMAD MUTEE 2486 §103 Non-Final OA Pending Oct 20, 2023
18327707 GENERALIZED EVOLUTIONARY TRAINING FRAMEWORKS FOR DEEP NEURAL NETWORKS Apollo Autonomous Driving USA LLC CHUANG, SU-TING 2146 §103 Non-Final OA 28d Pending Jun 01, 2023
18009980 TRAINING OF DEPLOYED NEURAL NETWORKS Baidu.Com Times Technology (Beijing) Co., Ltd. RAHMAN, IBRAHIM 2122 §101 Final Rejection Pending Dec 12, 2022
17947963 COOPERATIVE LEARNING OF LANGEVIN FLOW AND NORMALIZING FLOW TOWARD ENERGY-BASED MODEL Baidu Usa, LLC GIROUX, GEORGE 2128 §103 Non-Final OA 60d overdue Pending Sep 19, 2022

Managing Oppedahl Patent Law Firm LLC - Cneb's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month