Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Pearl Cohen Zedek Latzer Baratz, LLP

Technology area: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals

13 pending office actions • 10 clients • 13 examiners • 12 art units • 0 of 13 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Pearl Cohen Zedek Latzer Baratz LLP focuses on Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals and has 14 pending office actions. Its career record includes 9943 applications, supplying a broad historical base for interpreting the active docket.

The resolved allowance rate is 79.35%, and the average office actions per allowance is 3.6. The allowance rate indicates the recorded outcome among resolved applications, while the action average reflects the examination activity associated with allowances. For practitioners, these measures provide a way to consider current response obligations alongside the firm’s historical prosecution pattern in a technically specialized area.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=9943 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

79.4%
Allowance Rate
n=9943
+0.50σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=9943
3.6
OAs to Allowance
n=5409
-0.02σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=5409
1096 days
Time to Allowance
n=5409
+12.3pp
Interview Lift
n=9943
28.8%
RCE Rate
n=9943
1.4%
Appeal Rate
n=9943

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

80.2%
§101 Overcome
n=897
78.6%
§102 Overcome
n=2452
81.2%
§103 Overcome
n=3981
83.2%
§112 Overcome
n=2902

Specialization & Scale

A61K, G06F, A61B
Top CPC Subclasses
17%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=9943
7
Practitioners
n=9943
1420.4
Apps / Practitioner
n=9943

Portfolio Summary

13
Total Pending OAs
8
Non-Final OAs
5
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 6 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
2
Due in next 60 days
2
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 6 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (1)Due ≤ 30 days (1)Due ≤ 60 days (2)Due later (2)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

9
Hard (69%)
4
Medium (31%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other2 (15%)
§103 only3 (23%)
Double-patenting + other1 (8%)
Multi-statute (no §101)7 (54%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

9
Life Sciences
69% of docket
2
Information Tech
15% of docket
2
Communications
15% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

130 h
Manual time on pending OAs
26 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
46 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
1.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
BADER, ROBERT N. 1 44.8% +25.8%
ABUZEINEH, HANAN ISAM 1 51.9% +54.2%
NGUYEN, PHU K 1 85.9% +7.9%
LEE, WILLIAM Y 1 48.0% +34.1%
TRAN, VINCENT HUY 1 86.6% +9.8%
LEY, SALLY THI 1 23.9% +15.7%
SCHULTZHAUS, JANNA NICOLE 1 35.4% +38.2%
TCHERKASSKAYA, OLGA V 1 55.5% +46.4%
KAMM, JUDITH MARIE 1 42.9% +57.1%
MIDDLETON, DANAYA L 1 49.5% +48.8%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18396854 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR TRAINING AND USING AN IMPLICIT REPRESENTATION NETWORK FOR REPRESENTING THREE DIMENSIONAL OBJECTS NGUYEN, PHU K —

Hard Cases (10)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17614563 ARTIFICIAL RECEPTORS, RECOMBINANT CELLS COMPRISING THEREOF, METHODS FOR THEIR PREPARATION, AND METHOD OF USING THEREOF IVICH, FERNANDO NMN 168d overdue
17628112 MEDICINAL AND/OR PHARMACEUTICAL COMPOSITIONS FOR INTRAVESICAL INSTILLATION, PREPARATION AND USE THEREOF SABILA, MERCY HELLEN 14d
18383256 AGENTS AND METHODS FOR PREVENTING AND TREATING SKELETAL MUSCLE DISEASES LEE, WILLIAM Y 48d
18136072 QUANTIFYING THE RESPONSE-SPECIFICITY OF MONONUCLEAR CELLS AND USES THEREOF SCHULTZHAUS, JANNA NICOLE 63d
17642515 IMMUNOACTIVE MICROPARTICLES AND USES THEREOF MIDDLETON, DANAYA L 70d
18591919 GRAPHICS TEXTURE PROCESSING BADER, ROBERT N. —
18576102 METHODS OF GENERATING MESENCHYAL STEM CELLS WHICH SECRETE NEUROTROPHIC FACTORS IN A BIOREACTOR SYSTEM ABUZEINEH, HANAN ISAM —
18450641 APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR IDENTIFYING CRITICAL FEATURES USING MACHINE LEARNING TRAN, VINCENT HUY —

Interview Candidates (8)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18013508 GSK3 INHIBITOR-LOADED NANO FORMULATIONS AS A CANCER IMMUNOTHERAPEUTIC KAMM, JUDITH MARIE 41d
18383256 AGENTS AND METHODS FOR PREVENTING AND TREATING SKELETAL MUSCLE DISEASES LEE, WILLIAM Y 48d
18136072 QUANTIFYING THE RESPONSE-SPECIFICITY OF MONONUCLEAR CELLS AND USES THEREOF SCHULTZHAUS, JANNA NICOLE 63d
17642515 IMMUNOACTIVE MICROPARTICLES AND USES THEREOF MIDDLETON, DANAYA L 70d
18591919 GRAPHICS TEXTURE PROCESSING BADER, ROBERT N. —
18576102 METHODS OF GENERATING MESENCHYAL STEM CELLS WHICH SECRETE NEUROTROPHIC FACTORS IN A BIOREACTOR SYSTEM ABUZEINEH, HANAN ISAM —
18273255 METHOD OF AND SYSTEM FOR PROVIDING AN AGGREGATED MACHINE LEARNING MODEL IN A FEDERATED LEARNING ENVIRONMENT AND DETERMINING RELATIVE CONTRIBUTION OF LOCAL DATASETS THERETO LEY, SALLY THI —
18128328 STABILIZED MICROCAPSULES, METHOD OF THEIR PREPARATION AND USES THEREOF TCHERKASSKAYA, OLGA V —

Client Portfolio (10 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
16152
26111
16331
26161
16231
21151
21471
16851
16111
16741

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18591919 GRAPHICS TEXTURE PROCESSING Arm Limited BADER, ROBERT N. 2611 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 29, 2024
18576102 METHODS OF GENERATING MESENCHYAL STEM CELLS WHICH SECRETE NEUROTROPHIC FACTORS IN A BIOREACTOR SYSTEM BRAINSTORM CELL THERAPEUTICS LTD. ABUZEINEH, HANAN ISAM 1633 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 03, 2024
18396854 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR TRAINING AND USING AN IMPLICIT REPRESENTATION NETWORK FOR REPRESENTING THREE DIMENSIONAL OBJECTS De-Identification Ltd. NGUYEN, PHU K 2616 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 27, 2023
18383256 AGENTS AND METHODS FOR PREVENTING AND TREATING SKELETAL MUSCLE DISEASES The Regents of the University of California LEE, WILLIAM Y 1623 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA 48d Pending Oct 24, 2023
18450641 APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR IDENTIFYING CRITICAL FEATURES USING MACHINE LEARNING Markforged, Inc. TRAN, VINCENT HUY 2115 §101§102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 16, 2023
18273255 METHOD OF AND SYSTEM FOR PROVIDING AN AGGREGATED MACHINE LEARNING MODEL IN A FEDERATED LEARNING ENVIRONMENT AND DETERMINING RELATIVE CONTRIBUTION OF LOCAL DATASETS THERETO Concordia University Inc. LEY, SALLY THI 2147 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 19, 2023
18136072 QUANTIFYING THE RESPONSE-SPECIFICITY OF MONONUCLEAR CELLS AND USES THEREOF The Regents of the University of California SCHULTZHAUS, JANNA NICOLE 1685 §101§103§112 Non-Final OA 63d Pending Apr 18, 2023
18128328 STABILIZED MICROCAPSULES, METHOD OF THEIR PREPARATION AND USES THEREOF Mayne Pharma LLC TCHERKASSKAYA, OLGA V 1615 §103§112DP Final Rejection — Pending Mar 30, 2023
18013508 GSK3 INHIBITOR-LOADED NANO FORMULATIONS AS A CANCER IMMUNOTHERAPEUTIC The Regents of the University of California KAMM, JUDITH MARIE 1611 §103Other Final Rejection 41d Pending Dec 28, 2022
17642515 IMMUNOACTIVE MICROPARTICLES AND USES THEREOF The Regents of the University of California MIDDLETON, DANAYA L 1674 §102§112 Final Rejection 70d Pending Mar 11, 2022
17640920 GRAFT PATCH FOR THE TREATMENT OF MYOPIA AND OPHTHALMIC CONDITIONS Corneat Vision Ltd. TRUONG, QUANGLONG N 1615 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 07, 2022
17628112 MEDICINAL AND/OR PHARMACEUTICAL COMPOSITIONS FOR INTRAVESICAL INSTILLATION, PREPARATION AND USE THEREOF Peter Birinyi SABILA, MERCY HELLEN 1654 §103§112 Final Rejection 14d Pending Jan 18, 2022
17614563 ARTIFICIAL RECEPTORS, RECOMBINANT CELLS COMPRISING THEREOF, METHODS FOR THEIR PREPARATION, AND METHOD OF USING THEREOF Yeda Research And Development Co. Ltd. IVICH, FERNANDO NMN 1678 §103§112Other Final Rejection 168d overdue Pending Nov 29, 2021

Managing Pearl Cohen Zedek Latzer Baratz, LLP's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Pearl Cohen Zedek Latzer Baratz, LLP's patent allowance rate?

79.3% of resolved applications prosecuted by Pearl Cohen Zedek Latzer Baratz, LLP were allowed, across 9,943 applications in USPTO records.

How many office actions does Pearl Cohen Zedek Latzer Baratz, LLP average before allowance?

3.60 office actions per allowed application on average.

How many pending office actions does Pearl Cohen Zedek Latzer Baratz, LLP have?

13 pending office actions as of October 2026, for 10 clients, before 13 examiners in 12 art units.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month