Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Penilla Ip, Apc - Patent Law

Technology areas: Communications • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

7 pending office actions • 5 clients • 6 examiners • 7 art units • 0 of 7 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 17 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

PENILLA IP, APC - PATENT LAW operates in Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems and has 7 pending office actions. Its career application record includes 2412 applications, providing historical context for the current docket.

The resolved allowance rate is 84.24%, and the average office actions per allowance is 3.03. The rate captures the result for resolved matters, while the action average reflects the examination steps associated with allowances. For patent practitioners, the profile supports a combined review of current response activity, historical outcomes, and the prosecution effort reflected in allowed applications.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=2412 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

84.2%
Allowance Rate
n=2412
+0.40σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=2412
3.0
OAs to Allowance
n=1710
-0.05σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=1710
1120 days
Time to Allowance
n=1710
+2.8pp
Interview Lift
n=2412
27.3%
RCE Rate
n=2412
2.0%
Appeal Rate
n=2412

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

77.8%
§101 Overcome
n=284
84.6%
§102 Overcome
n=572
80.4%
§103 Overcome
n=776
84.7%
§112 Overcome
n=380

Specialization & Scale

G06F, H01L, H04N
Top CPC Subclasses
25%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=2412
0
Practitioners
n=2412
—
Apps / Practitioner
n=2412 (min 20)

Portfolio Summary

7
Total Pending OAs
3
Non-Final OAs
3
Final Rejections
1
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

4
Hard (57%)
2
Medium (29%)
1
Easy (14%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 only3 (43%)
§101 + other1 (14%)
§103 only2 (29%)
§112 only1 (14%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
2
Information Tech
29% of docket
2
Communications
29% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
3
Mechanical / Eng
43% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

70 h
Manual time on pending OAs
14 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
24 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.6 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
BRUSHABER, FREDERICK M 2 89.7% +7.8%
WU, ZHEN Y 1 78.8% +20.8%
CHEN, JUNPENG 1 73.6% +14.3%
CAMPBELL, KEITH 1 89.7% +0.9%
LONG, FONYA M 1 3.4% +0.8%
VINCENT, DAVID ROBERT 1 80.4% +3.8%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18589409 CONVEYOR STATIONS FOR EMPTYING DEBRIS COLLECTING ROBOTS CAMPBELL, KEITH —

Hard Cases (4)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19248175 SYSTEMS FOR TRANSFERRING USER PROFILES BETWEEN VEHICLES USING CLOUD SERVICES BRUSHABER, FREDERICK M —
19026361 METHODS AND VEHICLES FOR CAPTURING EMOTION OF A HUMAN DRIVER AND CUSTOMIZING VEHICLE RESPONSE BRUSHABER, FREDERICK M —
18307757 Methods for Automatically Providing Guidance to Patient in Real-Time LONG, FONYA M —
17835820 METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR BUSINESS ASSURANCE DATA PROCESSING FOR AUTOMATED STANDARDS FRAMEWORK INTEGRATION VINCENT, DAVID ROBERT —

Interview Candidates (2)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18747233 PACKET TRACKING ENERGY HARVESTING DEVICE FOR LOCATION AND CONDITION STATE MONITORING CHEN, JUNPENG 17d overdue
19248414 Methods and Systems for Sharing e-Keys to Access Vehicles WU, ZHEN Y —

Client Portfolio (5 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
26851
24471
36651
26451
36511
36821
21231

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19248414 Methods and Systems for Sharing e-Keys to Access Vehicles Emerging Automotive, LLC WU, ZHEN Y 2685 §103Other Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 24, 2025
19248175 SYSTEMS FOR TRANSFERRING USER PROFILES BETWEEN VEHICLES USING CLOUD SERVICES Emerging Automotive, LLC BRUSHABER, FREDERICK M 2447 §101Other Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 24, 2025
19026361 METHODS AND VEHICLES FOR CAPTURING EMOTION OF A HUMAN DRIVER AND CUSTOMIZING VEHICLE RESPONSE Emerging Automotive, LLC BRUSHABER, FREDERICK M 3665 §101Other Final Rejection — Pending Jan 17, 2025
18747233 PACKET TRACKING ENERGY HARVESTING DEVICE FOR LOCATION AND CONDITION STATE MONITORING Wireless Coded Communications, LLC CHEN, JUNPENG 2645 §103 Final Rejection 17d overdue Pending Jun 18, 2024
18589409 CONVEYOR STATIONS FOR EMPTYING DEBRIS COLLECTING ROBOTS Viabot Inc. CAMPBELL, KEITH 3651 §112 Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 27, 2024
18307757 Methods for Automatically Providing Guidance to Patient in Real-Time E-Lovu Health, Inc. LONG, FONYA M 3682 §101§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 26, 2023
17835820 METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR BUSINESS ASSURANCE DATA PROCESSING FOR AUTOMATED STANDARDS FRAMEWORK INTEGRATION Yardstick (Pte. Ltd.) VINCENT, DAVID ROBERT 2123 §101 Final Rejection — Pending Jun 08, 2022

Managing Penilla Ip, Apc - Patent Law's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Penilla Ip, Apc - Patent Law's patent allowance rate?

84.2% of resolved applications prosecuted by Penilla Ip, Apc - Patent Law were allowed, across 2,412 applications in USPTO records.

How many office actions does Penilla Ip, Apc - Patent Law average before allowance?

3.03 office actions per allowed application on average.

How many pending office actions does Penilla Ip, Apc - Patent Law have?

7 pending office actions as of October 2026, for 5 clients, before 6 examiners in 7 art units.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month