Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Perkins Coie LLP - Tusimple

Technology areas: Computing & Software • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

12 pending office actions • 2 clients • 12 examiners • 9 art units • 0 of 12 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 37 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

PERKINS COIE LLP - TuSimple manages 772 career applications in Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems. The firm has a resolved allowance rate of 76.59 percent. Prosecution requires an average of 2.88 office actions per allowance. There are 8 pending office actions currently.

The 76.59 percent allowance rate is a key performance indicator for this client. The 2.88 office actions per allowance provide a measure of the effort required to obtain an allowance. With 772 career applications, the firm has a significant track record in this specific technology area. These figures allow for a data-driven assessment of the prosecution landscape.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=772 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

76.6%
Allowance Rate
n=772
+0.15σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=772
2.9
OAs to Allowance
n=494
-0.20σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=494
906 days
Time to Allowance
n=494
+20.4pp
Interview Lift
n=772
26.0%
RCE Rate
n=772
0.7%
Appeal Rate
n=772

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

63.5%
§101 Overcome
n=137
66.7%
§102 Overcome
n=255
67.8%
§103 Overcome
n=444
72.7%
§112 Overcome
n=198

Specialization & Scale

B60W, G05D, G06V
Top CPC Subclasses
34%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=772
0
Practitioners
n=772
—
Apps / Practitioner
n=772 (min 20)

Portfolio Summary

12
Total Pending OAs
10
Non-Final OAs
2
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 6 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
2
Due this month
2
Due in next 60 days
1
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 6 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (1)Due ≤ 30 days (2)Due ≤ 60 days (2)Due later (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

7
Hard (58%)
4
Medium (33%)
1
Easy (8%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 only1 (8%)
§101 + other1 (8%)
§103 only4 (33%)
§112 only1 (8%)
Multi-statute (no §101)5 (42%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
3
Information Tech
25% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
1
Semiconductors
8% of docket
5
Mechanical / Eng
42% of docket
3
Business / Other
25% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

120 h
Manual time on pending OAs
24 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
42 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
1.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
ADAMS, PHILIP CHARLES 1 75.0% +0.0%
PECHE, JORGE O 1 80.6% +16.8%
YANG, WEI WEN 1 81.9% +11.5%
ZAMAN, SADARUZ 1 45.6% +33.7%
FEES, CHRISTOPHER GEORGE 1 57.1% +22.4%
AYAD, MARIA S 1 34.9% +16.2%
BREENE, JOHN E 1 52.0% -5.2%
WALLACE, DONALD JOSEPH 1 76.9% +16.0%
JOHNSON, CEDRIC D 1 81.9% +22.8%
MILLER, PRESTON JAY 1 54.2% +24.4%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18891113 PERCEPTION SYSTEM FOR AUTONOMOUS VEHICLES YANG, WEI WEN —

Hard Cases (7)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 7 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18517517 MICROPHONE ARRAYS TO OPTIMIZE THE ACOUSTIC PERCEPTION OF AUTONOMOUS VEHICLES WALLACE, DONALD JOSEPH 112d overdue
18664712 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR AUTONOMOUS DRIVING BASED ON BOUNDED TRACKING FEES, CHRISTOPHER GEORGE 16d
18933798 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR MONITORING TIRE HEALTH PECHE, JORGE O 42d
17818338 SIMULATION METHOD FOR AUTONOMOUS VEHICLE AND METHOD FOR CONTROLLING AUTONOMOUS VEHICLE WECHSELBERGER, ALFRED H. 71d
18773299 FAULT INJECTION TOOL FOR SAFETY DRIVER TRAINING ZAMAN, SADARUZ —
18298411 METHOD, COMPUTING DEVICE AND STORAGE MEDIUM FOR SIMULATING OPERATION OF AUTONOMOUS VEHICLE JOHNSON, CEDRIC D —
18048011 CURB DETECTION BY ANALYSIS OF REFLECTION IMAGES MILLER, PRESTON JAY —

Interview Candidates (8)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18517517 MICROPHONE ARRAYS TO OPTIMIZE THE ACOUSTIC PERCEPTION OF AUTONOMOUS VEHICLES WALLACE, DONALD JOSEPH 112d overdue
18664712 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR AUTONOMOUS DRIVING BASED ON BOUNDED TRACKING FEES, CHRISTOPHER GEORGE 16d
18933798 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR MONITORING TIRE HEALTH PECHE, JORGE O 42d
18891113 PERCEPTION SYSTEM FOR AUTONOMOUS VEHICLES YANG, WEI WEN —
18773299 FAULT INJECTION TOOL FOR SAFETY DRIVER TRAINING ZAMAN, SADARUZ —
18662833 MULTI-NODE COMPUTATIONAL ARCHITECTURE FOR CONTROL OF AUTONOMOUS VEHICLES AYAD, MARIA S —
18298411 METHOD, COMPUTING DEVICE AND STORAGE MEDIUM FOR SIMULATING OPERATION OF AUTONOMOUS VEHICLE JOHNSON, CEDRIC D —
18048011 CURB DETECTION BY ANALYSIS OF REFLECTION IMAGES MILLER, PRESTON JAY —

Client Portfolio (2 clients)

Client (Assignee)Pending OAs
TUSIMPLE, INC. 10
BEIJING TUSEN ZHITU TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD. 2

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
36561
37151
36621
21721
28551
36651
36611
21871
21891

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18960915 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR A SENSOR MOUNTING SYSTEM TuSimple, Inc. ADAMS, PHILIP CHARLES §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 26, 2024
18933798 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR MONITORING TIRE HEALTH TuSimple, Inc. PECHE, JORGE O 3656 §102§103 Non-Final OA 42d Pending Oct 31, 2024
18891113 PERCEPTION SYSTEM FOR AUTONOMOUS VEHICLES TuSimple, Inc. YANG, WEI WEN §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 20, 2024
18773299 FAULT INJECTION TOOL FOR SAFETY DRIVER TRAINING TuSimple, Inc. ZAMAN, SADARUZ 3715 §101§102 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 15, 2024
18664712 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR AUTONOMOUS DRIVING BASED ON BOUNDED TRACKING TuSimple, Inc. FEES, CHRISTOPHER GEORGE 3662 §102§103 Non-Final OA 16d Pending May 15, 2024
18662833 MULTI-NODE COMPUTATIONAL ARCHITECTURE FOR CONTROL OF AUTONOMOUS VEHICLES TuSimple, Inc. AYAD, MARIA S 2172 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending May 13, 2024
18444113 SYSTEM, METHOD, AND APPARATUS FOR VIBRATION ISOLATION TuSimple, Inc. BREENE, JOHN E 2855 §112 Final Rejection 39d Pending Feb 16, 2024
18517517 MICROPHONE ARRAYS TO OPTIMIZE THE ACOUSTIC PERCEPTION OF AUTONOMOUS VEHICLES TuSimple, Inc. WALLACE, DONALD JOSEPH 3665 §103§112 Non-Final OA 112d overdue Pending Nov 22, 2023
18298411 METHOD, COMPUTING DEVICE AND STORAGE MEDIUM FOR SIMULATING OPERATION OF AUTONOMOUS VEHICLE BEIJING TUSEN ZHITU TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD. JOHNSON, CEDRIC D §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 11, 2023
18048011 CURB DETECTION BY ANALYSIS OF REFLECTION IMAGES TuSimple, Inc. MILLER, PRESTON JAY 3661 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 19, 2022
17818338 SIMULATION METHOD FOR AUTONOMOUS VEHICLE AND METHOD FOR CONTROLLING AUTONOMOUS VEHICLE BEIJING TUSEN ZHITU TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD. WECHSELBERGER, ALFRED H. 2187 §101 Non-Final OA 71d Pending Aug 08, 2022
17648291 METHOD, DEVICE, AND SYSTEM FOR SIMULATION TEST TuSimple, Inc. TSENG, KYLE HWA-KAI 2189 §103 Final Rejection 15d Pending Jan 18, 2022

Managing Perkins Coie LLP - Tusimple's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month