5 pending office actions • 3 clients • 5 examiners • 5 art units • 0 of 5 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 8 patents granted in the last 365 days
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 only | 1 (20%) |
| §103 only | 2 (40%) |
| §102 only | 1 (20%) |
| Double-patenting only | 1 (20%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| MAHARAJ, DEVIKA S | 1 | 55.4% | +11.0% |
| THOMAS, COURTNEY D | 1 | 89.1% | +9.1% |
| SCHAETZLE, KENNEDY | 1 | 84.0% | +8.8% |
| DOWNEY, JOHN R | 1 | 59.8% | +23.4% |
| CLOW, LORI A | 1 | 63.9% | +28.8% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18612346 | HEART GRAPHIC DISPLAY SYSTEM | SCHAETZLE, KENNEDY | 27d |
| 18844018 | OVERALL ABLATION WORKFLOW SYSTEM | THOMAS, COURTNEY D | — |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18878007 | AUTOMATIC REFINEMENT OF ELECTROGRAM SELECTION | MAHARAJ, DEVIKA S | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17110101 | MACHINE LEARNING USING SIMULATED CARDIOGRAMS | CLOW, LORI A | 127d overdue |
| 18878007 | AUTOMATIC REFINEMENT OF ELECTROGRAM SELECTION | MAHARAJ, DEVIKA S | — |
| 18559049 | GUIDING IMPLANTATION OF AN ENERGY DELIVERY COMPONENT IN A BODY | DOWNEY, JOHN R | — |
| Client (Assignee) | Pending OAs |
|---|---|
| Vektor Medical, Inc. | 3 |
| C/O Vektor Medical, Inc. | 1 |
| The Vektor Group Inc. | 1 |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2123 | 1 |
| 2884 | 1 |
| 3796 | 1 |
| 3792 | 1 |
| 1687 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Client | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18878007 | AUTOMATIC REFINEMENT OF ELECTROGRAM SELECTION | C/O Vektor Medical, Inc. | MAHARAJ, DEVIKA S | 2123 | §101 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Dec 21, 2024 |
| 18844018 | OVERALL ABLATION WORKFLOW SYSTEM | Vektor Medical, Inc. | THOMAS, COURTNEY D | 2884 | §103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Sep 04, 2024 |
| 18612346 | HEART GRAPHIC DISPLAY SYSTEM | The Vektor Group Inc. | SCHAETZLE, KENNEDY | 3796 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 27d | Pending | Mar 21, 2024 |
| 18559049 | GUIDING IMPLANTATION OF AN ENERGY DELIVERY COMPONENT IN A BODY | Vektor Medical, Inc. | DOWNEY, JOHN R | 3792 | DP | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Nov 04, 2023 |
| 17110101 | MACHINE LEARNING USING SIMULATED CARDIOGRAMS | Vektor Medical, Inc. | CLOW, LORI A | 1687 | §102 | Non-Final OA | 127d overdue | Pending | Dec 02, 2020 |
IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial