Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Phillips Lytle LLP

Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

6 pending office actions • 4 clients • 6 examiners • 6 art units • 0 of 6 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

PHILLIPS LYTLE LLP operates in Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems and has 6 pending office actions. Its career application record includes 630 applications, providing historical context for the current docket.

The resolved allowance rate is 81.64%, and the average office actions per allowance is 2.56. The allowance rate measures outcomes among resolved applications, while the action average reflects examination activity associated with allowed matters. Practitioners can consider current response obligations alongside these recorded prosecution indicators when reviewing the firm’s work in this technology area.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=630 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

81.6%
Allowance Rate
n=630
+0.49σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=630
2.6
OAs to Allowance
n=338
-0.49σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=338
1096 days
Time to Allowance
n=338
+5.1pp
Interview Lift
n=630
17.9%
RCE Rate
n=630
3.4%
Appeal Rate
n=630

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

62.5%
§101 Overcome
n=24
70.5%
§102 Overcome
n=112
72.2%
§103 Overcome
n=198
81.4%
§112 Overcome
n=129

Specialization & Scale

Y10T, H02K, G02B
Top CPC Subclasses
12%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=630
5
Practitioners
n=630
126.0
Apps / Practitioner
n=630

Portfolio Summary

6
Total Pending OAs
4
Non-Final OAs
2
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

3
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
1
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (3)Due later (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

3
Hard (50%)
3
Medium (50%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other1 (17%)
§103 only3 (50%)
Multi-statute (no §101)2 (33%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

1
Life Sciences
17% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
1
Semiconductors
17% of docket
4
Mechanical / Eng
67% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

60 h
Manual time on pending OAs
12 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
21 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.5 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
MCCARRY JR, ROBERT J 1 81.7% +16.9%
MORELLO, JEAN F 1 68.8% +8.7%
ADAMS, NATHANIEL L 1 72.2% +19.6%
BELAY, DILNESSA B 1 62.6% +24.9%
DENNIS, MICHAEL DAVID 1 55.2% +30.1%
WHITE, DYLAN C 1 77.1% +13.3%

Hard Cases (3)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17951384 COMPUTER-IMPLEMENTED METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR PROPOSAL AND DONATION OF AN OBJECT WHITE, DYLAN C 80d overdue
18672720 Trolley Single Point Adjustment System MCCARRY JR, ROBERT J —
18109457 VARIABLE FREQUENCY DRIVE FOR FLASH JOULE HEATING SYSTEM AND METHOD BELAY, DILNESSA B —

Interview Candidates (5)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17951384 COMPUTER-IMPLEMENTED METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR PROPOSAL AND DONATION OF AN OBJECT WHITE, DYLAN C 80d overdue
18232911 Wire Rope Hoist With Swivel Sheave ADAMS, NATHANIEL L 2d overdue
18095083 Plumber's Neck Putter with a Double Offset DENNIS, MICHAEL DAVID 79d
18672720 Trolley Single Point Adjustment System MCCARRY JR, ROBERT J —
18109457 VARIABLE FREQUENCY DRIVE FOR FLASH JOULE HEATING SYSTEM AND METHOD BELAY, DILNESSA B —

Client Portfolio (4 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
36151
28551
36541
17361
37111
36251

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18672720 Trolley Single Point Adjustment System Columbus Mckinnon Corporation MCCARRY JR, ROBERT J 3615 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending May 23, 2024
18592655 Load Sensing Device for a Hoist Columbus Mckinnon Corporation MORELLO, JEAN F 2855 §103 Final Rejection 36d overdue Pending Mar 01, 2024
18232911 Wire Rope Hoist With Swivel Sheave Columbus Mckinnon Corporation ADAMS, NATHANIEL L 3654 §103 Non-Final OA 2d overdue Pending Aug 11, 2023
18109457 VARIABLE FREQUENCY DRIVE FOR FLASH JOULE HEATING SYSTEM AND METHOD William Marsh Rice University BELAY, DILNESSA B 1736 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 14, 2023
18095083 Plumber's Neck Putter with a Double Offset M Ogden Putter Company LLC DENNIS, MICHAEL DAVID 3711 §103 Final Rejection 79d Pending Jan 10, 2023
17951384 COMPUTER-IMPLEMENTED METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR PROPOSAL AND DONATION OF AN OBJECT Exchange Technologies International, Inc. WHITE, DYLAN C 3625 §101§112 Non-Final OA 80d overdue Pending Sep 23, 2022

Managing Phillips Lytle LLP's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Phillips Lytle LLP's patent allowance rate?

81.6% of resolved applications prosecuted by Phillips Lytle LLP were allowed, across 630 applications in USPTO records.

How many office actions does Phillips Lytle LLP average before allowance?

2.56 office actions per allowed application on average.

How many pending office actions does Phillips Lytle LLP have?

6 pending office actions as of October 2026, for 4 clients, before 6 examiners in 6 art units.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month