Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 06, 2026

Platinum Intellectual Property (Fd)

7 pending office actions • 3 clients • 7 examiners • 7 art units • 0 of 7 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Quality Metrics (n=18 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

Allowance Rate
n=18 (min 20)
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=18 (min 20)
OAs to Allowance
n=3 (min 20)
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=3 (min 20)
Time to Allowance
n=3 (min 20)
Interview Lift
n=18 (min 20)
RCE Rate
n=18 (min 20)
Appeal Rate
n=18 (min 20)

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

§101 Overcome
n=0 (min 20)
§102 Overcome
n=2 (min 20)
§103 Overcome
n=5 (min 20)
§112 Overcome
n=5 (min 20)

Specialization & Scale

C12N, A61P, A61K
Top CPC Subclasses
Top-3 CPC Share
n=18 (min 20)
Practitioners
n=18 (min 20)
Apps / Practitioner
n=18 (min 20)

Portfolio Summary

7
Total Pending OAs
5
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
1
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

3
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
1
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (3)Due later (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

4
Hard (57%)
1
Medium (14%)
2
Easy (29%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other1 (14%)
§112 only2 (29%)
Double-patenting + other1 (14%)
Multi-statute (no §101)3 (43%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

5
Life Sciences
71% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
2
Mechanical / Eng
29% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

70 h
Manual time on pending OAs
14 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
24 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.6 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
CHAN, KO HUNG 1 66.4% +15.3%
POON, ROBERT 1 42.0% +26.9%
KIM, YOUNG J 1 64.8% +18.0%
YU, MISOOK 1 39.1% +17.2%
HOLTZMAN, KATHERINE ANN 1 67.6% +55.9%
DUFFY, BRADLEY 1 54.6% +45.4%
HOWARD, ZACHARY C 1 63.8% +38.0%

Hard Cases (4)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18255049 CD19-TARGETING HUMANIZED ANTIBODY AND USE THEREOF DUFFY, BRADLEY 67d overdue
19054939 Adjustable Furniture Leg Assembly CHAN, KO HUNG
18518873 STORAGE BOX AND PACKAGING STRUCTURE THEREOF POON, ROBERT
18549084 MicroRNAs AS BIOMAKERS FOR THE IN VITRO DIAGNOSIS OF GLIOMA KIM, YOUNG J

Interview Candidates (7)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 7 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18255049 CD19-TARGETING HUMANIZED ANTIBODY AND USE THEREOF DUFFY, BRADLEY 67d overdue
18034167 BCMA-TARGETING SINGLE-DOMAIN ANTIBODY AND USE THEREOF HOWARD, ZACHARY C 30d overdue
18260905 ROR1-TARGETING ANTIBODY AND USE THEREOF HOLTZMAN, KATHERINE ANN 23d overdue
18263439 NOVEL CHIMERIC ANTIGEN RECEPTOR AND USE THEREOF YU, MISOOK 85d
19054939 Adjustable Furniture Leg Assembly CHAN, KO HUNG
18518873 STORAGE BOX AND PACKAGING STRUCTURE THEREOF POON, ROBERT
18549084 MicroRNAs AS BIOMAKERS FOR THE IN VITRO DIAGNOSIS OF GLIOMA KIM, YOUNG J

Client Portfolio (3 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
36321
37351
16811
16411
16461
16431
16741

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19054939 Adjustable Furniture Leg Assembly Yixiang Blow Molding Furniture Co., Ltd. CHAN, KO HUNG 3632 §103§112 Non-Final OA Pending Feb 17, 2025
18518873 STORAGE BOX AND PACKAGING STRUCTURE THEREOF Yixiang Blow Molding Furniture Co., Ltd. POON, ROBERT 3735 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA Pending Nov 24, 2023
18549084 MicroRNAs AS BIOMAKERS FOR THE IN VITRO DIAGNOSIS OF GLIOMA Istituti Fisioterapici Ospitalieri KIM, YOUNG J 1681 §101§112 Final Rejection Pending Sep 05, 2023
18263439 NOVEL CHIMERIC ANTIGEN RECEPTOR AND USE THEREOF BIOHENG THERAPEUTICS LIMITED YU, MISOOK 1641 §102§103§112DP Non-Final OA 85d Pending Jul 28, 2023
18260905 ROR1-TARGETING ANTIBODY AND USE THEREOF BIOHENG THERAPEUTICS LIMITED HOLTZMAN, KATHERINE ANN 1646 §112 Non-Final OA 23d overdue Pending Jul 10, 2023
18255049 CD19-TARGETING HUMANIZED ANTIBODY AND USE THEREOF BIOHENG THERAPEUTICS LIMITED DUFFY, BRADLEY 1643 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA 67d overdue Pending May 30, 2023
18034167 BCMA-TARGETING SINGLE-DOMAIN ANTIBODY AND USE THEREOF BIOHENG THERAPEUTICS LIMITED HOWARD, ZACHARY C 1674 §112 Non-Final OA 30d overdue Pending Apr 27, 2023

Managing Platinum Intellectual Property (Fd)'s Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month