Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 21, 2026

Protectors Of Tech (Raise)

Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

5 pending office actions • 1 client • 5 examiners • 5 art units • 0 of 5 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Protectors of Tech (Raise) has handled 69 career applications in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. The firm has achieved a resolved allowance rate of 69.49. The prosecution process involves an average of 6.37 office actions per allowance.

Currently, the firm is managing 5 pending office actions. This active docket is part of a history involving 69 career applications. The 69.49 resolved allowance rate provides a benchmark for the firm's performance in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems sector.

The average of 6.37 office actions per allowance indicates the approach to overcoming examiner rejections. With 5 pending office actions currently in progress, the firm continues to engage in the prosecution work required for its active cases.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=69 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

69.5%
Allowance Rate
n=69
+0.52σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=69
6.4
OAs to Allowance
n=41
+0.37σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=41
1390 days
Time to Allowance
n=41
+34.2pp
Interview Lift
n=69
54.2%
RCE Rate
n=69
5.7%
Appeal Rate
n=69

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

57.1%
§101 Overcome
n=56
—
§102 Overcome
n=18 (min 20)
61.4%
§103 Overcome
n=44
63.0%
§112 Overcome
n=27

Specialization & Scale

G06Q, H04L, G06F
Top CPC Subclasses
97%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=69
0
Practitioners
n=69
—
Apps / Practitioner
n=69 (min 20)

Portfolio Summary

5
Total Pending OAs
4
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

2
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

5
Hard (100%)
0
Medium (0%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 only2 (40%)
§101 + other3 (60%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
5
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

50 h
Manual time on pending OAs
10 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
18 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.4 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
XIAO, ZESHENG 1 43.4% +32.2%
WARDEN, MICHAEL J 1 25.4% +21.5%
LEVINE, ADAM L 1 35.9% +40.0%
SEIBERT, CHRISTOPHER B 1 58.2% +41.3%
ROSEN, ELIZABETH H 1 46.0% +49.9%

Hard Cases (5)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17809874 AUTOMATICALLY DETERMINING AN ACQUISITION THRESHOLD FOR AN EXCHANGE ITEM LEVINE, ADAM L 99d overdue
18421492 GENERATING A SELECTABLE COMBINATION OF EXCHANGE ITEMS FOR QUICK REMEDY OF A DEFICIENT EXCHANGE ITEM WARDEN, MICHAEL J 4d overdue
19093509 ANONYMOUS ACQUISITION OF AN EXCHANGE ITEM XIAO, ZESHENG —
17733703 DYNAMICALLY GENERATING A SECURITY CODE FOR UTILIZING AN EXCHANGE ITEM SEIBERT, CHRISTOPHER B —
17732931 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR SECURELY GENERATING DIGITAL GIFT CARDS ROSEN, ELIZABETH H —

Interview Candidates (5)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17809874 AUTOMATICALLY DETERMINING AN ACQUISITION THRESHOLD FOR AN EXCHANGE ITEM LEVINE, ADAM L 99d overdue
18421492 GENERATING A SELECTABLE COMBINATION OF EXCHANGE ITEMS FOR QUICK REMEDY OF A DEFICIENT EXCHANGE ITEM WARDEN, MICHAEL J 4d overdue
19093509 ANONYMOUS ACQUISITION OF AN EXCHANGE ITEM XIAO, ZESHENG —
17733703 DYNAMICALLY GENERATING A SECURITY CODE FOR UTILIZING AN EXCHANGE ITEM SEIBERT, CHRISTOPHER B —
17732931 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR SECURELY GENERATING DIGITAL GIFT CARDS ROSEN, ELIZABETH H —

Client Portfolio (1 client)

Client (Assignee)Pending OAs
Raise Marketplace, LLC 5

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
36981
36941
36891
36881
36931

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19093509 ANONYMOUS ACQUISITION OF AN EXCHANGE ITEM Raise Marketplace, LLC XIAO, ZESHENG 3698 §101§102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 28, 2025
18421492 GENERATING A SELECTABLE COMBINATION OF EXCHANGE ITEMS FOR QUICK REMEDY OF A DEFICIENT EXCHANGE ITEM Raise Marketplace, LLC WARDEN, MICHAEL J 3694 §101§112 Non-Final OA 4d overdue Pending Jan 24, 2024
17809874 AUTOMATICALLY DETERMINING AN ACQUISITION THRESHOLD FOR AN EXCHANGE ITEM Raise Marketplace, LLC LEVINE, ADAM L 3689 §101§112 Non-Final OA 99d overdue Pending Jun 29, 2022
17733703 DYNAMICALLY GENERATING A SECURITY CODE FOR UTILIZING AN EXCHANGE ITEM Raise Marketplace, LLC SEIBERT, CHRISTOPHER B 3688 §101 Final Rejection — Pending Apr 29, 2022
17732931 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR SECURELY GENERATING DIGITAL GIFT CARDS Raise Marketplace, LLC ROSEN, ELIZABETH H 3693 §101 Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 29, 2022

Managing Protectors Of Tech (Raise)'s Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Protectors Of Tech (Raise)'s patent allowance rate?

69.5% of resolved applications prosecuted by Protectors Of Tech (Raise) were allowed, across 69 applications in USPTO records.

How many office actions does Protectors Of Tech (Raise) average before allowance?

6.37 office actions per allowed application on average.

How many pending office actions does Protectors Of Tech (Raise) have?

5 pending office actions as of October 2026, for 1 client, before 5 examiners in 5 art units.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month