Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Resonance Ip Law, Pc

Technology areas: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

16 pending office actions • 9 clients • 15 examiners • 11 art units • 0 of 16 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Resonance IP Law, PC has 18 pending office actions in Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering and 322 career applications. Its resolved allowance rate is 81.25%, indicating that allowance was achieved in a substantial portion of resolved matters, though the record includes other results.

The firm averages 2.9 office actions per allowance. Allowed matters therefore commonly require repeated examination responses or claim adjustments. The profile presents a focused technology practice with enough application history to show a discernible prosecution pattern, while the pending docket identifies ongoing office-action activity that may require active case management.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=322 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

81.2%
Allowance Rate
n=322
+0.43σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=322
2.9
OAs to Allowance
n=104
-0.38σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=104
816 days
Time to Allowance
n=104
+10.7pp
Interview Lift
n=322
38.3%
RCE Rate
n=322
0.0%
Appeal Rate
n=322

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

50.0%
§101 Overcome
n=34
62.0%
§102 Overcome
n=71
60.4%
§103 Overcome
n=96
56.2%
§112 Overcome
n=80

Specialization & Scale

A61B, A61M, G16H
Top CPC Subclasses
38%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=322
1
Practitioners
n=322
322.0
Apps / Practitioner
n=322

Portfolio Summary

16
Total Pending OAs
8
Non-Final OAs
8
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
3
Due this month
1
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Due ≤ 30 days (3)Due ≤ 60 days (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

12
Hard (75%)
4
Medium (25%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 only4 (25%)
§101 + other3 (19%)
§103 only2 (12%)
Double-patenting + other2 (12%)
Multi-statute (no §101)5 (31%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
1
Semiconductors
6% of docket
15
Mechanical / Eng
94% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

160 h
Manual time on pending OAs
32 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
56 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
1.4 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
RIVERS, LINDSEY RAE 2 63.5% +59.0%
STANEK, KELSEY L 1 80.7% +15.3%
CONNELL, JENNIFER PETSCHE 1 28.6% +41.5%
LEE, MICHAEL S 1 63.1% +20.9%
SHAH, JAY B 1 58.4% +6.0%
TOMBERS, JOSEPH A 1 50.5% +31.7%
STRACHAN, KATE ELIZABETH 1 49.6% +31.5%
KRETZER, KYLE W. 1 65.2% +40.3%
FERNANDES, PATRICK M 1 59.9% +31.6%
BOYLE, ABBIGALE A 1 59.8% +12.6%

Hard Cases (12)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17581581 SYSTEMS, DEVICES, AND METHODS FOR GENERATING AND DISPLAYING MEDICAL REPORT INTERFACES AND REPORTS FOR COMMUNICATION TO A THIRD PARTY VANDER WOUDE, KIMBERLY ELAINE 9d
17832620 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DETERMINING A WELLNESS SCORE, AN IMPROVEMENT SCORE, AND/OR AN EFFECTIVENESS SCORE WITH REGARD TO A MEDICAL CONDITION AND/OR MEDICAL TREATMENT HRANEK, KAREN AMANDA 27d
18576671 SYSTEMS, DEVICES, AND METHODS FOR PERFORMING TRANS-ABDOMINAL FETAL OXIMETRY AND/OR TRANS-ABDOMINAL FETAL PULSE OXIMETRY USING DC OXIMETRY MEASUREMENTS KRETZER, KYLE W. 39d
19375115 SYSTEMS AND DEVICES FOR HIGH-TEMPERATURE THERMAL ENERGY STORAGE AND METHODS FOR USE STANEK, KELSEY L —
19142952 DENTAL IMPLANTS WITH CORONAL FEATURES AND SYSTEMS, DEVICES, AND METHODS FOR DESIGNING AND MANUFACTURING SAME CONNELL, JENNIFER PETSCHE —
19026351 TURNTABLE ADJUSTMENT BUCKLE LEE, MICHAEL S —
19002127 SYSTEMS, DEVICES, AND METHODS FOR DEVELOPING A MODEL FOR USE WHEN PERFORMING OXIMETRY AND/OR PULSE OXIMETRY AND SYSTEMS, DEVICES, AND METHODS FOR USING A FETAL OXIMETRY MODEL TO DETERMINE A FETAL OXIMETRY VALUE SHAH, JAY B —
18856482 SYSTEMS, DEVICES, AND METHODS FOR MONITORING, ANALYZING, AND/OR PROVIDING FEEDBACK REGARDING USE OF A THERAPEUTIC RESPIRATORY DEVICE TOMBERS, JOSEPH A —

Interview Candidates (10)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18576671 SYSTEMS, DEVICES, AND METHODS FOR PERFORMING TRANS-ABDOMINAL FETAL OXIMETRY AND/OR TRANS-ABDOMINAL FETAL PULSE OXIMETRY USING DC OXIMETRY MEASUREMENTS KRETZER, KYLE W. 39d
19375115 SYSTEMS AND DEVICES FOR HIGH-TEMPERATURE THERMAL ENERGY STORAGE AND METHODS FOR USE STANEK, KELSEY L —
19142952 DENTAL IMPLANTS WITH CORONAL FEATURES AND SYSTEMS, DEVICES, AND METHODS FOR DESIGNING AND MANUFACTURING SAME CONNELL, JENNIFER PETSCHE —
19026351 TURNTABLE ADJUSTMENT BUCKLE LEE, MICHAEL S —
18856482 SYSTEMS, DEVICES, AND METHODS FOR MONITORING, ANALYZING, AND/OR PROVIDING FEEDBACK REGARDING USE OF A THERAPEUTIC RESPIRATORY DEVICE TOMBERS, JOSEPH A —
18756562 SURGICAL DRAINS AND SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR USING SAME STRACHAN, KATE ELIZABETH —
18643191 SUTURING BREAKAWAY ANCHOR STRIP RIVERS, LINDSEY RAE —
18139298 SYSTEMS, DEVICES, AND METHODS FOR PERFORMING ACTIVE AUSCULTATION AND DETECTING SONIC ENERGY MEASUREMENTS FERNANDES, PATRICK M —

Client Portfolio (9 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
37914
37712
36872
37411
37721
36771
37811
28991
36841
36291

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19375115 SYSTEMS AND DEVICES FOR HIGH-TEMPERATURE THERMAL ENERGY STORAGE AND METHODS FOR USE Calectra, Inc. STANEK, KELSEY L 3741 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 30, 2025
19142952 DENTAL IMPLANTS WITH CORONAL FEATURES AND SYSTEMS, DEVICES, AND METHODS FOR DESIGNING AND MANUFACTURING SAME Identical, Inc. CONNELL, JENNIFER PETSCHE 3772 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 24, 2025
19026351 TURNTABLE ADJUSTMENT BUCKLE Nifco Taiwan Corporation LEE, MICHAEL S 3677 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 16, 2025
19002127 SYSTEMS, DEVICES, AND METHODS FOR DEVELOPING A MODEL FOR USE WHEN PERFORMING OXIMETRY AND/OR PULSE OXIMETRY AND SYSTEMS, DEVICES, AND METHODS FOR USING A FETAL OXIMETRY MODEL TO DETERMINE A FETAL OXIMETRY VALUE Raydiant Oximetry, Inc. SHAH, JAY B 3791 §101DP Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 26, 2024
18856482 SYSTEMS, DEVICES, AND METHODS FOR MONITORING, ANALYZING, AND/OR PROVIDING FEEDBACK REGARDING USE OF A THERAPEUTIC RESPIRATORY DEVICE Airotone, Inc. TOMBERS, JOSEPH A 3791 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 11, 2024
18756562 SURGICAL DRAINS AND SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR USING SAME Raydiant Oximetry, Inc. STRACHAN, KATE ELIZABETH 3781 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Jun 27, 2024
18643191 SUTURING BREAKAWAY ANCHOR STRIP Aurora Medical Technologies Corp. RIVERS, LINDSEY RAE 3771 §103DP Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 23, 2024
18576671 SYSTEMS, DEVICES, AND METHODS FOR PERFORMING TRANS-ABDOMINAL FETAL OXIMETRY AND/OR TRANS-ABDOMINAL FETAL PULSE OXIMETRY USING DC OXIMETRY MEASUREMENTS Raydiant Oximetry, Inc. KRETZER, KYLE W. 3791 §101§112 Non-Final OA 39d Pending Jan 04, 2024
18139298 SYSTEMS, DEVICES, AND METHODS FOR PERFORMING ACTIVE AUSCULTATION AND DETECTING SONIC ENERGY MEASUREMENTS Samay, Inc. FERNANDES, PATRICK M 3791 §101 Final Rejection — Pending Apr 25, 2023
18121949 SUTURING BREAKAWAY ANCHOR STRIP Aurora Medical Technologies Corp. RIVERS, LINDSEY RAE 3771 §103DP Final Rejection — Pending Mar 15, 2023
18072694 ELECTRONIC PACKAGE AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF Phoenix Pioneer Technology Co., Ltd. BOYLE, ABBIGALE A 2899 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 30, 2022
17832627 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DETERMINING AND PROVIDING A DISPLAY OF A PLURALITY OF WELLNESS SCORES FOR PATIENTS WITH REGARD TO A MEDICAL CONDITION AND/OR A MEDICAL TREATMENT Outcomemd, Inc. ELSHAER, ALAAELDIN M 3687 §101 Final Rejection — Pending Jun 04, 2022
17832620 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DETERMINING A WELLNESS SCORE, AN IMPROVEMENT SCORE, AND/OR AN EFFECTIVENESS SCORE WITH REGARD TO A MEDICAL CONDITION AND/OR MEDICAL TREATMENT Outcomemd, Inc. HRANEK, KAREN AMANDA 3684 §101 Final Rejection 27d Pending Jun 04, 2022
17581312 SYSTEMS, DEVICES, AND METHODS FOR COMMUNICATING A WELLNESS SCORE AND/OR AN IMPROVEMENT SCORE TO A SOCIAL MEDIA PLATFORM AND OBJECTIFYING AN ONLINE REPUTATION Outcomemd, Inc. EL-CHANTI, KARMA AHMAD 3629 §101 Final Rejection — Pending Jan 21, 2022
17581581 SYSTEMS, DEVICES, AND METHODS FOR GENERATING AND DISPLAYING MEDICAL REPORT INTERFACES AND REPORTS FOR COMMUNICATION TO A THIRD PARTY Outcomemd, Inc. VANDER WOUDE, KIMBERLY ELAINE 3681 §101§103 Final Rejection 9d Pending Jan 21, 2022
16258363 SYSTEMS, DEVICES, AND METHODS FOR GENERATING A MEDICAL NOTE INTERFACE Outcomemd, Inc. NAJARIAN, LENA 3687 §103 Final Rejection 9d Pending Jan 25, 2019

Managing Resonance Ip Law, Pc's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Resonance Ip Law, Pc's patent allowance rate?

81.2% of resolved applications prosecuted by Resonance Ip Law, Pc were allowed, across 322 applications in USPTO records.

How many office actions does Resonance Ip Law, Pc average before allowance?

2.90 office actions per allowed application on average.

How many pending office actions does Resonance Ip Law, Pc have?

16 pending office actions as of October 2026, for 9 clients, before 15 examiners in 11 art units.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month