Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Sanders Ip Law-Alcon

Technology areas: Networking & Security • Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

9 pending office actions • 2 clients • 9 examiners • 5 art units • 0 of 9 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 6 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Sanders IP Law-ALCON focuses on Networking & Security and has 1,186 career applications. The profile records 8 pending office actions, showing current activity for this company-specific representation.

The resolved allowance rate is 92.52%, and the average is 3.48 office actions per allowance. These figures provide context on both resolved outcomes and the examination activity associated with allowances. The technology focus and pending workload help practitioners evaluate the profile for networking and security matters.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=1186 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

92.5%
Allowance Rate
n=1186
+0.58σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=1186
3.5
OAs to Allowance
n=656
+0.00σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=656
973 days
Time to Allowance
n=656
+7.7pp
Interview Lift
n=1186
42.7%
RCE Rate
n=1186
3.8%
Appeal Rate
n=1186

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

69.7%
§101 Overcome
n=218
66.9%
§102 Overcome
n=335
67.3%
§103 Overcome
n=557
73.6%
§112 Overcome
n=334

Specialization & Scale

G06F, G06Q, H04M
Top CPC Subclasses
18%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=1186
1
Practitioners
n=1186
1186.0
Apps / Practitioner
n=1186

Portfolio Summary

9
Total Pending OAs
4
Non-Final OAs
5
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

5
Hard (56%)
3
Medium (33%)
0
Easy (0%)
1
Unknown (11%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other3 (33%)
§103 only2 (22%)
§102 only1 (11%)
Multi-statute (no §101)2 (22%)
No statute on record1 (11%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
2
Information Tech
22% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
2
Semiconductors
22% of docket
4
Mechanical / Eng
44% of docket
1
Business / Other
11% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

90 h
Manual time on pending OAs
18 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
31 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.8 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
KANAAN, LIZA TONY 1 23.4% +31.5%
MARC, MCDIEUNEL 1 90.9% +7.5%
LE, PETER D 1 80.6% +15.9%
ERICKSON, BENNETT S 1 38.2% +43.6%
SAHLE, MAHIDERE S 1 79.5% +13.1%
SCHMIDT, KARI L 1 74.3% +42.1%
ROANE, AARON F 1 73.4% +9.8%
STANFORD, CHRISTOPHER J 1 55.2% +26.6%
WEBSTER, KARMEL JOHANNA 1 70.4% +27.8%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19184053 STEREOSCOPIC IMAGING PLATFORM WITH CONTINUOUS AUTOFOCUSING MODE LE, PETER D —

Hard Cases (5)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19409226 OPHTHALMIC HEALTH MANAGEMENT SYSTEM KANAAN, LIZA TONY —
19096852 SELECTION OF INTRAOCULAR LENS POWER BASED ON INTEGRATING FINITE ELEMENT MODELING WITH MACHINE LEARNING ERICKSON, BENNETT S —
19018234 IMAGING MARKERS FOR VERIFYING BIOMETRY SAHLE, MAHIDERE S —
18761775 TRANSSCLERAL ILLUMINATION FOR VITREOUS VISUALIZATION STANFORD, CHRISTOPHER J —
18175013 ROBOTIC IMAGING SYSTEM WITH ORBITAL SCANNING MODE WEBSTER, KARMEL JOHANNA —

Interview Candidates (7)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 7 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19409226 OPHTHALMIC HEALTH MANAGEMENT SYSTEM KANAAN, LIZA TONY —
19184053 STEREOSCOPIC IMAGING PLATFORM WITH CONTINUOUS AUTOFOCUSING MODE LE, PETER D —
19096852 SELECTION OF INTRAOCULAR LENS POWER BASED ON INTEGRATING FINITE ELEMENT MODELING WITH MACHINE LEARNING ERICKSON, BENNETT S —
19018234 IMAGING MARKERS FOR VERIFYING BIOMETRY SAHLE, MAHIDERE S —
18951860 EXPERT PANEL MODELS FOR NEURAL NETWORK ANOMALY DETECTION AND THWARTING ADVERSARIAL ATTACKS SCHMIDT, KARI L —
18761775 TRANSSCLERAL ILLUMINATION FOR VITREOUS VISUALIZATION STANFORD, CHRISTOPHER J —
18175013 ROBOTIC IMAGING SYSTEM WITH ORBITAL SCANNING MODE WEBSTER, KARMEL JOHANNA —

Client Portfolio (2 clients)

Client (Assignee)Pending OAs
Alcon 8
BELKIN VISION LTD. 1

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
36832
28722
37922
24881
24391

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19409226 OPHTHALMIC HEALTH MANAGEMENT SYSTEM Alcon Inc. KANAAN, LIZA TONY 3683 §101§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 04, 2025
19273372 ROBOTIC IMAGING SYSTEM WITH FORCE-BASED COLLISION AVOIDANCE MODE Alcon Inc. MARC, MCDIEUNEL Other Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 18, 2025
19184053 STEREOSCOPIC IMAGING PLATFORM WITH CONTINUOUS AUTOFOCUSING MODE Alcon Inc. LE, PETER D 2488 §103Other Final Rejection — Pending Apr 21, 2025
19096852 SELECTION OF INTRAOCULAR LENS POWER BASED ON INTEGRATING FINITE ELEMENT MODELING WITH MACHINE LEARNING Alcon Inc. ERICKSON, BENNETT S 3683 §101§103 Final Rejection — Pending Apr 01, 2025
19018234 IMAGING MARKERS FOR VERIFYING BIOMETRY Alcon Inc. SAHLE, MAHIDERE S 2872 §101§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 13, 2025
18951860 EXPERT PANEL MODELS FOR NEURAL NETWORK ANOMALY DETECTION AND THWARTING ADVERSARIAL ATTACKS Alcon Inc. SCHMIDT, KARI L 2439 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Nov 19, 2024
18780546 System for treatment of the eye BELKIN VISION LTD. ROANE, AARON F 3792 §102Other Final Rejection 26d Pending Jul 23, 2024
18761775 TRANSSCLERAL ILLUMINATION FOR VITREOUS VISUALIZATION Alcon Inc. STANFORD, CHRISTOPHER J 2872 §103§112 Final Rejection — Pending Jul 02, 2024
18175013 ROBOTIC IMAGING SYSTEM WITH ORBITAL SCANNING MODE Alcon Inc. WEBSTER, KARMEL JOHANNA 3792 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 27, 2023

Managing Sanders Ip Law-Alcon's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Sanders Ip Law-Alcon's patent allowance rate?

92.5% of resolved applications prosecuted by Sanders Ip Law-Alcon were allowed, across 1,186 applications in USPTO records.

How many office actions does Sanders Ip Law-Alcon average before allowance?

3.48 office actions per allowed application on average.

How many pending office actions does Sanders Ip Law-Alcon have?

9 pending office actions as of October 2026, for 2 clients, before 9 examiners in 5 art units.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month