Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Sanders Pianowski

Technology areas: Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

6 pending office actions • 3 clients • 6 examiners • 6 art units • 0 of 6 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 10 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Sanders Pianowski has managed 124 career applications in the Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics technology area. The firm maintains a resolved allowance rate of 92.13 percent. Currently, there are 5 pending office actions in their docket.

The average of 1.37 office actions per allowance across its 124 career applications indicates the examination path. This average of 1.37, combined with the 92.13 percent allowance rate, defines the firm's prosecution history in the Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics sector. The 5 pending office actions represent the firm's workload.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=124 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

92.1%
Allowance Rate
n=124
+0.41σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=124
1.4
OAs to Allowance
n=82
-1.45σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=82
728 days
Time to Allowance
n=82
+7.1pp
Interview Lift
n=124
3.4%
RCE Rate
n=124
12.5%
Appeal Rate
n=124

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

—
§101 Overcome
n=3 (min 20)
—
§102 Overcome
n=10 (min 20)
56.5%
§103 Overcome
n=23
80.8%
§112 Overcome
n=26

Specialization & Scale

B60D, A21D, A21B
Top CPC Subclasses
30%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=124
0
Practitioners
n=124
—
Apps / Practitioner
n=124 (min 20)

Portfolio Summary

6
Total Pending OAs
6
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

4
Hard (67%)
2
Medium (33%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 only3 (50%)
§103 only1 (17%)
§102 only1 (17%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (17%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
1
Information Tech
17% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
2
Semiconductors
33% of docket
3
Mechanical / Eng
50% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

60 h
Manual time on pending OAs
12 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
21 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.5 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
PONTIUS, JAMES M 1 79.1% +9.4%
NEAL, TIMOTHY JAY 1 78.0% +13.2%
EIDE, ERIC T 1 67.0% +21.9%
HURLEY, KEVIN 1 86.1% +11.2%
SAHLE, MAHIDERE S 1 79.5% +13.1%
SHARMA, NABIN KUMAR 1 52.6% +49.6%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19095187 Weight Distribution Hitch HURLEY, KEVIN —

Hard Cases (4)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19235419 RETINA IMAGING APPARATUS PONTIUS, JAMES M —
19173566 WIRELESS LAPAROSCOPIC DEVICE WITH GIMBALLED CAMERA NEAL, TIMOTHY JAY —
18910886 SYSTEM, METHOD, AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER-READABLE STORAGE MEDIA RELATED TO CORRECTION OF VISION DEFECTS USING A VISUAL DISPLAY SAHLE, MAHIDERE S —
18766933 QUICK CONNECT BALL COUPLER SHARMA, NABIN KUMAR —

Interview Candidates (5)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19097392 Linear Lighting and Retaining System EIDE, ERIC T 119d overdue
19173566 WIRELESS LAPAROSCOPIC DEVICE WITH GIMBALLED CAMERA NEAL, TIMOTHY JAY —
19095187 Weight Distribution Hitch HURLEY, KEVIN —
18910886 SYSTEM, METHOD, AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER-READABLE STORAGE MEDIA RELATED TO CORRECTION OF VISION DEFECTS USING A VISUAL DISPLAY SAHLE, MAHIDERE S —
18766933 QUICK CONNECT BALL COUPLER SHARMA, NABIN KUMAR —

Client Portfolio (3 clients)

Client (Assignee)Pending OAs
Raytrx, LLC 3
Gen-Y Creations 2
ABC Marketing, Inc. 1

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
24881
37951
28751
36111
28721
36121

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19235419 RETINA IMAGING APPARATUS Raytrx, LLC PONTIUS, JAMES M 2488 §101 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 11, 2025
19173566 WIRELESS LAPAROSCOPIC DEVICE WITH GIMBALLED CAMERA Raytrx, LLC NEAL, TIMOTHY JAY 3795 §101 Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 08, 2025
19097392 Linear Lighting and Retaining System Abc Marketing, Inc. EIDE, ERIC T 2875 §103 Non-Final OA 119d overdue Pending Apr 01, 2025
19095187 Weight Distribution Hitch Gen-Y Creations, LLC HURLEY, KEVIN 3611 §102 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 31, 2025
18910886 SYSTEM, METHOD, AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER-READABLE STORAGE MEDIA RELATED TO CORRECTION OF VISION DEFECTS USING A VISUAL DISPLAY Raytrx, LLC SAHLE, MAHIDERE S 2872 §101 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 09, 2024
18766933 QUICK CONNECT BALL COUPLER Gen-Y Creations, LLC SHARMA, NABIN KUMAR 3612 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 09, 2024

Managing Sanders Pianowski's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Sanders Pianowski's patent allowance rate?

92.1% of resolved applications prosecuted by Sanders Pianowski were allowed, across 124 applications in USPTO records.

How many office actions does Sanders Pianowski average before allowance?

1.37 office actions per allowed application on average.

How many pending office actions does Sanders Pianowski have?

6 pending office actions as of October 2026, for 3 clients, before 6 examiners in 6 art units.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month