Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Saxton & Stump, LLC

Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

17 pending office actions • 14 clients • 17 examiners • 15 art units • 0 of 17 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Saxton & Stump, LLC reports 1247 career applications, 17 pending office actions, and a Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems focus. The application history indicates a substantial practice record, while the pending docket identifies ongoing prosecution activity in a field spanning physical systems and digitally enabled functions.

The resolved allowance rate is 92.57%, and the average is 1.99 office actions per allowance. These figures provide complementary context: one addresses the share of resolved matters reaching allowance, and the other indicates the examination activity associated with an allowance. Practitioners can use them when setting expectations for portfolio management and response planning.

The metrics do not explain why particular applications succeeded or required action. Reviewers should still examine claim construction, prior-art distinctions, eligibility issues where relevant, and support for system interactions. The technology classification makes that technical review central to interpreting the historical indicators.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=1247 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

92.6%
Allowance Rate
n=1247
+0.53σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=1247
2.0
OAs to Allowance
n=922
-1.00σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=922
934 days
Time to Allowance
n=922
+2.1pp
Interview Lift
n=1247
11.4%
RCE Rate
n=1247
3.5%
Appeal Rate
n=1247

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

67.6%
§101 Overcome
n=37
81.4%
§102 Overcome
n=247
79.7%
§103 Overcome
n=390
83.1%
§112 Overcome
n=326

Specialization & Scale

Y10T, F16M, E04H
Top CPC Subclasses
13%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=1247
1
Practitioners
n=1247
1247.0
Apps / Practitioner
n=1247

Portfolio Summary

17
Total Pending OAs
12
Non-Final OAs
4
Final Rejections
1
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

3
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (3)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

8
Hard (47%)
8
Medium (47%)
1
Easy (6%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other1 (6%)
§103 only8 (47%)
§112 only1 (6%)
Multi-statute (no §101)7 (41%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

4
Life Sciences
24% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
2
Communications
12% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
10
Mechanical / Eng
59% of docket
1
Business / Other
6% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

170 h
Manual time on pending OAs
34 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
59 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
1.5 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
VAN BRAMER, JOHN W 1 33.1% +33.1%
GOKHALE, PRASAD V 1 85.9% +8.4%
NIESZ, JASON KAROL 1 77.6% +24.9%
BARFIELD, ANTHONY DERRELL 1 80.2% +13.9%
PUNTIER, CHRIS ALEJANDRO 1 93.3% +9.7%
PENCE, JETHRO M 1 79.1% +25.2%
TRAC, JONATHAN KHANH 1 — —
GE, JIN 1 79.6% +19.0%
THOMPSON, KENNETH L 1 87.4% +6.8%
ORTIZ, ADAM C 1 65.8% +34.7%

Quick Wins (2)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19092275 EXPERIENCE PLATFORM PUNTIER, CHRIS ALEJANDRO —
18955525 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR CONNECTING WORKPIECES THOMPSON, KENNETH L —

Hard Cases (8)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18647196 DRIFT ELIMINATOR AND METHOD OF MAKING HOBSON, STEPHEN 161d overdue
17955196 Preserving Buildings and Other Assets from Bushfires BARRERA, JUAN C 46d overdue
19338774 LOYALTY PROGRAM VAN BRAMER, JOHN W —
19335457 MULTI-AXIS MODULAR COUPLING SYSTEM FOR MOBILE ROBOT GOKHALE, PRASAD V —
19151790 BEVERAGE PACKAGING EQUIPMENT, DOSING SYSTEM, AND METHODS FOR INFUSING BEVERAGES NIESZ, JASON KAROL —
19203978 QUICK-ACTING BELT TENSIONER FOR A CHILD SAFETY SEAT BARFIELD, ANTHONY DERRELL —
18877512 VIRTUAL GALLERY SPACE SYSTEM GE, JIN —
18928732 PICKLEBALL PADDLE HAVING HEAD GEOMETRY TO ENLARGE SWEET SPOT AREA PASSANITI, SEBASTIANO —

Interview Candidates (6)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 6 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19338774 LOYALTY PROGRAM VAN BRAMER, JOHN W —
19151790 BEVERAGE PACKAGING EQUIPMENT, DOSING SYSTEM, AND METHODS FOR INFUSING BEVERAGES NIESZ, JASON KAROL —
19203978 QUICK-ACTING BELT TENSIONER FOR A CHILD SAFETY SEAT BARFIELD, ANTHONY DERRELL —
19087007 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR APPLYING AN ADHESIVE POWDER TO A PRINTED TRANSFER FILM PENCE, JETHRO M —
18877512 VIRTUAL GALLERY SPACE SYSTEM GE, JIN —
18943402 VERTICAL CABLE RAILING AND METHOD OF INSTALLATION ORTIZ, ADAM C —

Client Portfolio (14 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
36532
36221
37531
26161
17121
26191
36761
36731
37111
17431

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19338774 LOYALTY PROGRAM Mkn International LLC VAN BRAMER, JOHN W 3622 §101§102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 24, 2025
19335457 MULTI-AXIS MODULAR COUPLING SYSTEM FOR MOBILE ROBOT Avridh Technologies, Inc. GOKHALE, PRASAD V 3653 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 22, 2025
19151790 BEVERAGE PACKAGING EQUIPMENT, DOSING SYSTEM, AND METHODS FOR INFUSING BEVERAGES Agtech Vi, LLC NIESZ, JASON KAROL 3753 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 29, 2025
19203978 QUICK-ACTING BELT TENSIONER FOR A CHILD SAFETY SEAT Artsana Usa, Inc. BARFIELD, ANTHONY DERRELL §102§112Other Non-Final OA — Pending May 09, 2025
19092275 EXPERIENCE PLATFORM Tait Towers Manufacturing, LLC PUNTIER, CHRIS ALEJANDRO 2616 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 27, 2025
19087007 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR APPLYING AN ADHESIVE POWDER TO A PRINTED TRANSFER FILM Vastex International Inc. PENCE, JETHRO M 1712 §112 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 21, 2025
19007748 BATTERY PLATE HANDLING APPARATUS AND METHOD Tbs Engineering Limited TRAC, JONATHAN KHANH 3653 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 02, 2025
18877512 VIRTUAL GALLERY SPACE SYSTEM Polycarbon Blockchain, Inc. GE, JIN 2619 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 20, 2024
18955525 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR CONNECTING WORKPIECES Tait Towers Manufacturing, LLC THOMPSON, KENNETH L 3676 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Nov 21, 2024
18943402 VERTICAL CABLE RAILING AND METHOD OF INSTALLATION Key-Link Fencing & Railing, Inc. ORTIZ, ADAM C 3673 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Nov 11, 2024
18928732 PICKLEBALL PADDLE HAVING HEAD GEOMETRY TO ENLARGE SWEET SPOT AREA Avoura LLC PASSANITI, SEBASTIANO 3711 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 28, 2024
18799139 LASER SCORING OF POLYMERIC SUBSTRATES FOR USE IN PACKAGING C.P. Converters, Inc. SANDERS, JAMES M 1743 §103 Non-Final OA 53d overdue Pending Aug 09, 2024
18647196 DRIFT ELIMINATOR AND METHOD OF MAKING Brentwood Industries, Inc. HOBSON, STEPHEN 1776 §103§112 Final Rejection 161d overdue Pending Apr 26, 2024
18605052 EXPANDABLE BRIDGE DECK PANEL FOR A MODULAR DECK SYSTEM Tait Towers Manufacturing, LLC LAUX, JESSICA L 3635 §103Other Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 14, 2024
18590239 MAGNETIC CONNECTOR Artsana Usa, Inc. DO, ROWLAND 3677 §103Other Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 28, 2024
18521155 CONTROLLED-RELEASE DISPENSER ARTICLE FOR CONTROLLING INSECTS Aberdeen Road Company ALAWADI, SARAH 1619 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 28, 2023
17955196 Preserving Buildings and Other Assets from Bushfires Eps Investments Australia Pty Ltd. BARRERA, JUAN C 3752 §103§112 Final Rejection 46d overdue Pending Sep 28, 2022

Managing Saxton & Stump, LLC's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Saxton & Stump, LLC's patent allowance rate?

92.6% of resolved applications prosecuted by Saxton & Stump, LLC were allowed, across 1,247 applications in USPTO records.

How many office actions does Saxton & Stump, LLC average before allowance?

1.99 office actions per allowed application on average.

How many pending office actions does Saxton & Stump, LLC have?

17 pending office actions as of October 2026, for 14 clients, before 17 examiners in 15 art units.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month