Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Scherrer Patent & Trademark Law P.C.

Technology areas: Chemistry & Materials • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

12 pending office actions • 10 clients • 12 examiners • 10 art units • 0 of 12 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

SCHERRER PATENT & TRADEMARK LAW P.C. reports 820 career applications, 11 pending office actions, and a Chemistry & Materials focus. The application record is accompanied by an active workload involving subject matter where composition, process, and material-property limitations may be important.

The resolved allowance rate is 83.39%, and the average is 2.94 office actions per allowance. These figures separately inform historical resolution and examination effort. Practitioners can use them to frame resource expectations, but they do not reveal whether outcomes were driven by prior art, claim construction, written description, or process limitations.

Individual prosecution histories should therefore remain the basis for response decisions. Reviewers should test the connection between claim language and the disclosed chemistry, assess the cited references, and consider whether amendments preserve commercially relevant material or process scope.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=820 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

83.4%
Allowance Rate
n=820
+0.52σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=820
2.9
OAs to Allowance
n=457
-0.46σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=457
912 days
Time to Allowance
n=457
+14.5pp
Interview Lift
n=820
21.0%
RCE Rate
n=820
1.7%
Appeal Rate
n=820

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

81.8%
§101 Overcome
n=44
77.9%
§102 Overcome
n=231
76.0%
§103 Overcome
n=334
83.6%
§112 Overcome
n=262

Specialization & Scale

B65D, G06Q, G06F
Top CPC Subclasses
9%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=820
1
Practitioners
n=820
820.0
Apps / Practitioner
n=820

Portfolio Summary

12
Total Pending OAs
8
Non-Final OAs
3
Final Rejections
1
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

2
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
1
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (2)Due ≤ 30 days (1)Due later (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

3
Hard (25%)
9
Medium (75%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only9 (75%)
Multi-statute (no §101)3 (25%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

6
Life Sciences
50% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
1
Semiconductors
8% of docket
4
Mechanical / Eng
33% of docket
1
Business / Other
8% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

120 h
Manual time on pending OAs
24 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
42 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
1.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
DHANANI, SHAMS 1 92.5% +9.3%
GULLEDGE, BRIAN M 1 55.9% +26.2%
GEMBEH, SHIRLEY V 1 63.1% +33.8%
SWANSON, ANDREW L 1 66.5% +11.9%
KUAN, JOHN CHUNYANG 1 72.5% +47.4%
TAYLOR, JORDAN W 1 63.2% +36.9%
KERSHAW, KELLY P 1 17.7% +16.0%
CAIN, JENNIFER LYNN 1 43.5% +67.7%
COLLINS, RAVEN 1 62.6% +10.2%
NEWAY, BLAINE GIRMA 1 30.1% +39.8%

Hard Cases (3)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18515601 RHODIOLA CRENULATA COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS OF MAKING THE SAME CAIN, JENNIFER LYNN 22d overdue
19118573 MOBILE ROBOT SUSPENSION SYSTEM DHANANI, SHAMS —
18409973 GLYCEROPHOSPHATE COMPOSITIONS FOR IMPROVING FLAVOR IN CONSUMABLE PRODUCTS KERSHAW, KELLY P —

Interview Candidates (9)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18515601 RHODIOLA CRENULATA COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS OF MAKING THE SAME CAIN, JENNIFER LYNN 22d overdue
18673726 GLASS EDGE FOILER APPARATUS AND METHODS OF USING THE SAME SWANSON, ANDREW L 71d
18946181 COMPOSITIONS COMPRISING ULTRAFINE BUBBLES AND METHODS OF USING THEREOF IN A METHOD OF PRODUCING AND DELIVERING ACTIVE PHARMACEUTICAL INGREDIENTS AND OTHER DISSOLVED SOLUTES GULLEDGE, BRIAN M —
18945984 COMPOSITIONS COMPRISING ULTRAFINE BUBBLES AND METHODS OF USING THEREOF IN AGRICULTURE GEMBEH, SHIRLEY V —
18441096 Systems and Methods for Monitoring Paint Spray Booths KUAN, JOHN CHUNYANG —
18413335 RADIUM ADSORBENT COMPOSITIONS, SYSTEMS, AND METHODS OF USING THE SAME TAYLOR, JORDAN W —
18409973 GLYCEROPHOSPHATE COMPOSITIONS FOR IMPROVING FLAVOR IN CONSUMABLE PRODUCTS KERSHAW, KELLY P —
18385491 BOTTLE COLLINS, RAVEN —

Client Portfolio (10 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
37352
36141
16991
17451
28571
17381
17911
16551
17361
37611

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19118573 MOBILE ROBOT SUSPENSION SYSTEM Difacto Robotics & Automation Private Ltd. DHANANI, SHAMS 3614 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 04, 2025
18946181 COMPOSITIONS COMPRISING ULTRAFINE BUBBLES AND METHODS OF USING THEREOF IN A METHOD OF PRODUCING AND DELIVERING ACTIVE PHARMACEUTICAL INGREDIENTS AND OTHER DISSOLVED SOLUTES Hydrosome Ip, LLC GULLEDGE, BRIAN M 1699 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 13, 2024
18945984 COMPOSITIONS COMPRISING ULTRAFINE BUBBLES AND METHODS OF USING THEREOF IN AGRICULTURE Hydrosome Ip, LLC GEMBEH, SHIRLEY V §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 13, 2024
18673726 GLASS EDGE FOILER APPARATUS AND METHODS OF USING THE SAME Creator'S Stained Glass, Inc. SWANSON, ANDREW L 1745 §103 Non-Final OA 71d Pending May 24, 2024
18441096 Systems and Methods for Monitoring Paint Spray Booths Global Finishing Solutions LLC KUAN, JOHN CHUNYANG 2857 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 14, 2024
18413335 RADIUM ADSORBENT COMPOSITIONS, SYSTEMS, AND METHODS OF USING THE SAME Stochastic Research Technologies LLC TAYLOR, JORDAN W 1738 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 16, 2024
18409973 GLYCEROPHOSPHATE COMPOSITIONS FOR IMPROVING FLAVOR IN CONSUMABLE PRODUCTS NutriScience Innovations LLC KERSHAW, KELLY P 1791 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 11, 2024
18515601 RHODIOLA CRENULATA COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS OF MAKING THE SAME NutriScience Innovations LLC CAIN, JENNIFER LYNN 1655 §102§103§112 Final Rejection 22d overdue Pending Nov 21, 2023
18385491 BOTTLE Diageo Great Britain Limited COLLINS, RAVEN 3735 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Oct 31, 2023
18373556 SELF-STANDING FOLDABLE CONTAINER APPARATUSES AND METHODS OF USING THE SAME Gorilla Drum Inc. NEWAY, BLAINE GIRMA 3735 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 27, 2023
18274251 LOW-COST NOVEL ADSORBENT WITH HIGH CHLORIDE REMOVAL CAPACITY Sud Chemie India Pvt Ltd. SHERMAN, ERIC SCOTT 1736 §103 Non-Final OA 28d Pending Jul 26, 2023
18200915 Apparatus and Methods for Deployment of Welding Repair Systems for Railroad Trackwork Holland, L.P. WEN, KEVIN GUANHUA 3761 §103 Final Rejection 16d overdue Pending May 23, 2023

Managing Scherrer Patent & Trademark Law P.C.'s Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Scherrer Patent & Trademark Law P.C.'s patent allowance rate?

83.4% of resolved applications prosecuted by Scherrer Patent & Trademark Law P.C. were allowed, across 820 applications in USPTO records.

How many office actions does Scherrer Patent & Trademark Law P.C. average before allowance?

2.94 office actions per allowed application on average.

How many pending office actions does Scherrer Patent & Trademark Law P.C. have?

12 pending office actions as of October 2026, for 10 clients, before 12 examiners in 10 art units.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month