Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Shimokaji & Associates, P.C.

Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

6 pending office actions • 5 clients • 6 examiners • 4 art units • 0 of 6 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

SHIMOKAJI & ASSOCIATES, P.C. has 6 pending office actions in Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering and 967 career applications. The record combines a current device and mechanical docket with a defined application history.

The resolved allowance rate is 89.02%, and allowed matters averaged 2.57 office actions per allowance. The allowance rate measures resolved outcomes, while the action average measures examination activity associated with allowed matters. Practitioners can use the figures to distinguish the current workload from historical results and to assess the response activity reflected in matters that reached allowance.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=967 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

89.0%
Allowance Rate
n=967
+0.51σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=967
2.6
OAs to Allowance
n=778
-0.59σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=778
916 days
Time to Allowance
n=778
-1.2pp
Interview Lift
n=967
15.4%
RCE Rate
n=967
1.8%
Appeal Rate
n=967

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

85.5%
§101 Overcome
n=83
88.7%
§102 Overcome
n=256
87.2%
§103 Overcome
n=460
90.7%
§112 Overcome
n=333

Specialization & Scale

G06F, H04N, H04M
Top CPC Subclasses
16%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=967
1
Practitioners
n=967
967.0
Apps / Practitioner
n=967

Portfolio Summary

6
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
4
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

2
Hard (33%)
2
Medium (33%)
2
Easy (33%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other1 (17%)
§103 only2 (33%)
§112 only2 (33%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (17%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

1
Life Sciences
17% of docket
1
Information Tech
17% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
1
Semiconductors
17% of docket
3
Mechanical / Eng
50% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

60 h
Manual time on pending OAs
12 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
21 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.5 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
BRADEN, GRACE VICTORIA 1 92.1% +10.7%
MICHALSKI, SEAN M 1 53.4% +12.8%
RILEY, JONATHAN G 1 52.2% +30.1%
LEWIS, PATRICK T 1 74.0% +14.5%
OLSON, JENNIFER MAR B 1 55.4% +21.2%
MACFARLANE, EVAN H 1 50.7% +42.3%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18981559 CHIP VERIFICATION METHOD BASED ON SPI BRADEN, GRACE VICTORIA —

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18648673 DEVICE FOR FLATTENING, CONVEYING AND CUTTING METAL WIRES INTO GRANULES RILEY, JONATHAN G —
18689409 SUPERABSORBENT HYDROGELS WITH LIPASE INHIBITOR LEWIS, PATRICK T —

Interview Candidates (6)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 6 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18498497 QUICK-INSTALLATION SOUNDPROOF CABIN AND ASSEMBLING METHOD THEREOF OLSON, JENNIFER MAR B 4d overdue
18849480 SHAVING SYSTEM MICHALSKI, SEAN M 29d
18981559 CHIP VERIFICATION METHOD BASED ON SPI BRADEN, GRACE VICTORIA —
18648673 DEVICE FOR FLATTENING, CONVEYING AND CUTTING METAL WIRES INTO GRANULES RILEY, JONATHAN G —
18689409 SUPERABSORBENT HYDROGELS WITH LIPASE INHIBITOR LEWIS, PATRICK T —
18498521 CUTTING EQUIPMENT FOR METAL STRIP MACFARLANE, EVAN H —

Client Portfolio (5 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
37243
21121
16911
28371

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18981559 CHIP VERIFICATION METHOD BASED ON SPI Ipgoal Microelectronics (Sichuan) Co., Ltd. BRADEN, GRACE VICTORIA 2112 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Dec 15, 2024
18849480 SHAVING SYSTEM Wenzhou Meibo Technology Co., Ltd. MICHALSKI, SEAN M 3724 §112 Final Rejection 29d Pending Sep 21, 2024
18648673 DEVICE FOR FLATTENING, CONVEYING AND CUTTING METAL WIRES INTO GRANULES Dongguan Sibeifu Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd. RILEY, JONATHAN G 3724 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 29, 2024
18689409 SUPERABSORBENT HYDROGELS WITH LIPASE INHIBITOR Junion Labs Pte. Ltd. LEWIS, PATRICK T 1691 §101§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 05, 2024
18498497 QUICK-INSTALLATION SOUNDPROOF CABIN AND ASSEMBLING METHOD THEREOF Dongguan Kingwells Test Equipment Manufacturing Limited OLSON, JENNIFER MAR B 2837 §103 Final Rejection 4d overdue Pending Oct 31, 2023
18498521 CUTTING EQUIPMENT FOR METAL STRIP Dongguan Sibeifu Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd. MACFARLANE, EVAN H 3724 §112 Final Rejection — Pending Oct 31, 2023

Managing Shimokaji & Associates, P.C.'s Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Shimokaji & Associates, P.C.'s patent allowance rate?

89.0% of resolved applications prosecuted by Shimokaji & Associates, P.C. were allowed, across 967 applications in USPTO records.

How many office actions does Shimokaji & Associates, P.C. average before allowance?

2.57 office actions per allowed application on average.

How many pending office actions does Shimokaji & Associates, P.C. have?

6 pending office actions as of October 2026, for 5 clients, before 6 examiners in 4 art units.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month