Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
18 pending office actions • 1 client • 17 examiners • 13 art units • 0 of 18 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 38 patents granted in the last 365 days
This profile covers Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems and has 16 pending office actions. Its career record includes 13110 applications, with a resolved allowance rate of 88.55%. The data combines an active docket with a large historical application record.
The average of 2.82 office actions per allowance provides a separate measure of prosecution interaction for allowed matters. Practitioners can use the allowance rate to assess historical outcomes and the average to plan response resources. The pending matters represent current activity and should not be treated as part of the resolved-rate calculation.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 6 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 6 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 3 (17%) |
| §103 only | 8 (44%) |
| Double-patenting only | 1 (6%) |
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 6 (33%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| ARTIMEZ, DANA FERREN | 2 | 57.4% | +35.5% |
| BEAN, JARED C | 1 | 62.3% | +42.0% |
| LEWANDROSKI, SARA J | 1 | 80.7% | +9.7% |
| GORDON, MATHEW FRANKLIN | 1 | 72.5% | +12.1% |
| BRADY III, PATRICK MICHAEL | 1 | 54.4% | +38.3% |
| ROBERSON, JASON R | 1 | 73.8% | +22.2% |
| PATEL, YOGESHKUMAR G | 1 | 83.6% | +3.2% |
| KC, SAGAR | 1 | 86.8% | +5.2% |
| WHITTINGTON, JESS G | 1 | 73.0% | +17.7% |
| SHAFI, MUHAMMAD | 1 | 88.9% | +16.9% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19296176 | Systems And Methods For Adjusting Flight Control Of An Unmanned Aerial Vehicle | LEWANDROSKI, SARA J | — |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18533058 | Automated Pre-Flight Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Inspection | ALZATEEMEH, HUSSAM ALDEEN | 16d overdue |
| 18999396 | Variable Condition Motor Controller | SHAFI, MUHAMMAD | 10d overdue |
| 18318430 | Autonomous Operation Of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles | KUJUNDZIC, DINO | 13d |
| 19285228 | Distributed Map Generation for Multiple Unmanned Aerial Vehicles | ARTIMEZ, DANA FERREN | — |
| 19285220 | Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Path Determination | ARTIMEZ, DANA FERREN | — |
| 19229145 | Multipoint Cable Cam System And Method | GORDON, MATHEW FRANKLIN | — |
| 19028228 | Noise Cancellation For Aerial Vehicle | PATEL, YOGESHKUMAR G | — |
| 19028421 | MAP VIEW | KC, SAGAR | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18999396 | Variable Condition Motor Controller | SHAFI, MUHAMMAD | 10d overdue |
| 19317701 | Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) Controller | BEAN, JARED C | — |
| 19285228 | Distributed Map Generation for Multiple Unmanned Aerial Vehicles | ARTIMEZ, DANA FERREN | — |
| 19285220 | Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Path Determination | ARTIMEZ, DANA FERREN | — |
| 19229145 | Multipoint Cable Cam System And Method | GORDON, MATHEW FRANKLIN | — |
| 19228430 | Security Key For Unmanned Aerial Vehicle | BRADY III, PATRICK MICHAEL | — |
| 19064197 | Autonomous Aerial Navigation In Low-Light And No-Light Conditions | ROBERSON, JASON R | — |
| 19028077 | Data Logging In Aerial Platform | WHITTINGTON, JESS G | — |
| Client (Assignee) | Pending OAs |
|---|---|
| Skydio, Inc. | 18 |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3669 | 2 |
| 3667 | 2 |
| 3665 | 2 |
| 3666 | 2 |
| 3661 | 1 |
| 3657 | 1 |
| 3626 | 1 |
| 2896 | 1 |
| 3647 | 1 |
| 3662 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Client | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19317701 | Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) Controller | Skydio, Inc. | BEAN, JARED C | 3669 | §103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Sep 03, 2025 |
| 19296176 | Systems And Methods For Adjusting Flight Control Of An Unmanned Aerial Vehicle | Skydio, Inc. | LEWANDROSKI, SARA J | 3661 | DP | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Aug 11, 2025 |
| 19285228 | Distributed Map Generation for Multiple Unmanned Aerial Vehicles | Skydio, Inc. | ARTIMEZ, DANA FERREN | 3667 | §101§103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jul 30, 2025 |
| 19285220 | Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Path Determination | Skydio, Inc. | ARTIMEZ, DANA FERREN | 3667 | §103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jul 30, 2025 |
| 19229145 | Multipoint Cable Cam System And Method | Skydio, Inc. | GORDON, MATHEW FRANKLIN | 3665 | §102§103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jun 05, 2025 |
| 19228430 | Security Key For Unmanned Aerial Vehicle | Skydio, Inc. | BRADY III, PATRICK MICHAEL | 3665 | §103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jun 04, 2025 |
| 19064197 | Autonomous Aerial Navigation In Low-Light And No-Light Conditions | Skydio, Inc. | ROBERSON, JASON R | 3669 | §103 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Feb 26, 2025 |
| 19028228 | Noise Cancellation For Aerial Vehicle | Skydio, Inc. | PATEL, YOGESHKUMAR G | §102§103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jan 17, 2025 | |
| 19028421 | MAP VIEW | Skydio, Inc. | KC, SAGAR | 3657 | §101§102§103Other | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jan 17, 2025 |
| 19028077 | Data Logging In Aerial Platform | Skydio, Inc. | WHITTINGTON, JESS G | 3666 | §103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jan 17, 2025 |
| 18999396 | Variable Condition Motor Controller | Skydio, Inc. | SHAFI, MUHAMMAD | 3666 | §103§112 | Final Rejection | 10d overdue | Pending | Dec 23, 2024 |
| 18892296 | Unmanned Aerial Vehicle-Based Semantic Understanding For Structure Inspection | Skydio, Inc. | CHEN, WENREN | 3626 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 4d overdue | Pending | Sep 20, 2024 |
| 18776086 | Vision Systems For Unmanned Aerial Vehicles | Skydio, Inc. | NIRJHAR, NASIM NAZRUL | 2896 | §103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jul 17, 2024 |
| 18409644 | Attachment Interface And Attachments For An Unmanned Aerial Vehicle | Skydio, Inc. | HUTCHENS, CHRISTOPHER D. | 3647 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 19d | Pending | Jan 10, 2024 |
| 18533058 | Automated Pre-Flight Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Inspection | Skydio, Inc. | ALZATEEMEH, HUSSAM ALDEEN | 3662 | §101§103 | Final Rejection | 16d overdue | Pending | Dec 07, 2023 |
| 18318421 | Dock Support For Unmanned Aerial Vehicles | Skydio, Inc. | BERHANU, SAMUEL | 2859 | §103 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | May 16, 2023 |
| 18318430 | Autonomous Operation Of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles | Skydio, Inc. | KUJUNDZIC, DINO | 3658 | §103§112 | Non-Final OA | 13d | Pending | May 16, 2023 |
| 17400091 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DETERMINING PREDICTED RISK FOR A FLIGHT PATH OF AN UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE | Skydio, Inc. | DEBNATH, NUPUR | 2186 | §103 | Final Rejection | 36d | Pending | Aug 11, 2021 |
IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial88.5% of resolved applications prosecuted by Skydio, Inc. AT Young Basile were allowed, across 13,110 applications in USPTO records.
2.82 office actions per allowed application on average.
18 pending office actions as of October 2026, for 1 client, before 17 examiners in 13 art units.
