Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Smith Patent, LLC

Technology area: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals

7 pending office actions • 7 clients • 7 examiners • 7 art units • 0 of 7 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

SMITH PATENT, LLC has managed 442 career applications with a focus on the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals technology area. The firm maintains a resolved allowance rate of 86.35 percent. This performance is achieved with an average of 3.76 office actions per allowance. These metrics provide a basis for understanding the firm's prosecution history.

Currently, the firm has 7 pending office actions. This volume of work follows a history of 442 career applications. The 86.35 percent resolved allowance rate indicates the firm's results in its technology area. Practitioners can use the 3.76 average office actions per allowance to set expectations for prosecution timelines in Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals.

The 7 pending office actions represent the firm's current workload. The firm demonstrates experience in its field through its historical record of applications. The average office actions per allowance provides a metric for the effort required to reach a resolution. These data points offer a view of the firm's historical and current prosecution activity for its clients.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=442 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

86.4%
Allowance Rate
n=442
+0.90σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=442
3.8
OAs to Allowance
n=329
-0.18σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=329
1113 days
Time to Allowance
n=329
+16.8pp
Interview Lift
n=442
22.6%
RCE Rate
n=442
1.1%
Appeal Rate
n=442

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

84.8%
§101 Overcome
n=33
85.0%
§102 Overcome
n=133
86.2%
§103 Overcome
n=224
89.2%
§112 Overcome
n=213

Specialization & Scale

A61K, A61B, A61P
Top CPC Subclasses
43%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=442
0
Practitioners
n=442
—
Apps / Practitioner
n=442 (min 20)

Portfolio Summary

7
Total Pending OAs
5
Non-Final OAs
2
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

2
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

4
Hard (57%)
1
Medium (14%)
2
Easy (29%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (14%)
§112 only2 (29%)
Multi-statute (no §101)4 (57%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

6
Life Sciences
86% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
14% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

70 h
Manual time on pending OAs
14 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
24 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.6 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
CHOI, PETER Y 1 20.4% +32.5%
HOLLAND, PAUL J 1 57.3% +64.7%
MUTCHLER, CHRISTOPHER JOHN 1 55.7% +22.7%
FAUST, AMBER KATHLEEN 1 61.1% +53.6%
REDDIG, PETER J 1 58.0% +40.2%
MERCIER, MELISSA S 1 72.1% +5.8%
METCALF, MATTHEW CURRAN 1 37.5% +71.4%

Hard Cases (4)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18818331 Composition Comprising an Alkyd Resin CHOI, PETER Y —
18701828 AQUEOUS FORMULATIONS OF AN ANTI-CD22 ANTIBODY AND USES THEREOF FAUST, AMBER KATHLEEN —
18571406 APPLICATION OF HCMV GP34- AND GP68-SPECIFIC ANTIBODIES AND FRAGMENTS THEREOF FOR PREVENTION, THERAPY AND DIAGNOSTICS OF HCMV DISEASE REDDIG, PETER J —
18044948 CHIMERIC SENSOR PROTEIN AND METHODS OF USE THEREOF METCALF, MATTHEW CURRAN —

Interview Candidates (6)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 6 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18657444 Methods, Systems, Devices and Components for the Treatment of Stroke in a Patient with Interferential Cranial Electrical Stimulation MUTCHLER, CHRISTOPHER JOHN 31d overdue
18818331 Composition Comprising an Alkyd Resin CHOI, PETER Y —
18711814 BIOCATALYSTS AND METHODS FOR THE SYNTHESIS OF PREGABALIN INTERMEDIATES HOLLAND, PAUL J —
18701828 AQUEOUS FORMULATIONS OF AN ANTI-CD22 ANTIBODY AND USES THEREOF FAUST, AMBER KATHLEEN —
18571406 APPLICATION OF HCMV GP34- AND GP68-SPECIFIC ANTIBODIES AND FRAGMENTS THEREOF FOR PREVENTION, THERAPY AND DIAGNOSTICS OF HCMV DISEASE REDDIG, PETER J —
18044948 CHIMERIC SENSOR PROTEIN AND METHODS OF USE THEREOF METCALF, MATTHEW CURRAN —

Client Portfolio (7 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
17861
16561
37961
16431
16461
16151
16471

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18818331 Composition Comprising an Alkyd Resin Munditia Technologies GmbH CHOI, PETER Y 1786 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 28, 2024
18711814 BIOCATALYSTS AND METHODS FOR THE SYNTHESIS OF PREGABALIN INTERMEDIATES Enzymaster (Ningbo) Bio-Engineering Co., Ltd. HOLLAND, PAUL J 1656 §112 Non-Final OA — Pending May 20, 2024
18657444 Methods, Systems, Devices and Components for the Treatment of Stroke in a Patient with Interferential Cranial Electrical Stimulation Makous Research, LLC MUTCHLER, CHRISTOPHER JOHN 3796 §103 Final Rejection 31d overdue Pending May 07, 2024
18701828 AQUEOUS FORMULATIONS OF AN ANTI-CD22 ANTIBODY AND USES THEREOF Sinomab Bioscience Limited FAUST, AMBER KATHLEEN 1643 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 16, 2024
18571406 APPLICATION OF HCMV GP34- AND GP68-SPECIFIC ANTIBODIES AND FRAGMENTS THEREOF FOR PREVENTION, THERAPY AND DIAGNOSTICS OF HCMV DISEASE UNIVERSITY OF RIJEKA FACULTY OF MEDICINE REDDIG, PETER J 1646 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 18, 2023
17794886 TRANSDERMAL THERAPEUTIC SYSTEM COMPRISING THE INGREDIENT ROTIGOTINE AND AT LEAST ONE NON-AMINE-RESISTANT SILICONE ADHESIVE Luye Pharma Switzerland AG MERCIER, MELISSA S 1615 §112 Final Rejection 58d overdue Pending Mar 29, 2023
18044948 CHIMERIC SENSOR PROTEIN AND METHODS OF USE THEREOF Universitaet Leipzig METCALF, MATTHEW CURRAN 1647 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 10, 2023

Managing Smith Patent, LLC's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Smith Patent, LLC's patent allowance rate?

86.3% of resolved applications prosecuted by Smith Patent, LLC were allowed, across 442 applications in USPTO records.

How many office actions does Smith Patent, LLC average before allowance?

3.76 office actions per allowed application on average.

How many pending office actions does Smith Patent, LLC have?

7 pending office actions as of October 2026, for 7 clients, before 7 examiners in 7 art units.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month