Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Sorell, Lenna & Schmidt LLP

Technology areas: Chemistry & Materials • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

24 pending office actions • 12 clients • 23 examiners • 19 art units • 0 of 24 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Sorell, Lenna & Schmidt, LLP has 24 pending office actions in Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering and 826 career applications. This combines a current response workload with a substantial application record in the stated technology area.

The resolved allowance rate is 92.32%, while the average is 4.38 office actions per allowance. The first measure addresses the outcome of resolved matters, and the second indicates the amount of recorded examination activity associated with matters that reached allowance.

For practitioners, the profile supports a two-part review. Capacity planning should account for the pending docket, while historical assessment should consider both the allowance result and action frequency. The figures do not explain matter complexity or the procedural reasons for individual actions.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=826 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

92.3%
Allowance Rate
n=826
+0.82σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=826
4.4
OAs to Allowance
n=565
+0.22σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=565
1051 days
Time to Allowance
n=565
+4.7pp
Interview Lift
n=826
35.5%
RCE Rate
n=826
0.3%
Appeal Rate
n=826

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

90.9%
§101 Overcome
n=44
79.0%
§102 Overcome
n=257
82.9%
§103 Overcome
n=426
83.7%
§112 Overcome
n=362

Specialization & Scale

A61K, A47C, A61B
Top CPC Subclasses
19%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=826
3
Practitioners
n=826
275.3
Apps / Practitioner
n=826

Portfolio Summary

24
Total Pending OAs
13
Non-Final OAs
10
Final Rejections
1
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 8 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

2
Overdue
1
Due this week
1
Due this month
4
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 8 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (2)Due ≤ 7 days (1)Due ≤ 30 days (1)Due ≤ 60 days (4)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

13
Hard (54%)
9
Medium (38%)
2
Easy (8%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other1 (4%)
§103 only5 (21%)
§102 only1 (4%)
§112 only2 (8%)
Double-patenting + other3 (12%)
Multi-statute (no §101)12 (50%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

10
Life Sciences
42% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
14
Mechanical / Eng
58% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

240 h
Manual time on pending OAs
48 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
84 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
2.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
HUSON, MONICA ANNE 2 79.6% +13.5%
LACHICA, ERICSON M 1 29.8% +35.2%
MCCLURE, MORGAN J 1 47.0% +32.3%
ROERSMA, ANDREW MARK 1 63.5% +24.2%
KURILLA, ERIC J 1 70.7% +25.8%
HICKS, ROBERT J 1 72.1% +3.8%
SWIER, WAYNE K. 1 67.9% +19.2%
LIU, TRACY 1 54.5% +26.9%
BAEK, BONG-SOOK 1 41.6% +69.9%
BARRY, DAPHNE MARIE 1 76.0% +28.3%

Hard Cases (13)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18553368 Transdermal Systems having low dose estrogen and methods of making and use HOLT, ANDRIAE M 23d overdue
18866059 TOUCHLESS FAUCET USING HAND TRACKING BARRY, DAPHNE MARIE 6d
17461862 METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS COMPRISING TAU OLIGOMERS BALLARD, KIMBERLY 34d
19236048 CONTAINER AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURE LACHICA, ERICSON M 55d
18432224 SHELVING SYSTEMS TRAN, HANH VAN 56d
19231899 PILLOW WITH GUSSET HAVING MULTIPLE POROSITY PORTS MCCLURE, MORGAN J —
18960339 METHODS OF MAKING AN ORAL APPLIANCE SWIER, WAYNE K. —
18884886 BODY SUPPORT SYSTEM SHANSKE, JASON D —

Interview Candidates (10)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18866059 TOUCHLESS FAUCET USING HAND TRACKING BARRY, DAPHNE MARIE 6d
19053038 AMBIENT BED HAVING A HEAT RECLAIM SYSTEM KURILLA, ERIC J 23d
19236048 CONTAINER AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURE LACHICA, ERICSON M 55d
19231899 PILLOW WITH GUSSET HAVING MULTIPLE POROSITY PORTS MCCLURE, MORGAN J —
19196047 CONTAINER AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURE HUSON, MONICA ANNE —
19169121 DRAWER ASSEMBLY ROERSMA, ANDREW MARK —
18960339 METHODS OF MAKING AN ORAL APPLIANCE SWIER, WAYNE K. —
18955395 TRACE ELEMENT COMPOSITIONS, METHODS OF MAKING AND USE LIU, TRACY —

Client Portfolio (12 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
36732
17422
36372
16142
37352
17921
36191
37361
17481
16111

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19236048 CONTAINER AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURE Ring Container Technologies, LLC LACHICA, ERICSON M 1792 §103§112Other Non-Final OA 55d Pending Jun 12, 2025
19231899 PILLOW WITH GUSSET HAVING MULTIPLE POROSITY PORTS BEDGEAR, LLC MCCLURE, MORGAN J 3673 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 09, 2025
19196047 CONTAINER AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURE Ring Container Technologies, LLC HUSON, MONICA ANNE 1742 §112 Non-Final OA — Pending May 01, 2025
19169121 DRAWER ASSEMBLY Dejana Truck And Utility Equipment Co., Inc. ROERSMA, ANDREW MARK 3637 §112Other Final Rejection — Pending Apr 03, 2025
19053038 AMBIENT BED HAVING A HEAT RECLAIM SYSTEM BEDGEAR, LLC KURILLA, ERIC J 3619 §102 Final Rejection 23d Pending Feb 13, 2025
19050379 CONTAINER SYSTEM AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURE Ring Container Technologies, LLC HICKS, ROBERT J 3736 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Feb 11, 2025
18960339 METHODS OF MAKING AN ORAL APPLIANCE Emanate Biomedical, Inc. SWIER, WAYNE K. 1748 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 26, 2024
18955395 TRACE ELEMENT COMPOSITIONS, METHODS OF MAKING AND USE American Regent, Inc. LIU, TRACY 1614 §103§112DP Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 21, 2024
18955379 TRACE ELEMENT COMPOSITIONS, METHODS OF MAKING AND USE American Regent, Inc. BAEK, BONG-SOOK 1611 §102§103§112DP Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 21, 2024
18866059 TOUCHLESS FAUCET USING HAND TRACKING Terravox Industries LLC BARRY, DAPHNE MARIE 3753 §102§103 Non-Final OA 6d Pending Nov 14, 2024
18944241 MATTRESS ASSEMBLY AND METHOD BEDGEAR, LLC HALL, LUKE F 3673 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Nov 12, 2024
18884886 BODY SUPPORT SYSTEM BEDGEAR, LLC SHANSKE, JASON D 3614 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 13, 2024
18638958 CONTAINER AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURE Ring Container Technologies, LLC HUSON, MONICA ANNE 1742 §102§103DP Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 18, 2024
18432224 SHELVING SYSTEMS Dejana Truck & Utility Equipment Company, LLC TRAN, HANH VAN 3637 §103§112 Non-Final OA 56d Pending Feb 05, 2024
18553368 Transdermal Systems having low dose estrogen and methods of making and use Viatris Inc. HOLT, ANDRIAE M 1614 §102§103 Final Rejection 23d overdue Pending Sep 29, 2023
18350272 HEAT TRANSFER MIXTURE Ht Materials Science (Ip) Limited DIAZ, MATTHEW R 1761 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 11, 2023
18125564 CONTAINER AND PACKAGING SYSTEM Ring Container Technologies, LLC BATTISTI, DEREK J 3734 §103 Final Rejection 60d Pending Mar 23, 2023
17922691 AN AUTO-INJECTOR DEVICE FOR DELIVERING MEDICAMENTS BIOCON LIMITED MEDWAY, SCOTT J 3783 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Nov 01, 2022
17950365 CONTAINER SYSTEM AND METHOD Ring Container Technologies LLC KIRSCH, ANDREW THOMAS 3733 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 22, 2022
17778564 ORAL APPLIANCE FOR DELIVERY OF AN ANTIMICROBIAL COMPOSITION Emanate Biomedical, Inc. EIDE, HEIDI MARIE 3772 §103§112 Final Rejection — Pending May 20, 2022
17527530 CONTAINER AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURE Ring Container Technologies, LLC SANGHERA, SYMREN K 3735 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 16, 2021
17488572 COOLING MATERIAL BEDGEAR, LLC PIZIALI, ANDREW T 1789 §103§112 Final Rejection — Pending Sep 29, 2021
17461862 METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS COMPRISING TAU OLIGOMERS Oligomerix, Inc. BALLARD, KIMBERLY 1675 §101§112Other Non-Final OA 34d Pending Aug 30, 2021
17403050 CONTAINER AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURE Ring Container Technologies, LLC POON, ROBERT 3735 §103 Final Rejection 31d overdue Pending Aug 16, 2021

Managing Sorell, Lenna & Schmidt LLP's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Sorell, Lenna & Schmidt LLP's patent allowance rate?

92.3% of resolved applications prosecuted by Sorell, Lenna & Schmidt LLP were allowed, across 826 applications in USPTO records.

How many office actions does Sorell, Lenna & Schmidt LLP average before allowance?

4.38 office actions per allowed application on average.

How many pending office actions does Sorell, Lenna & Schmidt LLP have?

24 pending office actions as of October 2026, for 12 clients, before 23 examiners in 19 art units.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month