Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Straub & Straub - Charter

Technology area: Networking & Security

9 pending office actions • 1 client • 8 examiners • 8 art units • 0 of 9 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 39 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Straub & Straub - Charter has 9 pending office actions in Networking & Security and 353 career applications. Its resolved allowance rate is 98.86%, indicating that almost all resolved matters reached allowance.

The practice averages 2.37 office actions per allowance. This shows that the favorable outcome rate does not mean successful matters were uniformly resolved without examination activity. The application base is focused, while the current docket provides a separate indication of present workload. Together, the figures support a favorable historical outcome assessment with continued attention to prosecution strategy.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=353 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

98.9%
Allowance Rate
n=353
+0.57σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=353
2.4
OAs to Allowance
n=261
-0.52σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=261
874 days
Time to Allowance
n=261
-0.8pp
Interview Lift
n=353
14.4%
RCE Rate
n=353
9.2%
Appeal Rate
n=353

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

—
§101 Overcome
n=15 (min 20)
81.1%
§102 Overcome
n=74
88.0%
§103 Overcome
n=159
91.4%
§112 Overcome
n=70

Specialization & Scale

H04W, H04L, H04B
Top CPC Subclasses
86%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=353
0
Practitioners
n=353
—
Apps / Practitioner
n=353 (min 20)

Portfolio Summary

9
Total Pending OAs
7
Non-Final OAs
2
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

3
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (3)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (11%)
4
Medium (44%)
3
Easy (33%)
1
Unknown (11%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only4 (44%)
§112 only1 (11%)
Double-patenting only2 (22%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (11%)
No statute on record1 (11%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
8
Information Tech
89% of docket
1
Communications
11% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

90 h
Manual time on pending OAs
18 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
31 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.8 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
DIVITO, WALTER J 2 84.2% +9.8%
ODOM, CURTIS B 1 87.2% +11.4%
CASTANEYRA, RICARDO H 1 74.5% +22.5%
PHUNKULH, BOB A 1 89.4% +9.4%
GEORGANDELLIS, ANDREW C 1 56.5% +40.2%
DALENCOURT, YVES 1 84.2% -5.5%
FAYED, RASHA K 1 63.4% +25.8%
DAVIS, ZACHARY A 1 53.9% +21.9%

Quick Wins (5)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18085539 Methods and Apparatus for Supporting the Communication of Path Switching Capability Information Between User Equipment and a Network Device To Enable Efficient Switching of Multi-Access (MA) Traffic Between Non-3GPP Access Paths DIVITO, WALTER J 37d overdue
18085548 Methods and Apparatus Relating to Communication of Path Switching Capability Information Between a Network Device and a UE device To Enable Efficient Switching of Multi-Access (MA) Traffic Between Non-3GPP Access Paths DIVITO, WALTER J 37d overdue
18631036 Methods and Apparatus for Enabling Low Latency, Low Loss, and Scalable Throughput (L4S) in Wireless Local Area Networks (WLANs) Through Use of Stream Classification Service DALENCOURT, YVES 15d overdue
19019416 METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR COMMUNICATING AND DISPLAYING SHORT MESSAGE SERVICE (SMS) MESSAGES ODOM, CURTIS B —
18788101 METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR DYNAMICALLY CONTROLLING SUBCARRIER SPACING ON A COMMUNICATIONS LINK WITH A MODEM PHUNKULH, BOB A —

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17590418 METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR AUTOMATICALLY SECURING COMMUNICATIONS BETWEEN A MEDIATION DEVICE AND POINT OF INTERCEPT DAVIS, ZACHARY A —

Interview Candidates (5)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19019416 METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR COMMUNICATING AND DISPLAYING SHORT MESSAGE SERVICE (SMS) MESSAGES ODOM, CURTIS B —
18801681 METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR REDUCING DOWNLINK TRANSMISSION POWER IN A WIRELESS SYSTEM CASTANEYRA, RICARDO H —
18631038 Methods and Apparatus for Using Mirrored Stream Classification Service to Enable Low Latency, Low Loss, and Scalable Throughput (L4S) in Wireless Local Area Networks (WLANs) GEORGANDELLIS, ANDREW C —
17990175 Channel Access Mechanism For Sidelink In Unlicensed Spectrum FAYED, RASHA K —
17590418 METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR AUTOMATICALLY SECURING COMMUNICATIONS BETWEEN A MEDIATION DEVICE AND POINT OF INTERCEPT DAVIS, ZACHARY A —

Client Portfolio (1 client)

Client (Assignee)Pending OAs
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS OPERATING, LLC 9

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
24652
26311
24731
24121
24591
24571
24131
24921

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19019416 METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR COMMUNICATING AND DISPLAYING SHORT MESSAGE SERVICE (SMS) MESSAGES Charter Communications Operating, LLC ODOM, CURTIS B 2631 §112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 13, 2025
18801681 METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR REDUCING DOWNLINK TRANSMISSION POWER IN A WIRELESS SYSTEM Charter Communications Operating, LLC CASTANEYRA, RICARDO H 2473 Other Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 12, 2024
18788101 METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR DYNAMICALLY CONTROLLING SUBCARRIER SPACING ON A COMMUNICATIONS LINK WITH A MODEM Charter Communications Operating, LLC PHUNKULH, BOB A 2412 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 29, 2024
18631038 Methods and Apparatus for Using Mirrored Stream Classification Service to Enable Low Latency, Low Loss, and Scalable Throughput (L4S) in Wireless Local Area Networks (WLANs) Charter Communications Operating, LLC GEORGANDELLIS, ANDREW C 2459 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Apr 09, 2024
18631036 Methods and Apparatus for Enabling Low Latency, Low Loss, and Scalable Throughput (L4S) in Wireless Local Area Networks (WLANs) Through Use of Stream Classification Service Charter Communications Operating, LLC DALENCOURT, YVES 2457 §103 Non-Final OA 15d overdue Pending Apr 09, 2024
18085539 Methods and Apparatus for Supporting the Communication of Path Switching Capability Information Between User Equipment and a Network Device To Enable Efficient Switching of Multi-Access (MA) Traffic Between Non-3GPP Access Paths Charter Communications Operating, LLC DIVITO, WALTER J 2465 DP Non-Final OA 37d overdue Pending Dec 20, 2022
18085548 Methods and Apparatus Relating to Communication of Path Switching Capability Information Between a Network Device and a UE device To Enable Efficient Switching of Multi-Access (MA) Traffic Between Non-3GPP Access Paths Charter Communications Operating, LLC DIVITO, WALTER J 2465 DP Non-Final OA 37d overdue Pending Dec 20, 2022
17990175 Channel Access Mechanism For Sidelink In Unlicensed Spectrum Charter Communications Operating, LLC FAYED, RASHA K 2413 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 18, 2022
17590418 METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR AUTOMATICALLY SECURING COMMUNICATIONS BETWEEN A MEDIATION DEVICE AND POINT OF INTERCEPT Charter Communications Operating, LLC DAVIS, ZACHARY A 2492 §103§112 Final Rejection — Pending Feb 01, 2022

Managing Straub & Straub - Charter's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Straub & Straub - Charter's patent allowance rate?

98.9% of resolved applications prosecuted by Straub & Straub - Charter were allowed, across 353 applications in USPTO records.

How many office actions does Straub & Straub - Charter average before allowance?

2.37 office actions per allowed application on average.

How many pending office actions does Straub & Straub - Charter have?

9 pending office actions as of October 2026, for 1 client, before 8 examiners in 8 art units.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month