Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Stupp Associates, LLC

Technology areas: Computing & Software • Communications • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

10 pending office actions • 4 clients • 9 examiners • 9 art units • 0 of 10 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Stupp Associates, LLC has 9 pending office actions in Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems and 437 career applications. Its resolved allowance rate is 89.45%, indicating that most resolved matters reached allowance.

The practice averages 2.75 office actions per allowance. This suggests that successful matters often required continued examination, despite the favorable allowance rate. The application base is focused, and the pending docket supplies a current workload measure. Practitioners can use the full profile to evaluate historical outcomes alongside the likely need for active prosecution management.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=437 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

89.4%
Allowance Rate
n=437
+0.45σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=437
2.8
OAs to Allowance
n=229
-0.44σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=229
886 days
Time to Allowance
n=229
+7.0pp
Interview Lift
n=437
27.0%
RCE Rate
n=437
4.9%
Appeal Rate
n=437

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

62.5%
§101 Overcome
n=40
75.5%
§102 Overcome
n=94
75.7%
§103 Overcome
n=173
72.7%
§112 Overcome
n=77

Specialization & Scale

G06F, H04L, G01S
Top CPC Subclasses
30%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=437
1
Practitioners
n=437
437.0
Apps / Practitioner
n=437

Portfolio Summary

10
Total Pending OAs
6
Non-Final OAs
4
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

4
Hard (40%)
5
Medium (50%)
0
Easy (0%)
1
Unknown (10%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other1 (10%)
§103 only5 (50%)
Multi-statute (no §101)3 (30%)
No statute on record1 (10%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
2
Information Tech
20% of docket
2
Communications
20% of docket
1
Semiconductors
10% of docket
5
Mechanical / Eng
50% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

100 h
Manual time on pending OAs
20 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
35 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.9 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
GREGORY, BERNARR E 2 90.5% +6.7%
KURR, JASON R 1 75.7% +20.4%
AUSTIN, JAMIE H 1 24.9% +32.7%
DANG, PHONG H 1 81.0% +10.7%
VANDERPUYE, KENNETH N 1 27.8% +4.4%
LE, HAILEY R 1 81.4% +9.6%
CLEARY, THOMAS J 1 72.8% +15.7%
LAM, TUAN THIEU 1 77.6% +13.1%
RHEE, ROY B 1 70.3% +21.7%

Quick Wins (3)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18979452 Universal Data Bus Serializer DANG, PHONG H 19d overdue
18899991 Optical Linearization Technique GREGORY, BERNARR E —
18767787 Generating Different Data Streams Based on Temporal Relevance LE, HAILEY R —

Hard Cases (5)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19076884 AUTOMATED ADAPTATION OF A PLAN FOR A POWER-SYSTEM PROJECT AUSTIN, JAMIE H —
18950121 CENTRALIZED OCCUPANCY DETECTION SYSTEM GREGORY, BERNARR E —
18827571 Optical Linearization Technique VANDERPUYE, KENNETH N —
18383477 Low Latency, Broadband Power-Domain Offset-Correction Signal Level Circuit Implementation LAM, TUAN THIEU —
18126414 Condition-Based Loading of a Subset of a Collision Avoidance and Detection Data Structure RHEE, ROY B —

Interview Candidates (6)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 6 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18979452 Universal Data Bus Serializer DANG, PHONG H 19d overdue
19091334 Framework for Handling Sensor Data in a Smart Home System KURR, JASON R —
19076884 AUTOMATED ADAPTATION OF A PLAN FOR A POWER-SYSTEM PROJECT AUSTIN, JAMIE H —
18667337 In-Vehicle Consumer Device Charging Network CLEARY, THOMAS J —
18383477 Low Latency, Broadband Power-Domain Offset-Correction Signal Level Circuit Implementation LAM, TUAN THIEU —
18126414 Condition-Based Loading of a Subset of a Collision Avoidance and Detection Data Structure RHEE, ROY B —

Client Portfolio (4 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
36482
26911
36251
21841
36461
26341
21751
28421
36641

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19091334 Framework for Handling Sensor Data in a Smart Home System Zuma Array Ltd. KURR, JASON R 2691 Other Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 26, 2025
19076884 AUTOMATED ADAPTATION OF A PLAN FOR A POWER-SYSTEM PROJECT Bootstraplab, LLC AUSTIN, JAMIE H 3625 §101§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 11, 2025
18979452 Universal Data Bus Serializer AyDeeKay LLC DANG, PHONG H 2184 §103 Final Rejection 19d overdue Pending Dec 12, 2024
18950121 CENTRALIZED OCCUPANCY DETECTION SYSTEM AyDeeKay LLC GREGORY, BERNARR E 3648 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 17, 2024
18899991 Optical Linearization Technique AyDeeKay LLC GREGORY, BERNARR E 3646 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 27, 2024
18827571 Optical Linearization Technique AyDeeKay LLC VANDERPUYE, KENNETH N 2634 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 06, 2024
18767787 Generating Different Data Streams Based on Temporal Relevance AyDeeKay LLC LE, HAILEY R 3648 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Jul 09, 2024
18667337 In-Vehicle Consumer Device Charging Network AyDeeKay LLC CLEARY, THOMAS J 2175 §103 Final Rejection — Pending May 17, 2024
18383477 Low Latency, Broadband Power-Domain Offset-Correction Signal Level Circuit Implementation AyDeeKay LLC LAM, TUAN THIEU 2842 §102§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 25, 2023
18126414 Condition-Based Loading of a Subset of a Collision Avoidance and Detection Data Structure Sagetech Avionics, Inc. RHEE, ROY B 3664 §103§112 Final Rejection — Pending Mar 25, 2023

Managing Stupp Associates, LLC's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Stupp Associates, LLC's patent allowance rate?

89.5% of resolved applications prosecuted by Stupp Associates, LLC were allowed, across 437 applications in USPTO records.

How many office actions does Stupp Associates, LLC average before allowance?

2.75 office actions per allowed application on average.

How many pending office actions does Stupp Associates, LLC have?

10 pending office actions as of October 2026, for 4 clients, before 9 examiners in 9 art units.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month