Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

The Caldwell Firm, LLC

Technology areas: Computing & Software • Networking & Security • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

5 pending office actions • 3 clients • 5 examiners • 5 art units • 0 of 5 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

The Caldwell Firm, LLC has 5 pending office actions in Networking & Security. The profile records 608 career applications, placing the unresolved workload within a defined prosecution base.

The resolved allowance rate is 88.17%, and the average is 3.29 office actions per allowance. Resolved matters frequently reach allowance, although several examination exchanges typically occur before that result. Practitioners may assess response sequencing for network and security claims.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=608 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

88.2%
Allowance Rate
n=608
+0.45σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=608
3.3
OAs to Allowance
n=447
-0.12σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=447
715 days
Time to Allowance
n=447
+10.0pp
Interview Lift
n=608
32.4%
RCE Rate
n=608
5.0%
Appeal Rate
n=608

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

80.8%
§101 Overcome
n=141
76.4%
§102 Overcome
n=144
83.7%
§103 Overcome
n=301
86.9%
§112 Overcome
n=153

Specialization & Scale

G06F, H04L, G06Q
Top CPC Subclasses
64%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=608
1
Practitioners
n=608
608.0
Apps / Practitioner
n=608

Portfolio Summary

5
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
3
Final Rejections
1
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

2
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

2
Hard (40%)
2
Medium (40%)
0
Easy (0%)
1
Unknown (20%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other2 (40%)
§103 only2 (40%)
No statute on record1 (20%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
4
Information Tech
80% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
20% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

50 h
Manual time on pending OAs
10 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
18 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.4 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
AMBAYE, MEWALE A 1 91.5% -1.1%
HOPE, DARRIN 1 60.9% +18.4%
LEE, GIL H 1 83.4% +28.0%
COONEY, ADAM A 1 57.8% +11.0%
HAYLES, ASHFORD S 1 66.8% +37.6%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
16560983 Methods, Systems, and Computer Program Products for Accessing a Service Via a Proxy Communications Agent LEE, GIL H —

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
16852392 METHODS, SYSTEMS, AND COMPUTER PROGRAM PRODUCTS FOR PROCESSING A CONTEXTUAL CHANNEL IDENTIFIER HOPE, DARRIN 43d overdue
15426022 SYSTEM, METHOD, AND COMPUTER PROGRAM PRODUCT FOR PRESENTING DECISION-RELATED INFORMATION HAYLES, ASHFORD S —

Interview Candidates (4)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
15813063 SYSTEM, METHOD, AND COMPUTER PROGRAM PRODUCT FOR LINKING DEVICES FOR COORDINATED OPERATION COONEY, ADAM A 46d overdue
16852392 METHODS, SYSTEMS, AND COMPUTER PROGRAM PRODUCTS FOR PROCESSING A CONTEXTUAL CHANNEL IDENTIFIER HOPE, DARRIN 43d overdue
16560983 Methods, Systems, and Computer Program Products for Accessing a Service Via a Proxy Communications Agent LEE, GIL H —
15426022 SYSTEM, METHOD, AND COMPUTER PROGRAM PRODUCT FOR PRESENTING DECISION-RELATED INFORMATION HAYLES, ASHFORD S —

Client Portfolio (3 clients)

Client (Assignee)Pending OAs
SITTING MAN, LLC 3
P4TENTS1, LLC 1
Majen Tech, LLC 1

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
24691
21781
24461
24581
36271

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
17842653 Enabling a Backup Network Interface Hardware Component in Response to a Failure Sitting MAN, LLC AMBAYE, MEWALE A 2469 Other Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 16, 2022
16852392 METHODS, SYSTEMS, AND COMPUTER PROGRAM PRODUCTS FOR PROCESSING A CONTEXTUAL CHANNEL IDENTIFIER Sitting MAN, LLC HOPE, DARRIN 2178 §101§103 Final Rejection 43d overdue Pending Apr 17, 2020
16560983 Methods, Systems, and Computer Program Products for Accessing a Service Via a Proxy Communications Agent Sitting MAN, LLC LEE, GIL H 2446 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 04, 2019
15813063 SYSTEM, METHOD, AND COMPUTER PROGRAM PRODUCT FOR LINKING DEVICES FOR COORDINATED OPERATION P4Tents1, LLC COONEY, ADAM A 2458 §103 Final Rejection 46d overdue Pending Nov 14, 2017
15426022 SYSTEM, METHOD, AND COMPUTER PROGRAM PRODUCT FOR PRESENTING DECISION-RELATED INFORMATION Majen Tech, LLC HAYLES, ASHFORD S 3627 §101§103 Final Rejection — Pending Feb 06, 2017

Managing The Caldwell Firm, LLC's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

What is The Caldwell Firm, LLC's patent allowance rate?

88.2% of resolved applications prosecuted by The Caldwell Firm, LLC were allowed, across 608 applications in USPTO records.

How many office actions does The Caldwell Firm, LLC average before allowance?

3.29 office actions per allowed application on average.

How many pending office actions does The Caldwell Firm, LLC have?

5 pending office actions as of October 2026, for 3 clients, before 5 examiners in 5 art units.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month