Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

The Grafe Law Office, P.C.

Technology areas: Chemistry & Materials • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

7 pending office actions • 5 clients • 6 examiners • 6 art units • 0 of 7 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

The Grafe Law Office, P.C. handles Chemistry & Materials matters, with 402 career applications and 7 pending office actions. Its resolved allowance rate is 66.53%, so the prosecution record reflects a lower allowance outcome than firms with rates nearer the upper end of the available profiles.

The average of 3.04 office actions per allowance indicates that allowed matters generally involve more than one examination exchange. A practitioner reviewing this profile would likely give attention to claim drafting, amendment strategy, and response sequencing, particularly where the pending matters may require continued examination work. The application total supplies useful context for the rate, while the office-action measure describes the procedural path to allowance.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=402 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

66.5%
Allowance Rate
n=402
+0.38σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=402
3.0
OAs to Allowance
n=163
-0.26σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=163
1049 days
Time to Allowance
n=163
+26.7pp
Interview Lift
n=402
12.6%
RCE Rate
n=402
1.9%
Appeal Rate
n=402

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

61.3%
§101 Overcome
n=31
64.8%
§102 Overcome
n=105
66.0%
§103 Overcome
n=156
72.7%
§112 Overcome
n=121

Specialization & Scale

A61B, B01D, C02F
Top CPC Subclasses
27%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=402
0
Practitioners
n=402
—
Apps / Practitioner
n=402 (min 20)

Portfolio Summary

7
Total Pending OAs
5
Non-Final OAs
2
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

3
Hard (43%)
3
Medium (43%)
1
Easy (14%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only3 (43%)
Double-patenting only1 (14%)
Multi-statute (no §101)3 (43%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

5
Life Sciences
71% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
2
Mechanical / Eng
29% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

70 h
Manual time on pending OAs
14 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
24 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.6 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
MENDOZA, WILSON GALLARDO 2 100.0% +0.0%
BRUTUS, JOEL F 1 72.9% +17.7%
RIVERA-CORDERO, ARLYN I 1 63.2% +26.8%
MCCULLOUGH, ERIC J. 1 31.9% +43.1%
FERNANDEZ, KATHERINE L 1 58.0% +37.8%
BOESEN, CHRISTIAN C 1 76.0% +21.1%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18751107 Spiral Element Construction Yielding Enhanced Capacity MENDOZA, WILSON GALLARDO —

Hard Cases (3)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18618730 Noninvasive Structural and Valvular Abnormality Detection System based on Flow Aberrations FERNANDEZ, KATHERINE L 1d overdue
19238022 Cardiac Function Assessment System BRUTUS, JOEL F —
18751121 SPIRAL MEMBRANE ELEMENT TAPERED PROFILE SPACERS MENDOZA, WILSON GALLARDO —

Interview Candidates (5)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18618730 Noninvasive Structural and Valvular Abnormality Detection System based on Flow Aberrations FERNANDEZ, KATHERINE L 1d overdue
19238022 Cardiac Function Assessment System BRUTUS, JOEL F —
18933032 Compositions for Engine Carbon Removal from Lubricated Components RIVERA-CORDERO, ARLYN I —
18643766 Spiral Wound Element Construction MCCULLOUGH, ERIC J. —
18338233 Systematic Creation of Fluorescent Fusion Polypeptides BOESEN, CHRISTIAN C —

Client Portfolio (5 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
17722
37971
17141
17731
37981
16841

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19238022 Cardiac Function Assessment System Medici Technologies, LLC BRUTUS, JOEL F 3797 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 13, 2025
18933032 Compositions for Engine Carbon Removal from Lubricated Components Ats Chemical, LLC RIVERA-CORDERO, ARLYN I 1714 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Oct 31, 2024
18751107 Spiral Element Construction Yielding Enhanced Capacity Aqua Membranes, Inc. MENDOZA, WILSON GALLARDO 1772 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 21, 2024
18751121 SPIRAL MEMBRANE ELEMENT TAPERED PROFILE SPACERS Aqua Membranes, Inc. MENDOZA, WILSON GALLARDO 1772 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 21, 2024
18643766 Spiral Wound Element Construction Aqua Membranes In C. MCCULLOUGH, ERIC J. 1773 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 23, 2024
18618730 Noninvasive Structural and Valvular Abnormality Detection System based on Flow Aberrations Medici Technologies, LLC FERNANDEZ, KATHERINE L 3798 §103§112 Final Rejection 1d overdue Pending Mar 27, 2024
18338233 Systematic Creation of Fluorescent Fusion Polypeptides Sandia Biotech, Inc. BOESEN, CHRISTIAN C 1684 DP Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 20, 2023

Managing The Grafe Law Office, P.C.'s Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

What is The Grafe Law Office, P.C.'s patent allowance rate?

66.5% of resolved applications prosecuted by The Grafe Law Office, P.C. were allowed, across 402 applications in USPTO records.

How many office actions does The Grafe Law Office, P.C. average before allowance?

3.04 office actions per allowed application on average.

How many pending office actions does The Grafe Law Office, P.C. have?

7 pending office actions as of October 2026, for 5 clients, before 6 examiners in 6 art units.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month