Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

The Juhasz Law Firm, P.C.

Technology areas: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals • Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics

6 pending office actions • 2 clients • 4 examiners • 4 art units • 0 of 6 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

The Juhasz Law Firm, P.C. handles Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals matters, with 194 career applications and 6 pending office actions. Its resolved allowance rate is 89.86%, indicating that allowance accounts for a substantial part of the recorded resolved outcome.

The average is 3.13 office actions per allowance. This shows that favorable resolution can still involve repeated examination exchanges, making response planning important even where the allowance rate is strong. The pending-action count identifies continuing work, while the application total gives scale to the rate and helps prevent an outcome measure from being read without docket context.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=194 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

89.9%
Allowance Rate
n=194
+0.61σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=194
3.1
OAs to Allowance
n=124
+0.08σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=124
867 days
Time to Allowance
n=124
-2.2pp
Interview Lift
n=194
29.0%
RCE Rate
n=194
3.5%
Appeal Rate
n=194

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

80.0%
§101 Overcome
n=20
77.8%
§102 Overcome
n=36
80.3%
§103 Overcome
n=71
73.2%
§112 Overcome
n=71

Specialization & Scale

G06F, H02N, G08B
Top CPC Subclasses
20%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=194
1
Practitioners
n=194
194.0
Apps / Practitioner
n=194

Portfolio Summary

6
Total Pending OAs
3
Non-Final OAs
3
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

6
Hard (100%)
0
Medium (0%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
Multi-statute (no §101)6 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

3
Life Sciences
50% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
2
Semiconductors
33% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
17% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

60 h
Manual time on pending OAs
12 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
21 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.5 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
CLARKE, TRENT R 3 42.2% +24.7%
JOYCE, WILLIAM C 1 69.6% +16.0%
MATA, SARA M 1 67.1% +22.4%
GONZALEZ, JULIO CESAR 1 74.7% +14.5%

Hard Cases (6)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 6 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18835967 POSITIONING MODULE, AND POSITIONING APPARATUS HAVING SUCH A POSITIONING MODULE JOYCE, WILLIAM C —
18909762 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ALLOGENEIC OR XENOGENEIC USE OF ALPHA 2M MOLECULES IN TREATING MEDICAL CONDITIONS CLARKE, TRENT R —
18909731 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR AGGREGATION AND AUTOLOGOUS USE OF ALPHA 2M MOLECULES TO TREAT RESPIRATORY CONDITIONS CLARKE, TRENT R —
18561928 POSITIONING DEVICE AND METHOD FOR OPERATING SUCH A POSITIONING DEVICE MATA, SARA M —
18275974 PRELOAD DEVICE AND DRIVE DEVICE COMPRISING A PRELOAD DEVICE GONZALEZ, JULIO CESAR —
18215498 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ISOLATING ALPHA 2M MOLECULES CLARKE, TRENT R —

Interview Candidates (6)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 6 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18835967 POSITIONING MODULE, AND POSITIONING APPARATUS HAVING SUCH A POSITIONING MODULE JOYCE, WILLIAM C —
18909762 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ALLOGENEIC OR XENOGENEIC USE OF ALPHA 2M MOLECULES IN TREATING MEDICAL CONDITIONS CLARKE, TRENT R —
18909731 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR AGGREGATION AND AUTOLOGOUS USE OF ALPHA 2M MOLECULES TO TREAT RESPIRATORY CONDITIONS CLARKE, TRENT R —
18561928 POSITIONING DEVICE AND METHOD FOR OPERATING SUCH A POSITIONING DEVICE MATA, SARA M —
18275974 PRELOAD DEVICE AND DRIVE DEVICE COMPRISING A PRELOAD DEVICE GONZALEZ, JULIO CESAR —
18215498 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ISOLATING ALPHA 2M MOLECULES CLARKE, TRENT R —

Client Portfolio (2 clients)

Client (Assignee)Pending OAs
Physik Instrumente 3
REVIVAL ANIMAL HEALTH, LLC 3

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
16513
36181
28371
28311

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18835967 POSITIONING MODULE, AND POSITIONING APPARATUS HAVING SUCH A POSITIONING MODULE Physik Instrumente (Pi) GmbH & Co. Kg JOYCE, WILLIAM C 3618 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending May 05, 2025
18909762 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ALLOGENEIC OR XENOGENEIC USE OF ALPHA 2M MOLECULES IN TREATING MEDICAL CONDITIONS Revival Animal Health, LLC CLARKE, TRENT R 1651 §103§112 Final Rejection — Pending Oct 08, 2024
18909731 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR AGGREGATION AND AUTOLOGOUS USE OF ALPHA 2M MOLECULES TO TREAT RESPIRATORY CONDITIONS Revival Animal Health, LLC CLARKE, TRENT R 1651 §103§112 Final Rejection — Pending Oct 08, 2024
18561928 POSITIONING DEVICE AND METHOD FOR OPERATING SUCH A POSITIONING DEVICE Physik Instrumente (Pi) GmbH & Co. Kg MATA, SARA M 2837 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 17, 2023
18275974 PRELOAD DEVICE AND DRIVE DEVICE COMPRISING A PRELOAD DEVICE Physik Instrumente (Pi) GmbH & Co. Kg GONZALEZ, JULIO CESAR 2831 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 04, 2023
18215498 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ISOLATING ALPHA 2M MOLECULES Revival Animal Health, LLC CLARKE, TRENT R 1651 §103§112 Final Rejection — Pending Jun 28, 2023

Managing The Juhasz Law Firm, P.C.'s Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

What is The Juhasz Law Firm, P.C.'s patent allowance rate?

89.9% of resolved applications prosecuted by The Juhasz Law Firm, P.C. were allowed, across 194 applications in USPTO records.

How many office actions does The Juhasz Law Firm, P.C. average before allowance?

3.13 office actions per allowed application on average.

How many pending office actions does The Juhasz Law Firm, P.C. have?

6 pending office actions as of October 2026, for 2 clients, before 4 examiners in 4 art units.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month