Technology areas: Communications • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
8 pending office actions • 4 clients • 8 examiners • 8 art units • 0 of 8 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 11 patents granted in the last 365 days
The Law Firm of A.Q. Basit focuses on Communications, with 117 career applications and 9 pending office actions. Its resolved allowance rate is 94.52%, reflecting an allowance outcome across most of the recorded resolved applications.
Allowed matters average 2.12 office actions. The combination of that rate and the office-action measure suggests that many matters reach allowance without an extended series of examination exchanges, although the pending docket remains substantial relative to the recorded application volume. Practitioners can use the profile to separate current prosecution workload from historical resolution results when setting response priorities.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 3 (38%) |
| §103 only | 1 (12%) |
| §102 only | 1 (12%) |
| §112 only | 1 (12%) |
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 2 (25%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| ALLEN, LUCIUS CAMERON GREE | 1 | 70.8% | +29.5% |
| JEN, MINGJEN | 1 | 79.8% | +14.1% |
| RAPILLO, KRISTINE K | 1 | 28.8% | +26.9% |
| HOFFPAUIR, ANDREW ELI | 1 | 40.6% | +50.8% |
| PHAN, HANH | 1 | 88.8% | +6.5% |
| WEISS, PAMELA HL | 1 | 54.9% | +45.7% |
| SPIELER, WILLIAM | 1 | 73.6% | +9.7% |
| BURLESON, MICHAEL L | 1 | 74.3% | -6.0% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18950916 | QUANTUM TELEPORTATION NETWORK SYSTEM USING ELECTRONICALLY DRIVEN GRAPHENE WAVEGUIDES | PHAN, HANH | — |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18384332 | CONCRETE MIXTURE | WEISS, PAMELA HL | 145d overdue |
| 19088912 | DENTAL IMPLANT DETECTION SYSTEM | ALLEN, LUCIUS CAMERON GREE | — |
| 18977779 | INTELLIGENT ROBOTIC COMMUNICATION SYSTEM | JEN, MINGJEN | — |
| 18972682 | NON-INVASIVE HEALTH MONITORING SYSTEM | RAPILLO, KRISTINE K | — |
| 18957699 | AUDITORY AND OLFACTORY MAPPING SYSTEM | HOFFPAUIR, ANDREW ELI | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18384332 | CONCRETE MIXTURE | WEISS, PAMELA HL | 145d overdue |
| 19088912 | DENTAL IMPLANT DETECTION SYSTEM | ALLEN, LUCIUS CAMERON GREE | — |
| 18977779 | INTELLIGENT ROBOTIC COMMUNICATION SYSTEM | JEN, MINGJEN | — |
| 18972682 | NON-INVASIVE HEALTH MONITORING SYSTEM | RAPILLO, KRISTINE K | — |
| 18957699 | AUDITORY AND OLFACTORY MAPPING SYSTEM | HOFFPAUIR, ANDREW ELI | — |
| Client (Assignee) | Pending OAs |
|---|---|
| Abu Dhabi University | 4 |
| Zayed University | 2 |
| Ajman University | 1 |
| Waterlabs AI LLC | 1 |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2673 | 1 |
| 3657 | 1 |
| 3682 | 1 |
| 3791 | 1 |
| 2634 | 1 |
| 1732 | 1 |
| 2159 | 1 |
| 2681 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Client | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19088912 | DENTAL IMPLANT DETECTION SYSTEM | Ajman University | ALLEN, LUCIUS CAMERON GREE | 2673 | §101§102§103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Mar 24, 2025 |
| 18977779 | INTELLIGENT ROBOTIC COMMUNICATION SYSTEM | Zayed University | JEN, MINGJEN | 3657 | §103§112 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Dec 11, 2024 |
| 18972682 | NON-INVASIVE HEALTH MONITORING SYSTEM | Abu Dhabi University | RAPILLO, KRISTINE K | 3682 | §101§103 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Dec 06, 2024 |
| 18957699 | AUDITORY AND OLFACTORY MAPPING SYSTEM | Zayed University | HOFFPAUIR, ANDREW ELI | 3791 | §101§102§103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Nov 23, 2024 |
| 18950916 | QUANTUM TELEPORTATION NETWORK SYSTEM USING ELECTRONICALLY DRIVEN GRAPHENE WAVEGUIDES | Abu Dhabi University | PHAN, HANH | 2634 | §102Other | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Nov 18, 2024 |
| 18384332 | CONCRETE MIXTURE | Abu Dhabi University | WEISS, PAMELA HL | 1732 | §103§112 | Non-Final OA | 145d overdue | Pending | Oct 26, 2023 |
| 18221284 | QUANTUM DATABASE UPDATE OPERATIONS SYSTEM | Abu Dhabi University | SPIELER, WILLIAM | 2159 | §112 | Final Rejection | 16d overdue | Pending | Jul 12, 2023 |
| 17962612 | BOT PROCESSING AUTOMATION USING KNOWLEDGE BASE IN CONTEXTUAL ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE | Waterlabs AI LLC | BURLESON, MICHAEL L | 2681 | §103 | Final Rejection | 40d | Pending | Oct 10, 2022 |
IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial94.5% of resolved applications prosecuted by The Law Firm Of A.Q. Basit were allowed, across 117 applications in USPTO records.
2.12 office actions per allowed application on average.
8 pending office actions as of October 2026, for 4 clients, before 8 examiners in 8 art units.
