Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 06, 2026

The Navitas Intellectual Property Group LLC

5 pending office actions • 4 clients • 5 examiners • 5 art units • 0 of 5 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Quality Metrics (n=134 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

80.6%
Allowance Rate
n=134
+0.56σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=134
4.5
OAs to Allowance
n=50
+0.18σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=50
1155 days
Time to Allowance
n=50
+13.7pp
Interview Lift
n=134
43.6%
RCE Rate
n=134
0.0%
Appeal Rate
n=134

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

§101 Overcome
n=1 (min 20)
63.6%
§102 Overcome
n=33
65.9%
§103 Overcome
n=44
60.7%
§112 Overcome
n=28

Specialization & Scale

H01B, H02G, Y10T
Top CPC Subclasses
26%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=134
1
Practitioners
n=134
134.0
Apps / Practitioner
n=134

Portfolio Summary

5
Total Pending OAs
3
Non-Final OAs
2
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

3
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (3)Due ≤ 30 days (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (20%)
4
Medium (80%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only4 (80%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (20%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

1
Life Sciences
20% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
2
Semiconductors
40% of docket
2
Mechanical / Eng
40% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

50 h
Manual time on pending OAs
10 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
18 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.4 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
HAN, SETH 1 59.4% +26.7%
PEACE, RHONDA S 1 85.3% +12.7%
MOORE, DEVON TYLEN 1 47.3% +32.7%
HILL, STEPHANI A 1 29.6% +44.3%
POTHEN, FEBA 1 80.9% +11.3%

Quick Wins (2)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18548979 STRENGTH MEMBER ASSEMBLIES AND OVERHEAD ELECTRICAL CABLE INSTALLATIONS INCORPORATING OPTICAL FIBERS PEACE, RHONDA S 11d overdue
17436644 OVERHEAD ELECTRICAL CABLE INTERROGATION SYSTEMS AND METHODS POTHEN, FEBA

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18007688 PRODUCTION OF MAGNETIC MATERIALS HILL, STEPHANI A 42d overdue

Interview Candidates (5)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18007986 VACUUM PANEL MOORE, DEVON TYLEN 50d overdue
18007688 PRODUCTION OF MAGNETIC MATERIALS HILL, STEPHANI A 42d overdue
18548979 STRENGTH MEMBER ASSEMBLIES AND OVERHEAD ELECTRICAL CABLE INSTALLATIONS INCORPORATING OPTICAL FIBERS PEACE, RHONDA S 11d overdue
19306642 ELECTRONIC WIRELESS ORAL SUCTION DEVICE HAN, SETH 22d
17436644 OVERHEAD ELECTRICAL CABLE INTERROGATION SYSTEMS AND METHODS POTHEN, FEBA

Client Portfolio (4 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
37811
28741
37631
17351
28581

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19306642 ELECTRONIC WIRELESS ORAL SUCTION DEVICE Anew Oral Ltd HAN, SETH 3781 §103 Non-Final OA 22d Pending Aug 21, 2025
18548979 STRENGTH MEMBER ASSEMBLIES AND OVERHEAD ELECTRICAL CABLE INSTALLATIONS INCORPORATING OPTICAL FIBERS Ctc Global Corporation PEACE, RHONDA S 2874 §103 Final Rejection 11d overdue Pending Sep 05, 2023
18007986 VACUUM PANEL Cryovac AS MOORE, DEVON TYLEN 3763 §103 Non-Final OA 50d overdue Pending Dec 02, 2022
18007688 PRODUCTION OF MAGNETIC MATERIALS US Metals Refining Group, Inc. HILL, STEPHANI A 1735 §103§112Other Non-Final OA 42d overdue Pending Dec 01, 2022
17436644 OVERHEAD ELECTRICAL CABLE INTERROGATION SYSTEMS AND METHODS Ctc Global Corporation POTHEN, FEBA 2858 §103 Final Rejection Pending Sep 06, 2021

Managing The Navitas Intellectual Property Group LLC's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month