Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Thompson Patent Law Offices Pc

Technology areas: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

7 pending office actions • 7 clients • 7 examiners • 6 art units • 0 of 7 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Thompson Patent Law Offices PC has 6 pending office actions in Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals and a career application volume of 928. The profile combines current examination activity with a documented prosecution history in life-sciences technologies.

The resolved allowance rate is 87.39%, and the average is 2.22 office actions per allowance. These figures provide separate views of resolved outcomes and the examination activity associated with allowed applications.

For practitioners, the 928-application history helps frame the current docket and the reported prosecution measures. The record supports an informed review of workload and outcomes, but does not reveal the distribution of applications across biotechnology and pharmaceutical subject areas.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=928 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

87.4%
Allowance Rate
n=928
+0.51σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=928
2.2
OAs to Allowance
n=409
-0.61σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=409
836 days
Time to Allowance
n=409
+8.3pp
Interview Lift
n=928
14.5%
RCE Rate
n=928
3.0%
Appeal Rate
n=928

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

64.6%
§101 Overcome
n=65
74.6%
§102 Overcome
n=138
75.2%
§103 Overcome
n=238
77.6%
§112 Overcome
n=174

Specialization & Scale

G06Q, G06F, H04L
Top CPC Subclasses
13%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=928
1
Practitioners
n=928
928.0
Apps / Practitioner
n=928

Portfolio Summary

7
Total Pending OAs
3
Non-Final OAs
4
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

2
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (2)Due ≤ 30 days (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

6
Hard (86%)
0
Medium (0%)
1
Easy (14%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other1 (14%)
Double-patenting only1 (14%)
Multi-statute (no §101)5 (71%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

3
Life Sciences
43% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
1
Communications
14% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
2
Mechanical / Eng
29% of docket
1
Business / Other
14% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

70 h
Manual time on pending OAs
14 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
24 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.6 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
AYAD, TAMIR 1 42.3% +48.1%
POON, ROBERT 1 41.9% +26.8%
TUNGATE, SCOTT MICHAEL 1 35.6% +16.1%
PARK, HAEJIN S 1 55.1% +38.3%
NEGIN, RUSSELL SCOTT 1 55.9% +34.2%
SNIEZEK, ANDREW L 1 85.0% +8.6%
TRAN, JULIE THI 1 38.2% +70.9%

Hard Cases (6)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 6 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18333266 DETACHABLE AMPLIFIER AND SPEAKER MODULE SNIEZEK, ANDREW L 100d overdue
19074218 RECYCLABLE CONTAINER MODULAR DISPENSING SYSTEM POON, ROBERT 30d overdue
17447234 SYMPHONIC PULSED ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD THERAPY TRAN, JULIE THI 26d
18951294 AUTOMATED INSPECTION OF CLOSED PACKAGE CONTENTS AND SCANNING TO OPTICALLY COUPLED SYSTEMS TUNGATE, SCOTT MICHAEL —
18509112 Biocompatible Protein-Based Particles and Methods Thereof PARK, HAEJIN S —
18451735 COMPOSITION TRACKING OF MIXED SPECIES IN CHEMICAL PROCESSES NEGIN, RUSSELL SCOTT —

Interview Candidates (6)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 6 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19074218 RECYCLABLE CONTAINER MODULAR DISPENSING SYSTEM POON, ROBERT 30d overdue
17447234 SYMPHONIC PULSED ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD THERAPY TRAN, JULIE THI 26d
19271158 ELECTRICAL ENERGY GENERATION AND STORAGE SYSTEM WITH SUPERCONDUCITIVITY AYAD, TAMIR —
18951294 AUTOMATED INSPECTION OF CLOSED PACKAGE CONTENTS AND SCANNING TO OPTICALLY COUPLED SYSTEMS TUNGATE, SCOTT MICHAEL —
18509112 Biocompatible Protein-Based Particles and Methods Thereof PARK, HAEJIN S —
18451735 COMPOSITION TRACKING OF MIXED SPECIES IN CHEMICAL PROCESSES NEGIN, RUSSELL SCOTT —

Client Portfolio (7 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
17261
37351
16141
16861
26931
37911

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19271158 ELECTRICAL ENERGY GENERATION AND STORAGE SYSTEM WITH SUPERCONDUCITIVITY Castorena, Juanita AYAD, TAMIR 1726 DP Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 16, 2025
19074218 RECYCLABLE CONTAINER MODULAR DISPENSING SYSTEM C-Loop Packaging Sweden AB POON, ROBERT 3735 §102§103§112 Final Rejection 30d overdue Pending Mar 07, 2025
18951294 AUTOMATED INSPECTION OF CLOSED PACKAGE CONTENTS AND SCANNING TO OPTICALLY COUPLED SYSTEMS Vicente Cardenas TUNGATE, SCOTT MICHAEL §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 18, 2024
18509112 Biocompatible Protein-Based Particles and Methods Thereof Petvivo Holdings, Inc. PARK, HAEJIN S 1614 §103§112Other Final Rejection — Pending Nov 14, 2023
18451735 COMPOSITION TRACKING OF MIXED SPECIES IN CHEMICAL PROCESSES Bryan Research & Engineering, LLC NEGIN, RUSSELL SCOTT 1686 §101§103§112DP Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 17, 2023
18333266 DETACHABLE AMPLIFIER AND SPEAKER MODULE BASSMOTO LLC SNIEZEK, ANDREW L 2693 §103§112 Final Rejection 100d overdue Pending Jun 12, 2023
17447234 SYMPHONIC PULSED ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD THERAPY Haelox, LLC TRAN, JULIE THI 3791 §103§112 Final Rejection 26d Pending Sep 09, 2021

Managing Thompson Patent Law Offices Pc's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Thompson Patent Law Offices Pc's patent allowance rate?

87.4% of resolved applications prosecuted by Thompson Patent Law Offices Pc were allowed, across 928 applications in USPTO records.

How many office actions does Thompson Patent Law Offices Pc average before allowance?

2.22 office actions per allowed application on average.

How many pending office actions does Thompson Patent Law Offices Pc have?

7 pending office actions as of October 2026, for 7 clients, before 7 examiners in 6 art units.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month