Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Tope-Mckay & Associates

Technology areas: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

5 pending office actions • 4 clients • 5 examiners • 5 art units • 0 of 5 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 6 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

TOPE-MCKAY & ASSOCIATES has handled 1070 career applications, focusing on the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. The firm maintains a resolved allowance rate of 77.96 percent. Prosecution efficiency is reflected in the average of 3.58 office actions per allowance, which provides an expectation for the number of interactions required in this sector. This 3.58 figure helps clients plan for the iterative nature of the prosecution process.

The firm is currently processing 5 pending office actions. The 77.96 percent allowance rate from 1070 career applications establishes a solid track record of success in medical and mechanical patenting. These 5 pending office actions represent the firm's current focus within its established engineering practice. For practitioners, the 1070 career applications offer a substantial history of examiner interactions to analyze. The 77.96 percent allowance rate indicates a consistent ability to navigate the patent office. The 3.58 office actions per allowance metric is a useful tool for budgeting and setting client expectations in the medical device field.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=1070 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

78.0%
Allowance Rate
n=1070
+0.60σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=1070
3.6
OAs to Allowance
n=428
-0.06σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=428
1171 days
Time to Allowance
n=428
+12.1pp
Interview Lift
n=1070
30.2%
RCE Rate
n=1070
1.8%
Appeal Rate
n=1070

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

69.8%
§101 Overcome
n=63
75.4%
§102 Overcome
n=211
77.2%
§103 Overcome
n=290
83.2%
§112 Overcome
n=184

Specialization & Scale

A63H, Y10T, A61F
Top CPC Subclasses
13%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=1070
1
Practitioners
n=1070
1070.0
Apps / Practitioner
n=1070

Portfolio Summary

5
Total Pending OAs
4
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

5
Hard (100%)
0
Medium (0%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
Multi-statute (no §101)5 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
5
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

50 h
Manual time on pending OAs
10 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
18 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.4 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
GART, MATTHEW S 1 16.2% +18.9%
FULTON, KRISTINA ROSE 1 52.5% +36.0%
LOEPPKE, JANIE MEREDITH 1 55.4% +28.9%
BESLER, CHRISTOPHER JAMES 1 68.6% +41.0%
DALE, ABIGAYLE ANN 1 44.0% +70.1%

Hard Cases (5)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19051840 CONFETTI-EXPELLING TOY GART, MATTHEW S —
19052072 EXPANDABLE TOY WITH A PLURALITY OF NESTING SHELL COMPONENTS TO FORM A FIGURINE OR OTHER ITEM FULTON, KRISTINA ROSE —
18977796 RETROFIT CARTRIDGE SYSTEM WITH CONTROLLED FLOW, FOR CONVERTING TRADITIONAL URINAL INTO HYBRID LOEPPKE, JANIE MEREDITH —
18755481 Wheel Component Handling Device BESLER, CHRISTOPHER JAMES —
17827450 POWERED MASSAGE HEAD DALE, ABIGAYLE ANN —

Interview Candidates (5)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19051840 CONFETTI-EXPELLING TOY GART, MATTHEW S —
19052072 EXPANDABLE TOY WITH A PLURALITY OF NESTING SHELL COMPONENTS TO FORM A FIGURINE OR OTHER ITEM FULTON, KRISTINA ROSE —
18977796 RETROFIT CARTRIDGE SYSTEM WITH CONTROLLED FLOW, FOR CONVERTING TRADITIONAL URINAL INTO HYBRID LOEPPKE, JANIE MEREDITH —
18755481 Wheel Component Handling Device BESLER, CHRISTOPHER JAMES —
17827450 POWERED MASSAGE HEAD DALE, ABIGAYLE ANN —

Client Portfolio (4 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
36961
36751
37541
37261
37001

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19051840 CONFETTI-EXPELLING TOY Jakks Pacific Inc. GART, MATTHEW S 3696 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 12, 2025
19052072 EXPANDABLE TOY WITH A PLURALITY OF NESTING SHELL COMPONENTS TO FORM A FIGURINE OR OTHER ITEM Jakks Pacific Inc. FULTON, KRISTINA ROSE 3675 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 12, 2025
18977796 RETROFIT CARTRIDGE SYSTEM WITH CONTROLLED FLOW, FOR CONVERTING TRADITIONAL URINAL INTO HYBRID Falcon Water Technologies, LLC LOEPPKE, JANIE MEREDITH 3754 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 11, 2024
18755481 Wheel Component Handling Device Prowse Holdings Pty Ltd. BESLER, CHRISTOPHER JAMES 3726 §102§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 26, 2024
17827450 POWERED MASSAGE HEAD Thrival, LLC DALE, ABIGAYLE ANN 3700 §103§112 Final Rejection — Pending May 27, 2022

Managing Tope-Mckay & Associates's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Tope-Mckay & Associates's patent allowance rate?

78.0% of resolved applications prosecuted by Tope-Mckay & Associates were allowed, across 1,070 applications in USPTO records.

How many office actions does Tope-Mckay & Associates average before allowance?

3.58 office actions per allowed application on average.

How many pending office actions does Tope-Mckay & Associates have?

5 pending office actions as of October 2026, for 4 clients, before 5 examiners in 5 art units.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month