Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Trenner Law Firm, LLC

Technology areas: Chemistry & Materials • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

6 pending office actions • 4 clients • 6 examiners • 6 art units • 0 of 6 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 2 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Trenner Law Firm, LLC has 6 pending office actions in Chemistry & Materials. Its career record includes 733 applications, an 84.39% resolved allowance rate, and an average of 2.35 office actions per allowance.

The profile supplies historical scale, resolved outcomes, and examination-effort information in addition to current docket activity. The allowance rate applies to resolved applications, while the office-action average relates to allowed cases. Practitioners evaluating chemistry and materials counsel can use the data to examine prosecution experience and response burden, while treating the pending matters as unresolved.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=733 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

84.4%
Allowance Rate
n=733
+0.65σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=733
2.4
OAs to Allowance
n=373
-0.58σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=373
848 days
Time to Allowance
n=373
+5.4pp
Interview Lift
n=733
13.1%
RCE Rate
n=733
2.8%
Appeal Rate
n=733

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

73.7%
§101 Overcome
n=38
77.2%
§102 Overcome
n=193
78.0%
§103 Overcome
n=264
78.8%
§112 Overcome
n=231

Specialization & Scale

G06Q, Y02E, H02J
Top CPC Subclasses
6%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=733
1
Practitioners
n=733
733.0
Apps / Practitioner
n=733

Portfolio Summary

6
Total Pending OAs
3
Non-Final OAs
3
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

2
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
1
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (2)Due later (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

5
Hard (83%)
1
Medium (17%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other2 (33%)
§103 only1 (17%)
Multi-statute (no §101)3 (50%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

2
Life Sciences
33% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
4
Mechanical / Eng
67% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

60 h
Manual time on pending OAs
12 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
21 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.5 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
CHERN, CHRISTINA 1 39.1% +41.5%
LEE, BENJAMIN P 1 80.1% +16.9%
SIMMS JR, JOHN ELLIOTT 1 65.3% +12.5%
BAYNES, KEVIN J 1 74.4% +34.9%
KERSHAW, KELLY P 1 17.7% +16.0%
GONG, KRIS HANYU 1 25.0% +48.2%

Hard Cases (6)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 6 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17451108 Skin Stimulation Tool GONG, KRIS HANYU 72d overdue
17451419 Oral Supplement to Trigger Repair Of Organs KERSHAW, KELLY P 46d overdue
18789967 QUICK MOUNT SYSTEM FOR BOW AND OTHER ACCESSORIES SIMMS JR, JOHN ELLIOTT 69d
19196980 Increased-Yield Solar Energy Station CHERN, CHRISTINA —
19011817 Scent Luring Apparatus LEE, BENJAMIN P —
18775074 QUICK MOUNT SYSTEM FOR BOW AND OTHER ACCESSORIES BAYNES, KEVIN J —

Interview Candidates (6)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 6 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17451108 Skin Stimulation Tool GONG, KRIS HANYU 72d overdue
17451419 Oral Supplement to Trigger Repair Of Organs KERSHAW, KELLY P 46d overdue
18789967 QUICK MOUNT SYSTEM FOR BOW AND OTHER ACCESSORIES SIMMS JR, JOHN ELLIOTT 69d
19196980 Increased-Yield Solar Energy Station CHERN, CHRISTINA —
19011817 Scent Luring Apparatus LEE, BENJAMIN P —
18775074 QUICK MOUNT SYSTEM FOR BOW AND OTHER ACCESSORIES BAYNES, KEVIN J —

Client Portfolio (4 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
17221
36411
37111
36781
17911
37851

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19196980 Increased-Yield Solar Energy Station Envigor Energy, LLC CHERN, CHRISTINA 1722 §102§103 Final Rejection — Pending May 02, 2025
19011817 Scent Luring Apparatus Ghost Drag, LLC LEE, BENJAMIN P 3641 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 07, 2025
18789967 QUICK MOUNT SYSTEM FOR BOW AND OTHER ACCESSORIES Hamskea Archery Solutions LLC SIMMS JR, JOHN ELLIOTT 3711 §101§103§112 Non-Final OA 69d Pending Jul 31, 2024
18775074 QUICK MOUNT SYSTEM FOR BOW AND OTHER ACCESSORIES Hamskea Archery Solutions LLC BAYNES, KEVIN J 3678 §101§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 17, 2024
17451419 Oral Supplement to Trigger Repair Of Organs Johnson Consulting, LLC KERSHAW, KELLY P 1791 §103 Final Rejection 46d overdue Pending Oct 19, 2021
17451108 Skin Stimulation Tool Johnson Consulting, LLC GONG, KRIS HANYU 3785 §103§112 Final Rejection 72d overdue Pending Oct 15, 2021

Managing Trenner Law Firm, LLC's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Trenner Law Firm, LLC's patent allowance rate?

84.4% of resolved applications prosecuted by Trenner Law Firm, LLC were allowed, across 733 applications in USPTO records.

How many office actions does Trenner Law Firm, LLC average before allowance?

2.35 office actions per allowed application on average.

How many pending office actions does Trenner Law Firm, LLC have?

6 pending office actions as of October 2026, for 4 clients, before 6 examiners in 6 art units.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month