Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Trop, Pruner & Hu, P.C.

Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

21 pending office actions • 11 clients • 21 examiners • 18 art units • 0 of 21 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Trop, Pruner & Hu, P.C. has 19 pending office actions in Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering. Its career record includes 5964 applications, an 84.69% resolved allowance rate, and an average of 4.29 office actions per allowance.

The application total indicates extensive historical activity in the technology area. The resolved allowance rate provides an outcome measure, while the office-action average indicates the examination effort associated with allowed cases. The pending docket adds a current workload dimension. Practitioners can use the profile to evaluate prosecution scale and historical resolution patterns, but should not treat the pending matters as part of the resolved results.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=5964 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

84.7%
Allowance Rate
n=5964
+0.41σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=5964
4.3
OAs to Allowance
n=4685
+0.64σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=4685
1188 days
Time to Allowance
n=4685
+12.5pp
Interview Lift
n=5964
26.2%
RCE Rate
n=5964
5.0%
Appeal Rate
n=5964

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

91.2%
§101 Overcome
n=1202
83.9%
§102 Overcome
n=2072
85.1%
§103 Overcome
n=2981
86.4%
§112 Overcome
n=1554

Specialization & Scale

G06F, H04L, Y02D
Top CPC Subclasses
33%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=5964
5
Practitioners
n=5964
1192.8
Apps / Practitioner
n=5964

Portfolio Summary

21
Total Pending OAs
17
Non-Final OAs
3
Final Rejections
1
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

3
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (3)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

9
Hard (43%)
9
Medium (43%)
2
Easy (10%)
1
Unknown (5%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 only2 (10%)
§103 only7 (33%)
§102 only2 (10%)
§112 only2 (10%)
Multi-statute (no §101)7 (33%)
No statute on record1 (5%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

2
Life Sciences
10% of docket
4
Information Tech
19% of docket
2
Communications
10% of docket
3
Semiconductors
14% of docket
10
Mechanical / Eng
48% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

210 h
Manual time on pending OAs
42 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
74 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
1.8 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
CULLEN, TANNER L 1 72.3% +16.3%
BARRY, DAPHNE MARIE 1 76.0% +28.3%
HARVEY, JULIANNA NANCY 1 77.7% +19.1%
TIETJEN, MARINA ANNETTE 1 75.1% +20.7%
SIPP, AMY R. 1 71.1% +26.0%
ZIMMERMAN, BRIAN A 1 18.2% +18.5%
GAGNON, GRANT A 1 82.9% +7.7%
PINKNEY, DAWAYNE 1 80.6% +18.0%
GOLDEN, CHINESSA T 1 58.0% +4.5%
TANNER, JOCELIN C 1 72.3% +34.7%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19019714 VISION TRAINING DEVICE PINKNEY, DAWAYNE —

Hard Cases (9)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19245547 CHOKE SYSTEM WITH CAPACITY FOR PASSAGE OF LARGE DEBRIS TIETJEN, MARINA ANNETTE —
19125074 SPINAL RETRACTOR SYSTEM SIPP, AMY R. —
19055050 UNIFIED RECEIVER ARCHITECTURE FOR A PLURALITY OF WIRELESS PROTOCOLS ZIMMERMAN, BRIAN A —
19019753 VISION TRAINING DEVICE WITH REFRACTIVE INDEX-ADJUSTABLE LENS GAGNON, GRANT A —
18925951 INTELLIGENT SYNCHRONOUS DATA TRANSMISSION SCHEDULING FOR CO-EXISTENCE BILODEAU, DAVID —
18917029 ORTHOTIC SUPPORT AND STIMULUS SYSTEMS AND METHODS DOUGHERTY, SEAN PATRICK —
18818496 SYSTEM, METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR STATION-BASED TERMINATION OF A TARGET WAKE TIME SERVICE PERIOD TON, DANG T —
18736721 IV Catheter Securement Device AHMED, TASNIM M —

Interview Candidates (8)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19470878 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CONTROLLING ROBOTIC MANIPULATORS CULLEN, TANNER L —
19266319 ACTUATOR BARRY, DAPHNE MARIE —
19146293 ORTHOPEDIC ANCHOR SYSTEM HARVEY, JULIANNA NANCY —
19245547 CHOKE SYSTEM WITH CAPACITY FOR PASSAGE OF LARGE DEBRIS TIETJEN, MARINA ANNETTE —
19125074 SPINAL RETRACTOR SYSTEM SIPP, AMY R. —
19055050 UNIFIED RECEIVER ARCHITECTURE FOR A PLURALITY OF WIRELESS PROTOCOLS ZIMMERMAN, BRIAN A —
19019714 VISION TRAINING DEVICE PINKNEY, DAWAYNE —
19018495 BIOCOMPATIBLE BIOMEDICAL OCCLUSION DEVICE TANNER, JOCELIN C —

Client Portfolio (11 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
37532
28722
37712
36561
37731
37751
26861
17881
24211
26481

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19470878 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CONTROLLING ROBOTIC MANIPULATORS Bioness Medical, Inc. CULLEN, TANNER L 3656 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 30, 2025
19266319 ACTUATOR Sri Energy, Inc. BARRY, DAPHNE MARIE 3753 §112Other Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 11, 2025
19146293 ORTHOPEDIC ANCHOR SYSTEM Genesys Spine HARVEY, JULIANNA NANCY 3773 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 08, 2025
19245547 CHOKE SYSTEM WITH CAPACITY FOR PASSAGE OF LARGE DEBRIS Sri Energy, Inc. TIETJEN, MARINA ANNETTE 3753 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 23, 2025
19125074 SPINAL RETRACTOR SYSTEM Genesys Spine SIPP, AMY R. 3775 §103§112 Final Rejection — Pending Apr 28, 2025
19055050 UNIFIED RECEIVER ARCHITECTURE FOR A PLURALITY OF WIRELESS PROTOCOLS Silicon Laboratories Inc. ZIMMERMAN, BRIAN A 2686 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 17, 2025
19019753 VISION TRAINING DEVICE WITH REFRACTIVE INDEX-ADJUSTABLE LENS Edenlux Corporation GAGNON, GRANT A 2872 §101 Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 14, 2025
19019714 VISION TRAINING DEVICE Edenlux Corporation PINKNEY, DAWAYNE 2872 §103Other Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 14, 2025
19017990 MEDICAL DEVICES COATED WITH SHAPE MEMORY POLYMER FOAMS The Texas A&M University System GOLDEN, CHINESSA T 1788 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 13, 2025
19018495 BIOCOMPATIBLE BIOMEDICAL OCCLUSION DEVICE The Texas A&M University System TANNER, JOCELIN C 3771 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 13, 2025
18971076 MEDIA DISTRIBUTION AND MANAGEMENT PLATFORM USTUDIO, INC. SALCE, JASON P 2421 Other Final Rejection 81d overdue Pending Dec 06, 2024
18925951 INTELLIGENT SYNCHRONOUS DATA TRANSMISSION SCHEDULING FOR CO-EXISTENCE Silicon Laboratories Inc. BILODEAU, DAVID 2648 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 24, 2024
18917029 ORTHOTIC SUPPORT AND STIMULUS SYSTEMS AND METHODS Articulate Labs, Inc. DOUGHERTY, SEAN PATRICK 3791 §101Other Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 16, 2024
18820428 Drug Eluting Shape Memory Foam The Texas A&M University System RIETH, STEPHEN EDWARD 1759 §112Other Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 30, 2024
18818901 Biological Chord Repair System and Methods On-X Life Technologies, Inc. PELLEGRINO, BRIAN E 3799 §102 Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 29, 2024
18818496 SYSTEM, METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR STATION-BASED TERMINATION OF A TARGET WAKE TIME SERVICE PERIOD Silicon Laboratories Inc. TON, DANG T 2476 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 28, 2024
18736721 IV Catheter Securement Device Quest Medical, Inc. AHMED, TASNIM M 3783 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 07, 2024
18732504 SYSTEM, METHOD AND APPARATUS TO ENABLE WAKE-UP ON TRIGGER IN A MESH NETWORK Silicon Laboratories Inc. CHOWDHURY, FAHMIDA S 2471 §102 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 03, 2024
18618018 SHAPE MEMORY POLYMER VESSEL OCCLUSION DEVICE Shape Memory Medical, Inc. LAUER, CHRISTINA C 3771 §103 Non-Final OA 3d overdue Pending Mar 27, 2024
18601408 VOLTAGE REGULATOR TO ENABLE REDUCED MEMORY EFFECTS IN POWER AMPLIFIER Silicon Laboratories Inc. MARANO, NATASHA YOLANDA 2843 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 11, 2024
17677009 COMPRESSING INFORMATION IN AN END NODE USING AN AUTOENCODER NEURAL NETWORK Silicon Laboratories Inc. LEY, SALLY THI 2147 §103 Final Rejection 5d overdue Pending Feb 22, 2022

Managing Trop, Pruner & Hu, P.C.'s Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Trop, Pruner & Hu, P.C.'s patent allowance rate?

84.7% of resolved applications prosecuted by Trop, Pruner & Hu, P.C. were allowed, across 5,964 applications in USPTO records.

How many office actions does Trop, Pruner & Hu, P.C. average before allowance?

4.29 office actions per allowed application on average.

How many pending office actions does Trop, Pruner & Hu, P.C. have?

21 pending office actions as of October 2026, for 11 clients, before 21 examiners in 18 art units.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month