Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Van Pelt, Yi & James LLP And Luminar

Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

11 pending office actions • 3 clients • 9 examiners • 4 art units • 0 of 11 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 14 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

VAN PELT, YI & JAMES LLP AND LUMINAR has 11 pending office actions in Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems and 7120 career applications. The current docket is presented alongside the application volume associated with the profile.

The resolved allowance rate is 93.72%, with an average of 3.69 office actions per allowance. These measures offer both an outcome view and an indication that resolved applications generally require several examination events before allowance.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=7120 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

93.7%
Allowance Rate
n=7120
+0.64σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=7120
3.7
OAs to Allowance
n=4285
-0.02σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=4285
961 days
Time to Allowance
n=4285
+8.3pp
Interview Lift
n=7120
41.4%
RCE Rate
n=7120
0.8%
Appeal Rate
n=7120

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

89.6%
§101 Overcome
n=1388
85.7%
§102 Overcome
n=1813
87.2%
§103 Overcome
n=3206
86.7%
§112 Overcome
n=1304

Specialization & Scale

G06F, H04L, G06Q
Top CPC Subclasses
42%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=7120
13
Practitioners
n=7120
547.7
Apps / Practitioner
n=7120

Portfolio Summary

11
Total Pending OAs
10
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
2
Due in next 60 days
1
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Due ≤ 30 days (1)Due ≤ 60 days (2)Due later (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

7
Hard (64%)
4
Medium (36%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other1 (9%)
§103 only4 (36%)
Multi-statute (no §101)6 (55%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
2
Semiconductors
18% of docket
7
Mechanical / Eng
64% of docket
2
Business / Other
18% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

110 h
Manual time on pending OAs
22 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
38 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
1.0 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
HELLNER, MARK 2 90.4% +8.6%
EHRLICH, ALEXANDER JOSEPH 2 70.4% +46.0%
CHEN, CHIA-LING 1 52.5% +40.3%
THATCHER, CLINT A 1 80.0% +12.6%
FRITCHMAN, JOSEPH C 1 76.5% +30.2%
ZERON CERRATO, JOSEPH NATANAEL 1 — —
SLAUGHTER, ETHAN JAKOB 1 100.0% +0.0%
NASER, SANJIDA IFFAT 1 73.9% +27.5%
NICKERSON, SAMANTHA K 1 85.5% +15.6%

Quick Wins (2)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17898071 OPTO-MECHANICAL PHASE SHIFTERS IN AN ACTIVE LIGHT DETECTION SYSTEM NICKERSON, SAMANTHA K 77d
18526327 LIDAR SYSTEM WITH MULTIPLE CHANNEL COUNT HELLNER, MARK —

Hard Cases (7)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 7 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17871230 NANOSECOND PULSED WAVELENGTH AGILE LASER EHRLICH, ALEXANDER JOSEPH 23d
18333435 SMALL APERTURE OPTICAL PERISCOPE FOR LIDAR SLAUGHTER, ETHAN JAKOB 36d
17954914 Lidar Sensor with a Redundant Beam Scan NASER, SANJIDA IFFAT 36d
18960941 LIDAR RECEIVER OPTICAL LIMITER HELLNER, MARK —
18600211 DETERMINING AN AT LEAST PARTIALLY ASBORBING BLOCKAGE ON A LIDAR SYSTEM CHEN, CHIA-LING —
18409677 ANALOG TO DIGITAL CONVERSION MANAGEMENT FOR MULTIPLE RECEIVER CHANNELS IN COHERENT MECHANICAL LIDAR THATCHER, CLINT A —
18514575 SEMICONDUCTOR OPTICAL AMPLIFIER LASER DIODE SYSTEM ZERON CERRATO, JOSEPH NATANAEL —

Interview Candidates (7)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 7 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17871230 NANOSECOND PULSED WAVELENGTH AGILE LASER EHRLICH, ALEXANDER JOSEPH 23d
17954914 Lidar Sensor with a Redundant Beam Scan NASER, SANJIDA IFFAT 36d
17898071 OPTO-MECHANICAL PHASE SHIFTERS IN AN ACTIVE LIGHT DETECTION SYSTEM NICKERSON, SAMANTHA K 77d
18600211 DETERMINING AN AT LEAST PARTIALLY ASBORBING BLOCKAGE ON A LIDAR SYSTEM CHEN, CHIA-LING —
18409677 ANALOG TO DIGITAL CONVERSION MANAGEMENT FOR MULTIPLE RECEIVER CHANNELS IN COHERENT MECHANICAL LIDAR THATCHER, CLINT A —
18396594 SELF-ALIGNED TRANSCEIVER CHIP FOR COHERENT MECHANICAL LIDAR FRITCHMAN, JOSEPH C —
18381982 CALIBRATED OPTICAL PULSE GENERATION EHRLICH, ALEXANDER JOSEPH —

Client Portfolio (3 clients)

Client (Assignee)Pending OAs
Luminar 9
LUMAR TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 1
Luminartechnologies, Inc. 1

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
36456
41002
28282
36481

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18960941 LIDAR RECEIVER OPTICAL LIMITER LUMAR TECHNOLOGIES, INC. HELLNER, MARK 3645 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 26, 2024
18600211 DETERMINING AN AT LEAST PARTIALLY ASBORBING BLOCKAGE ON A LIDAR SYSTEM LUMAR TECHNOLOGIES, INC. CHEN, CHIA-LING 3645 §101§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 08, 2024
18409677 ANALOG TO DIGITAL CONVERSION MANAGEMENT FOR MULTIPLE RECEIVER CHANNELS IN COHERENT MECHANICAL LIDAR LUMAR TECHNOLOGIES, INC. THATCHER, CLINT A 3645 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 10, 2024
18396594 SELF-ALIGNED TRANSCEIVER CHIP FOR COHERENT MECHANICAL LIDAR LUMAR TECHNOLOGIES, INC. FRITCHMAN, JOSEPH C 3645 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 26, 2023
18526327 LIDAR SYSTEM WITH MULTIPLE CHANNEL COUNT LUMAR TECHNOLOGIES, INC. HELLNER, MARK 4100 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 01, 2023
18514575 SEMICONDUCTOR OPTICAL AMPLIFIER LASER DIODE SYSTEM LUMAR TECHNOLOGIES, INC. ZERON CERRATO, JOSEPH NATANAEL 4100 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 20, 2023
18381982 CALIBRATED OPTICAL PULSE GENERATION LUMAR TECHNOLOGIES, INC. EHRLICH, ALEXANDER JOSEPH 2828 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 19, 2023
18333435 SMALL APERTURE OPTICAL PERISCOPE FOR LIDAR LUMAR TECHNOLOGIES, INC. SLAUGHTER, ETHAN JAKOB 3648 §102§103 Non-Final OA 36d Pending Jun 12, 2023
17954914 Lidar Sensor with a Redundant Beam Scan LUMAR TECHNOLOGIES, INC. NASER, SANJIDA IFFAT 3645 §102§103 Non-Final OA 36d Pending Sep 28, 2022
17898071 OPTO-MECHANICAL PHASE SHIFTERS IN AN ACTIVE LIGHT DETECTION SYSTEM Luminartechnologies, Inc. NICKERSON, SAMANTHA K 3645 §103 Non-Final OA 77d Pending Aug 29, 2022
17871230 NANOSECOND PULSED WAVELENGTH AGILE LASER LUMAR TECHNOLOGIES, INC. EHRLICH, ALEXANDER JOSEPH 2828 §102§103§112 Final Rejection 23d Pending Jul 22, 2022

Managing Van Pelt, Yi & James LLP And Luminar's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Van Pelt, Yi & James LLP And Luminar's patent allowance rate?

93.7% of resolved applications prosecuted by Van Pelt, Yi & James LLP And Luminar were allowed, across 7,120 applications in USPTO records.

How many office actions does Van Pelt, Yi & James LLP And Luminar average before allowance?

3.69 office actions per allowed application on average.

How many pending office actions does Van Pelt, Yi & James LLP And Luminar have?

11 pending office actions as of October 2026, for 3 clients, before 9 examiners in 4 art units.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month