Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Walker & Jocke

Technology areas: Chemistry & Materials • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

6 pending office actions • 6 clients • 6 examiners • 5 art units • 0 of 6 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 31 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

WALKER & JOCKE has 6 pending office actions in Chemistry & Materials and 1049 career applications. Its resolved allowance rate is 91.4%, showing that most resolved applications in the recorded portfolio reached allowance. The historical application base provides context for the current docket.

The practice averages 2.33 office actions per allowance. This indicates that successful matters generally require fewer examination exchanges than a process involving prolonged prosecution, while still allowing for substantive response work. Applicants can use the profile to anticipate a relatively direct path within chemistry and materials, subject to matter-specific issues.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=1049 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

91.4%
Allowance Rate
n=1049
+0.63σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=1049
2.3
OAs to Allowance
n=755
-0.66σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=755
867 days
Time to Allowance
n=755
+6.8pp
Interview Lift
n=1049
10.4%
RCE Rate
n=1049
1.8%
Appeal Rate
n=1049

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

87.0%
§101 Overcome
n=46
88.4%
§102 Overcome
n=207
88.9%
§103 Overcome
n=332
92.3%
§112 Overcome
n=300

Specialization & Scale

G06Q, C02F, H04W
Top CPC Subclasses
12%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=1049
1
Practitioners
n=1049
1049.0
Apps / Practitioner
n=1049

Portfolio Summary

6
Total Pending OAs
3
Non-Final OAs
3
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

4
Hard (67%)
1
Medium (17%)
1
Easy (17%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (17%)
§112 only1 (17%)
Multi-statute (no §101)4 (67%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

2
Life Sciences
33% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
4
Mechanical / Eng
67% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

60 h
Manual time on pending OAs
12 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
21 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.5 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
WALRAED-SULLIVAN, KYLE 1 73.5% +30.4%
MCGUTHRY BANKS, TIMA MICHELE 1 81.6% +2.8%
WILENSKY, MOSHE K 1 75.4% +15.8%
SULLIVAN, DEBRA M 1 78.5% +17.1%
JOHNSON, CHRISTINA ANN 1 41.3% -13.4%
LAUX, DAVID J 1 65.2% +28.5%

Hard Cases (4)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18868921 MULTI-CHAMBER CLOSED STRUCTURAL ELEMENT AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING A MULTI-CHAMBER CLOSED STRUCTURAL ELEMENT WALRAED-SULLIVAN, KYLE —
18854333 METHOD OF HEAT TREATMENT OF MEDIUM- AND HIGH-CARBON ALLOY STEEL AND USE THEREOF MCGUTHRY BANKS, TIMA MICHELE —
18903252 AXIAL LOAD SUPPORT MEMBER AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURE WILENSKY, MOSHE K —
18752905 CAN CLOSING MACHINE SULLIVAN, DEBRA M —

Interview Candidates (4)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18868921 MULTI-CHAMBER CLOSED STRUCTURAL ELEMENT AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING A MULTI-CHAMBER CLOSED STRUCTURAL ELEMENT WALRAED-SULLIVAN, KYLE —
18903252 AXIAL LOAD SUPPORT MEMBER AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURE WILENSKY, MOSHE K —
18752905 CAN CLOSING MACHINE SULLIVAN, DEBRA M —
18080457 METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR INCINERATING WASTE LAUX, DAVID J —

Client Portfolio (6 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
36352
17331
37251
17421
37621

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18868921 MULTI-CHAMBER CLOSED STRUCTURAL ELEMENT AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING A MULTI-CHAMBER CLOSED STRUCTURAL ELEMENT Zieta Prozessdesign Spólka Z Ograniczona Odpowiedzialnoscia WALRAED-SULLIVAN, KYLE 3635 §103§112 Final Rejection — Pending Nov 25, 2024
18854333 METHOD OF HEAT TREATMENT OF MEDIUM- AND HIGH-CARBON ALLOY STEEL AND USE THEREOF Politechnika Warszawska MCGUTHRY BANKS, TIMA MICHELE 1733 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 04, 2024
18903252 AXIAL LOAD SUPPORT MEMBER AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURE Instytut Formy Sp. Z O.O. WILENSKY, MOSHE K 3635 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 01, 2024
18752905 CAN CLOSING MACHINE Pneumatic Scale Corporation SULLIVAN, DEBRA M 3725 §103§112 Final Rejection — Pending Jun 25, 2024
18712075 PLASTIC MATERIAL, AND METHOD FOR PROCESSING A PLASTIC MATERIAL Aixlens GmbH JOHNSON, CHRISTINA ANN 1742 §103 Final Rejection — Pending May 21, 2024
18080457 METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR INCINERATING WASTE Martin GmbH Fur Umwelt- Und Energietechnik LAUX, DAVID J 3762 §112 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 13, 2022

Managing Walker & Jocke's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Walker & Jocke's patent allowance rate?

91.4% of resolved applications prosecuted by Walker & Jocke were allowed, across 1,049 applications in USPTO records.

How many office actions does Walker & Jocke average before allowance?

2.33 office actions per allowed application on average.

How many pending office actions does Walker & Jocke have?

6 pending office actions as of October 2026, for 6 clients, before 6 examiners in 5 art units.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month