Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Ward And Smith, P.A.

Technology areas: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

6 pending office actions • 6 clients • 6 examiners • 6 art units • 0 of 6 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

WARD AND SMITH, P.A. has 6 pending office actions in Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems and 958 career applications. Its resolved allowance rate is 91.97%, showing that most resolved applications in the recorded portfolio reached allowance. The historical application total adds context to the active docket.

The practice averages 2.27 office actions per allowance. This indicates that favorable outcomes commonly follow a limited number of examination exchanges, although responses and claim amendments may still be needed. Applicants can use the profile to plan focused prosecution in transportation and mechanical systems.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=958 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

92.0%
Allowance Rate
n=958
+0.51σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=958
2.3
OAs to Allowance
n=664
-0.82σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=664
793 days
Time to Allowance
n=664
+1.9pp
Interview Lift
n=958
16.2%
RCE Rate
n=958
0.7%
Appeal Rate
n=958

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

55.0%
§101 Overcome
n=40
82.9%
§102 Overcome
n=234
84.7%
§103 Overcome
n=333
88.2%
§112 Overcome
n=204

Specialization & Scale

H01L, H10D, H10B
Top CPC Subclasses
24%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=958
4
Practitioners
n=958
239.5
Apps / Practitioner
n=958

Portfolio Summary

6
Total Pending OAs
4
Non-Final OAs
2
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
2
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (1)Due ≤ 60 days (2)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

6
Hard (100%)
0
Medium (0%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 only1 (17%)
§101 + other3 (50%)
Multi-statute (no §101)2 (33%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
6
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

60 h
Manual time on pending OAs
12 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
21 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.5 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
BAIG, SENIYA 1 — —
DEMEREE, CHRISTOPHER R 1 68.9% +14.2%
WINSTON III, EDWARD B 1 20.0% +31.3%
GILLS, KURTIS 1 58.0% +28.8%
FU, HAO 1 49.9% +24.8%
MORONEY, MICHAEL CORBETT 1 24.8% +25.0%

Hard Cases (6)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 6 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18807292 Couple-Based Digital Reproductive Health Platform System and Method WINSTON III, EDWARD B 24d overdue
18637819 Employment and/or Income Verification System and Methods FU, HAO 50d
17494570 Parcel Margin Optimization (PMO) System for and Methods of Generating and Optimizing Discounted Parcel Shipping Prices MORONEY, MICHAEL CORBETT 53d
18989157 Live Fire Training System and Method Including a Modular Live Fire Burn Room for Training Firefighters BAIG, SENIYA —
18924231 Coated Carton and Method of Making Same DEMEREE, CHRISTOPHER R —
18640227 System for Optimizing Product Distribution to Retail Outlets GILLS, KURTIS —

Interview Candidates (5)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18807292 Couple-Based Digital Reproductive Health Platform System and Method WINSTON III, EDWARD B 24d overdue
18637819 Employment and/or Income Verification System and Methods FU, HAO 50d
17494570 Parcel Margin Optimization (PMO) System for and Methods of Generating and Optimizing Discounted Parcel Shipping Prices MORONEY, MICHAEL CORBETT 53d
18924231 Coated Carton and Method of Making Same DEMEREE, CHRISTOPHER R —
18640227 System for Optimizing Product Distribution to Retail Outlets GILLS, KURTIS —

Client Portfolio (6 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
37151
37341
36831
36241
36951
36281

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18989157 Live Fire Training System and Method Including a Modular Live Fire Burn Room for Training Firefighters D.R. Reynolds Company, Inc. BAIG, SENIYA 3715 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 20, 2024
18924231 Coated Carton and Method of Making Same Inno-Pak, LLC DEMEREE, CHRISTOPHER R 3734 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 23, 2024
18807292 Couple-Based Digital Reproductive Health Platform System and Method Vie Science, Inc. WINSTON III, EDWARD B 3683 §101§103 Final Rejection 24d overdue Pending Aug 16, 2024
18640227 System for Optimizing Product Distribution to Retail Outlets Analogy Partners, LLC GILLS, KURTIS 3624 §101§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 19, 2024
18637819 Employment and/or Income Verification System and Methods Verificationprofessional, LLC FU, HAO 3695 §101§103 Final Rejection 50d Pending Apr 17, 2024
17494570 Parcel Margin Optimization (PMO) System for and Methods of Generating and Optimizing Discounted Parcel Shipping Prices Transimpact, LLC MORONEY, MICHAEL CORBETT 3628 §101 Non-Final OA 53d Pending Oct 05, 2021

Managing Ward And Smith, P.A.'s Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Ward And Smith, P.A.'s patent allowance rate?

92.0% of resolved applications prosecuted by Ward And Smith, P.A. were allowed, across 958 applications in USPTO records.

How many office actions does Ward And Smith, P.A. average before allowance?

2.27 office actions per allowed application on average.

How many pending office actions does Ward And Smith, P.A. have?

6 pending office actions as of October 2026, for 6 clients, before 6 examiners in 6 art units.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month