Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Wash Park Ip Ltd. -- Dish

Technology area: Networking & Security

7 pending office actions • 4 clients • 7 examiners • 6 art units • 0 of 7 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 2 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Wash Park IP Ltd. -- DISH handles Networking & Security matters and has 43 career applications. Its resolved allowance rate is 68.75%, while the average of 2.73 office actions per allowance indicates that successful cases generally involved multiple prosecution responses.

There are 6 pending office actions. The combination of a limited application history and unresolved work calls for caution when using the profile to assess broader prosecution patterns.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=43 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

68.8%
Allowance Rate
n=43
+0.23σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=43
—
OAs to Allowance
n=11 (min 20)
—
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=11 (min 20)
—
Time to Allowance
n=11 (min 20)
+41.7pp
Interview Lift
n=43
56.2%
RCE Rate
n=43
6.7%
Appeal Rate
n=43

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

—
§101 Overcome
n=6 (min 20)
—
§102 Overcome
n=10 (min 20)
—
§103 Overcome
n=17 (min 20)
—
§112 Overcome
n=8 (min 20)

Specialization & Scale

H04L, H04N, H04W
Top CPC Subclasses
49%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=43
0
Practitioners
n=43
—
Apps / Practitioner
n=43 (min 20)

Portfolio Summary

7
Total Pending OAs
6
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

2
Hard (29%)
3
Medium (43%)
2
Easy (29%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other1 (14%)
§103 only2 (29%)
§112 only1 (14%)
Double-patenting only1 (14%)
Double-patenting + other1 (14%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (14%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
4
Information Tech
57% of docket
1
Communications
14% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
14% of docket
1
Business / Other
14% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

70 h
Manual time on pending OAs
14 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
24 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.6 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
BATURAY, ALICIA 1 81.2% +18.2%
TILAHUN, ALAZAR 1 71.4% +14.3%
VUONG, QUOCHIEN B 1 89.7% -1.2%
MASUD, ROKIB 1 68.9% +0.3%
MAGLOIRE, ELISABETH BENOIT 1 89.7% +8.0%
HOANG, AMY P 1 72.0% +65.3%
DECKER, CASSANDRA L 1 72.4% +16.1%

Quick Wins (3)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19065923 Network Backbone Fault Management BATURAY, ALICIA —
19014815 IDENTIFYING SIGNAL INTERFERENCE SOURCES VUONG, QUOCHIEN B —
18894821 Customer Specific Network Slicing MAGLOIRE, ELISABETH BENOIT —

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18965362 Payment Verification Using Multi-Factor Authentication MASUD, ROKIB —
18541246 Auto-detect, Predict and Notify Mobile Device Users of Service Impacts DECKER, CASSANDRA L —

Interview Candidates (4)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19036469 Unique Remote Experience of Live Event TILAHUN, ALAZAR 28d
19065923 Network Backbone Fault Management BATURAY, ALICIA —
18798101 Adaptive Progressions Through Content HOANG, AMY P —
18541246 Auto-detect, Predict and Notify Mobile Device Users of Service Impacts DECKER, CASSANDRA L —

Client Portfolio (4 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
24531
24241
26451
36271
24711
24661

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19065923 Network Backbone Fault Management BOOST SUBSCRIBERCO L.L.C. BATURAY, ALICIA 2453 §112 Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 27, 2025
19036469 Unique Remote Experience of Live Event DISH NETWORK L.L.C. TILAHUN, ALAZAR 2424 §103 Non-Final OA 28d Pending Jan 24, 2025
19014815 IDENTIFYING SIGNAL INTERFERENCE SOURCES BOOST SUBSCRIBERCO L.L.C. VUONG, QUOCHIEN B 2645 §112DP Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 09, 2025
18965362 Payment Verification Using Multi-Factor Authentication Boos Subscriberco LLC MASUD, ROKIB 3627 §101§103§112 Final Rejection — Pending Dec 02, 2024
18894821 Customer Specific Network Slicing BOOST SUBSCRIBERCO L.L.C. MAGLOIRE, ELISABETH BENOIT 2471 DP Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 24, 2024
18798101 Adaptive Progressions Through Content Sling Tv HOANG, AMY P §103Other Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 08, 2024
18541246 Auto-detect, Predict and Notify Mobile Device Users of Service Impacts BOOST SUBSCRIBERCO L.L.C. DECKER, CASSANDRA L 2466 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 15, 2023

Managing Wash Park Ip Ltd. -- Dish's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Wash Park Ip Ltd. -- Dish's patent allowance rate?

68.8% of resolved applications prosecuted by Wash Park Ip Ltd. -- Dish were allowed, across 43 applications in USPTO records.

How many office actions does Wash Park Ip Ltd. -- Dish average before allowance?

2.73 office actions per allowed application on average.

How many pending office actions does Wash Park Ip Ltd. -- Dish have?

7 pending office actions as of October 2026, for 4 clients, before 7 examiners in 6 art units.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month