Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Wong Meyer Smith & Mcconnell

Technology area: Chemistry & Materials

7 pending office actions • 6 clients • 6 examiners • 6 art units • 0 of 7 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 27 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Wong Meyer Smith & McConnell operates primarily in the Chemistry & Materials technology area. The firm has managed 141 career applications, achieving a resolved allowance rate of 83.1 percent. This performance demonstrates the firm's ability to secure patent grants in chemical fields.

The firm currently has 7 pending office actions. On average, the firm experiences 3.15 office actions per allowance. This metric of 3.15 actions per allowance suggests a thorough examination process where multiple rounds of communication with the USPTO are common before reaching a final resolution.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=141 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

83.1%
Allowance Rate
n=141
+0.40σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=141
3.2
OAs to Allowance
n=59
-0.38σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=59
942 days
Time to Allowance
n=59
+8.5pp
Interview Lift
n=141
40.8%
RCE Rate
n=141
3.4%
Appeal Rate
n=141

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

—
§101 Overcome
n=5 (min 20)
56.5%
§102 Overcome
n=46
48.2%
§103 Overcome
n=56
53.3%
§112 Overcome
n=45

Specialization & Scale

B65D, G09F, F24C
Top CPC Subclasses
14%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=141
2
Practitioners
n=141
70.5
Apps / Practitioner
n=141

Portfolio Summary

7
Total Pending OAs
6
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
1
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (1)Due ≤ 30 days (1)Due later (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

6
Hard (86%)
1
Medium (14%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§102 only1 (14%)
Multi-statute (no §101)6 (86%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

5
Life Sciences
71% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
2
Mechanical / Eng
29% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

70 h
Manual time on pending OAs
14 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
24 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.6 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
KOHLER, STEPHANIE A 2 32.3% +31.4%
SWENSON, BRIAN L 1 81.0% +9.5%
CORMIER, DAVID G 1 64.6% +28.7%
BASICHAS, ALFRED 1 72.2% +3.9%
MACHNESS, ARIELLA 1 61.5% +27.4%
REYNOLDS, FRED H 1 32.9% +39.3%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19081153 Tire Barrier Device SWENSON, BRIAN L —

Hard Cases (6)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 6 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18191344 Nozzle Height Adjustment Apparatus and Method for an Extruder Assembly MACHNESS, ARIELLA 16d overdue
18658216 Natural Cheese and Method for Making Natural Cheese with Specific Texture Attributes KOHLER, STEPHANIE A 26d
18783800 Deep Cleaning Alignment Equipment CORMIER, DAVID G 62d
18516211 Gas Heat Exchanger with Baffle for a Combination Oven BASICHAS, ALFRED —
18141032 Natural Cheese and Method for Making Natural Cheese with Specific Texture Attributes KOHLER, STEPHANIE A —
18021593 Effervescent Formulation Containing Apoaequorin REYNOLDS, FRED H —

Interview Candidates (5)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18191344 Nozzle Height Adjustment Apparatus and Method for an Extruder Assembly MACHNESS, ARIELLA 16d overdue
18658216 Natural Cheese and Method for Making Natural Cheese with Specific Texture Attributes KOHLER, STEPHANIE A 26d
18783800 Deep Cleaning Alignment Equipment CORMIER, DAVID G 62d
18141032 Natural Cheese and Method for Making Natural Cheese with Specific Texture Attributes KOHLER, STEPHANIE A —
18021593 Effervescent Formulation Containing Apoaequorin REYNOLDS, FRED H —

Client Portfolio (6 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
17912
36131
17111
37621
17431
16581

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19081153 Tire Barrier Device Micetight, Inc. SWENSON, BRIAN L 3613 §102 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 17, 2025
18783800 Deep Cleaning Alignment Equipment Precision Iceblast Corporation CORMIER, DAVID G 1711 §102§112Other Non-Final OA 62d Pending Jul 25, 2024
18658216 Natural Cheese and Method for Making Natural Cheese with Specific Texture Attributes Sargento Cheese Inc. KOHLER, STEPHANIE A 1791 §103§112 Non-Final OA 26d Pending May 08, 2024
18516211 Gas Heat Exchanger with Baffle for a Combination Oven Alto-Shaam, Inc. BASICHAS, ALFRED 3762 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 21, 2023
18141032 Natural Cheese and Method for Making Natural Cheese with Specific Texture Attributes Sargento Cheese Inc. KOHLER, STEPHANIE A 1791 §103§112 Final Rejection — Pending Apr 28, 2023
18191344 Nozzle Height Adjustment Apparatus and Method for an Extruder Assembly Sargento Foods Inc. MACHNESS, ARIELLA 1743 §102§103 Non-Final OA 16d overdue Pending Mar 28, 2023
18021593 Effervescent Formulation Containing Apoaequorin Quincy Bioscience, LLC REYNOLDS, FRED H 1658 §103§112Other Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 16, 2023

Managing Wong Meyer Smith & Mcconnell's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Wong Meyer Smith & Mcconnell's patent allowance rate?

83.1% of resolved applications prosecuted by Wong Meyer Smith & Mcconnell were allowed, across 141 applications in USPTO records.

How many office actions does Wong Meyer Smith & Mcconnell average before allowance?

3.15 office actions per allowed application on average.

How many pending office actions does Wong Meyer Smith & Mcconnell have?

7 pending office actions as of October 2026, for 6 clients, before 6 examiners in 6 art units.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month