Prosecution Insights
Last updated: September 17, 2026
Application No. 16/931,436

FLEXOGRAPHIC PRINTING PLATE PRECURSOR, IMAGING ASSEMBLY AND USE

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jul 16, 2020
Examiner
COSGROVE, JAYSON D
Art Unit
1737
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Miraclon Corporation
OA Round
7 (Non-Final)
52%
Grant Probability
Moderate
7-8
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
86%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 52% of resolved cases
52%
Career Allowance Rate
67 granted / 129 resolved
-13.1% vs TC avg
Strong +35% interview lift
Without
With
+34.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 9m
Avg Prosecution
24 currently pending
Career history
161
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
67.3%
+27.3% vs TC avg
§102
24.4%
-15.6% vs TC avg
§112
7.0%
-33.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 129 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114 was filed in this application after a decision by the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, but before the filing of a Notice of Appeal to the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit or the commencement of a civil action. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114 and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the appeal has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114 and prosecution in this application has been reopened pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant’s submission filed on 6 March 2026 has been entered. Response to Arguments Applicant’s cancellation of claims 2 and 8, as well as the addition of claims 26-29, is acknowledged. Applicant’s arguments, see pages 8-16, filed 6 March 2026, with respect to the rejection(s) of claim(s) 1, 3-7, 9-20, and 23-29 under 35 U.S.C. 103 have been fully considered and are persuasive. Therefore, the rejection has been withdrawn. However, upon further consideration, a new ground(s) of rejection is made in view of US 20130228086 A1 (hereby referred to as Baldwin) and US 20120237871 A1 (hereby referred to as Zwaldo). Applicant has amended independent claims 1 and 7 to recite that the polymer is an elastomeric binder in a specified concentration and the low surface energy monomer includes a silicone moiety linked to at least one polymerizable functional group and has a specified concentration. Applicant argues that the previously cited prior art (Ali and Lin) fails to disclose or suggest such a composition. Applicant further argues that the claimed invention (per the most recent amendments) provides numerous advantageous effects, such as selective photopolymerization and development without collapse or deformation. Upon review of the disclosures of Ali and Lin, the Applicant’s arguments are found to be persuasive, as the previously cited art fails to teach or suggest an elastomeric binder having a concentration within the range recited by instant claims 1 and 7, as well as a low surface energy monomer including a silicone moiety having a concentration within the range recited by instant claims 1 and 7. Therefore, the previous rejection is withdrawn. However, a new rejection is presented in view of US 20130228086 A1 (hereby referred to as Baldwin) and US 20120237871 A1 (hereby referred to as Zwaldo), as explained below. Applicant further presents additional arguments related to the combination of Ali and Lin. Particularly, the Applicant presents several arguments related to the disclosure of Lin and the suitability of combining the teachings of Lin with the disclosure of Ali. As noted above, the rejection in view of Ali and Lin has been traversed by the most recent claim amendments. Furthermore, the rejection made in light of the Applicant’s most recent claim amendments do not rely upon the teachings of Lin, and therefore the additional arguments in regards to the disclosure of Lin are not relevant to the rejection presented below. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1, 3-7, 9-20, and 23-29 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over US 20180134030 A1 (hereby referred to as Ali) in view of US 20130228086 A1 (hereby referred to as Baldwin) and US 20120237871 A1 (hereby referred to as Zwaldo). Regarding Claims 1, 3-7, 9-20, and 23-29, Ali discloses a method for preparing flexographic printing plates. The method for forming flexographic printing plates comprises the steps of (a) providing a flexographic printing plate precursor, (b) removing the coversheet from the photosensitive layer of the printing plate precursor, (c) laminating a mask element directly in contact with the photosensitive layer, (d) imagewise exposing the photosensitive layer through the mask element, and (e) processing (i.e. developing) the exposed photosensitive layer to remove non-exposed regions (Ali, paragraph 0015-0023). The method may include removing the mask element following exposure but before the processing of step (e) is performed (Ali, paragraph 0115). The flexographic printing plate precursor comprises a backing film (i.e. a substrate), a photosensitive layer on the backing film, and a coversheet directly in contact with the photosensitive layer (Ali, paragraph 0016-0019). An adhesive layer may be present on the backing layer on the surface of the substrate opposite the surface on which the photosensitive layer is coated (Ali, paragraph 0088). The photosensitive layer comprises a thermoplastic binder, at least one monomer, and an initiator sensitive to UV radiation (Ali, paragraph 0089). The thermoplastic binder may be an elastomeric material (Ali, paragraph 0089), such as a polybutadiene latex, an acrylonitrile-butadiene copolymer latex, a polyisoprene latex, or a styrene-butadiene copolymer latex (Ali, paragraph 0090). Ali also discloses that the imageable layer composition may include various additives (Ali, paragraph 0094). The amounts of the various components of the photosensitive layer are determined based on a given utility (Ali, paragraph 0095). By performing steps (a) to (c) of Ali, a relief-forming assembly is formed according to instant claims 7 and 14. The mask element comprises a transparent polymeric carrier sheet, a barrier layer, and a non-silver halide thermally-sensitive imageable layer (Ali, paragraph 0103). The non-silver halide imageable material contains an infrared radiation absorbing compound dispersed within a polymeric binder (Ali, paragraph 0105). However, Ali does not disclose a photopolymerizable low surface energy monomer in the photosensitive layer. Baldwin teaches a flexographic printing plate and method of making the same. The flexographic printing plate comprises a first photopolymer layer containing a silicone monomer (Baldwin, paragraph 0033). The first photopolymer layer includes an ethylenically unsaturated monomer (Baldwin, paragraph 0045), a photoinitiator (Baldwin, paragraph 0046), a binder polymer (Baldwin, paragraph 0047), and a silicone source (Baldwin, paragraph 0052). The silicone source may be a silicone monomer, such as silicon p-ethyl(meth)acrylate or silicone polyester(meth)acrylate (Baldwin, paragraph 0052). Baldwin provides inventive examples using Tego Rad 2300 and MIRAMER SIP 900, which are silicon p-ethyl acrylate and silicone polyester acrylate monomers, respectively (Baldwin, paragraph 0064; see Table 1). Tego Rad 2300 is described by the instant application as a silicon material suitable for use in the claimed invention (refer to paragraph 038 of the instant application’s specification). The silicone monomer content in the photopolymer composition is between 0.1 to 2% by weight (Baldwin, paragraph 0053). The inventive examples of Baldwin include such monomers in a concentration of 1 wt% (Baldwin, paragraph 0063). However, the combination of Ali and Baldwin fails to teach the inclusion of the elastomeric binder resin in an amount ranging from 65 wt% to 90 wt% based on dry layer weight. Zwaldo teaches a flexographic printing plate precursor. The precursor includes a substrate and at least one radiation curable layer in which a flexographic relief image can be formed (Zwaldo, paragraph 0036). The radiation curable layer includes a radiation-sensitive layer containing a curable composition (Zwaldo, paragraph 0038). The curable composition comprises one or more polymeric (such as elastomeric) binders, at least one photopolymerizable monomer, and a radiation-sensitive photoinitiator (Zwaldo, paragraph 0038). The polymeric binder may be a natural or synthetic polymer of conjugated diolefin hydrocarbons, including polyisoprene, 1,2-polybutadiene, 1,4-polybutadiene, butadiene/acrylonitrile, butadiene/styrene thermoplastic-elastomeric block copolymers (Zwaldo, paragraph 0040). The content of the polymeric binder in the radiation curable layer is at least 65 weight percent based on the dry layer weight (Zwaldo, paragraph 0040). Ali, Baldwin, and Zwaldo are analogous art because each reference pertains to flexographic printing plates. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the filing date of the instant application to include a low surface energy silicone acrylate monomer in an amount between 0.1 % to 5 % (by weight), as taught by Baldwin, in the composition disclosed by Ali because the inclusion of a silicone acrylate monomer in the curable layer improves the print quality of the plate over time (Baldwin, paragraph 0030 and 0066). Furthermore, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the filing date of the instant application to use an elastomeric binder resin in an amount between 65 wt% and 90 wt% in the curable layer, as taught by Zwaldo, in the composition obtained by combining the teachings of Ali and Baldwin because such resins are soluble, swellable, or dispersible in an organic or aqueous developing solution (Zwaldo, paragraph 0040), which further improves the image quality following development. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JAYSON D COSGROVE whose telephone number is (571)272-2153. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 10:00-18:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jonathan Johnson can be reached at 571-272-1177. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JAYSON D COSGROVE/Examiner, Art Unit 1737 /JONATHAN JOHNSON/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 1734
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 23 earlier events
May 22, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
May 23, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
May 26, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
May 27, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Jan 05, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 06, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Mar 10, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Sep 03, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12736873
METHODS FOR FABRICATING AN OPTICAL WAVEGUIDE AND A DISPLAY DEVICE AND PHOTOMASK USED THEREIN
4y 8m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12699314
MULTILAYERED-REFLECTIVE-FILM-PROVIDED SUBSTRATE, REFLECTIVE MASK BLANK, REFLECTIVE MASK, METHOD OF MANUFACTURING REFLECTIVE MASK, AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE
5y 10m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12699315
METHODS OF MANUFACTURING A PELLICLE HAVING GRAPHITE LAYER
4y 4m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12693593
PATTERN FORMATION METHOD AND MANUFACTURING METHOD OF SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE
4y 4m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12693598
APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR PROCESSING SUBSTRATE
4y 3m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

7-8
Expected OA Rounds
52%
Grant Probability
86%
With Interview (+34.6%)
3y 9m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 129 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month