Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 14, 2026
Application No. 16/945,914

Retained Lock System and Method

Final Rejection §102
Filed
Aug 02, 2020
Priority
Jun 03, 2005 — provisional 60/686,695 +7 more
Examiner
BOSWELL, CHRISTOPHER J
Art Unit
3675
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Dewalch Technologies Inc.
OA Round
6 (Final)
67%
Grant Probability
Favorable
7-8
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 67% — above average
67%
Career Allowance Rate
778 granted / 1155 resolved
+15.4% vs TC avg
Strong +26% interview lift
Without
With
+26.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
23 currently pending
Career history
1174
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
30.5%
-9.5% vs TC avg
§102
48.6%
+8.6% vs TC avg
§112
14.0%
-26.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1155 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application is being examined under the pre-AIA first to invent provisions. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (b) the invention was patented or described in a printed publication in this or a foreign country or in public use or on sale in this country, more than one year prior to the date of application for patent in the United States. Claim(s) 1, 2, and 7-20 is/are rejected under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(b) as being anticipated by U.S. Patent Number 6,684,670 to Agbay et al. Agbay et al. discloses an apparatus (10) that secures first (28) and second ends (26) of a meter-sealing ring (22), the meter sealing ring for use in installing a meter (meter enclosed within cover 12) to a watt-hour meter box (14), the apparatus comprising a lock (34) having a head member (36) and a shank portion (38) comprising moveable locking members (44), the movable locking members comprising a fully retracted configuration (figures 5 and 6 show the locking members in a retracted position, where there is a void between the locking members and plunger to be capable of retracting more then what is shown), the shank portion being inserted through an aperture (60) formed in the first end of the sealing ring, and a retaining sleeve (32) capturing the shank portion, wherein the lock is permanently retained on just the first end of the sealing ring (figures 5 and 7; column 3, line 43-column 4, line 36) even when the movable locking members are in the fully retracted configuration (as best shown in figures 5 and 6), and wherein the retaining sleeve is disposed generally between the first and second ring ends (the retaining sleeve is axially aligned with the first and second ring ends), as in claim 1. Agbay et al. also discloses the shank portion further comprises a shaft (38) member with an outer surface defining a cylindrical groove (groove defined between the head member and the locking members), and wherein the retaining sleeve has an axial bore (axial bore in the sleeve; figures 5 and 7) adapted to receive at least a portion of the shaft member, the retaining sleeve adapted in surrounding relation with at least a portion of a cylindrical groove so as to slidably capture the shaft member (figures 5 and 7), as in claim 2. Agbay et al. further discloses a method for securing first (28) and second ends (26) of a meter-sealing ring (22), the meter sealing ring for use in installing a meter (meter enclosed within cover 12) to a watt-hour meter box (14), the method comprising mounting a lock (34) to the first end of the sealing ring, the lock having a shank portion (38) comprising movable locking members (44), and a head member (36), the movable locking members comprising a fully retracted configuration (figures 5 and 6 show the locking members in a retracted position, where there is a void between the locking members and plunger to be capable of retracting more then what is shown); retaining the lock with a retaining sleeve (32), wherein the lock is permanently retained on just the first end of the sealing ring (figure 5; column 3, line 43-column 4, line 36) even when the movable locking members are in the fully retracted configuration (as best shown in figures 5 and 6), and securing the lock portion to a receiving member (30) with the first and second ends held between the receiving member and head member (figure 7), and wherein the retaining sleeve is disposed generally between the first and second ring ends (the retaining sleeve is axially aligned with the first and second ring ends), as in claim 7. Agbay et al. additionally discloses the step of slidably capturing a part of the lock portion within the retaining sleeve (as shown in figures 5 and 7), wherein the lock portion is selectively guidable when securing the lock portion to the receiving member in a locked position (via the distal end of the sleeve), as in claim 8, and the step of preloading a part of the lock portion within the retaining sleeve to facilitate securing the lock portion to the receiving member without the use of a key (column 4, lines 7-10), as in claim 9, as well as the step of releasably securing the lock portion to the receiving member (locking members engaging the circumferential groove in the receiving member), as in claim 10, wherein the lock portion may be removed from the receiving member in an unlocked position, and wherein the lock portion remains retained by the retaining sleeve (figure 5), as in claim 11, and the step of releasably retaining the lock portion to the receiving member (locking members engaging the circumferential groove in the receiving member), as in claim 12, as well as the step of interengaging the lock, first and second ring ends, retaining sleeve, and receiving member as a combination (figure 7), wherein at least a portion is separable but still interengaged in the combination (figure 5), as in claim 13. Agbay et al. also discloses a system (10) for securing first (28) and second ends (26) of a meter-sealing ring (22), the meter sealing ring for use in installing a meter (meter enclosed within cover 12) to a watt-hour meter box (14), the system comprising means for mounting a lock (34) to the first end of the sealing ring, the lock having a lock portion (38) comprising movable locking members (44), and a head member (36), the movable locking members comprising a fully retracted configuration (figures 5 and 6 show the locking members in a retracted position, where there is a void between the locking members and plunger to be capable of retracting more then what is shown); and means for retaining the lock with a retaining sleeve (32), wherein the lock is permanently retained on just the first end of the sealing ring (figure 5; column 3, line 43-column 4, line 36) even when the movable locking members are in the fully retracted configuration (as best shown in figures 5 and 6), and means for securing the lock portion to a receiving member (30) with the first and second ends held between the receiving member and head member (figure 7), and wherein the retaining sleeve is disposed generally between the first and second ring ends (the retaining sleeve is axially aligned with the first and second ring ends), as in claim 14. Agbay et al. further discloses comprising means for slidably capturing a part of the lock portion within the retaining sleeve (as shown in figures 5 and 7), wherein the lock portion is selectively guidable when securing the lock portion to the receiving member in a locked position (via the distal end of the sleeve), as in claim 15, and means for preloading a part of the lock portion within the retaining sleeve to facilitate securing the lock portion to the receiving member without the use of a key (column 4, lines 7-10), as in claim 16, as well as means for releasably securing the lock portion to the receiving member (locking members engaging the circumferential groove in the receiving member), as in claim 17, wherein the lock portion may be removed from the receiving member in an unlocked position, and wherein the lock portion remains retained by the retaining sleeve (figure 5), as in claim 18, and means for releasably retaining the lock portion to the receiving member (locking members engaging the circumferential groove in the receiving member), as in claim 19, as well as means for interengaging the lock, first and second ring ends, retaining sleeve, and receiving member as a combination (figure 7), wherein at least a portion is separable but still interengaged in the combination (figure 5), as in claim 20. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed February 16, 2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. In response to the applicant’s arguments that Agbay does not disclose the retaining sleeve is disposed generally between the first and second ring ends, the examiner respectfully disagrees. The claims recite the term “generally”, which is a broad term that does not specifically limit the arrangement amongst the retaining sleeve and the first and second ring ends. Accordingly, Agbay discloses the retaining sleeve is axially aligned with the first and second ring ends, and within the extents of the ring ends, thus the retaining sleeve is disposed generally at the first and second ring ends. In regards to the argument that Agbay et al. do not disclose the lock is permanently retained, the examiner respectfully disagrees. Agbay et al. disclose the arrangement of the recess within the wall of the sealing ring is selected such that the externally applied axial force necessary to extract the lock will exceed the force required to advance the lock from its unlocked position to its locked position, preferably, the removal force would be between about 200 to 400% of the locking force (column 3, line 43-column 4, line 36). Thus, with such a substantial force require for removal of the lock from the sealing ring it is considered to be permanently fixed to the sealing ring. Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CHRISTOPHER J BOSWELL whose telephone number is (571)272-7054. The examiner can normally be reached M-R: 9-4; F 9-12. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Kristina Fulton can be reached at 571-272-7376. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CHRISTOPHER J BOSWELL/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3675 CJB /cb/ May 1, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 9 earlier events
Aug 21, 2024
Response Filed
Sep 09, 2024
Final Rejection mailed — §102
Jan 09, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Jan 14, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Feb 09, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Sep 15, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
Feb 16, 2026
Response Filed
May 04, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12698646
LOCK
2y 10m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12692727
COMPUTER SECURITY LOCKS AND SYSTEM THEREFOR
3y 7m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12692726
Anti-Theft Device
1y 10m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12687045
LOCK FOR LOCKING MULTIPLE OBJECTS
2y 0m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12680337
EXTERNAL DOORKNOB LOCKING SHROUD
2y 11m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

7-8
Expected OA Rounds
67%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+26.0%)
2y 8m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 1155 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month