Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
7 pending office actions • 3 art units • 5 examiners • 0 of 7 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 1 (14%) |
| §103 only | 1 (14%) |
| §102 only | 2 (29%) |
| Double-patenting only | 2 (29%) |
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (14%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| BOSWELL, CHRISTOPHER J | 2 | 67.4% | +26.0% |
| AHMAD, FARIA F | 2 | 76.7% | +8.2% |
| LEON MUNOZ, EDWIN A | 1 | 88.4% | +8.1% |
| NGUYEN, JUDY | 1 | 17.6% | +14.0% |
| BARRETT, SUZANNE LALE DINO | 1 | 77.3% | +8.2% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18239111 | Apparatus, System and Method for Securing an Enclosure | LEON MUNOZ, EDWIN A | — |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17984209 | Securing Apparatus and Method | NGUYEN, JUDY | 22d |
| 16983891 | ELECTRONIC LOCKING APPARATUS AND METHOD | AHMAD, FARIA F | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17984209 | Securing Apparatus and Method | NGUYEN, JUDY | 22d |
| 18642759 | Securing Apparatus and Method | BOSWELL, CHRISTOPHER J | — |
| 16945914 | Retained Lock System and Method | BOSWELL, CHRISTOPHER J | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3675 | 5 |
| 2831 | 1 |
| 2858 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18642759 | Securing Apparatus and Method | BOSWELL, CHRISTOPHER J | 3675 | §102 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Apr 22, 2024 |
| 18239111 | Apparatus, System and Method for Securing an Enclosure | LEON MUNOZ, EDWIN A | 2831 | DP | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Aug 28, 2023 |
| 17984209 | Securing Apparatus and Method | NGUYEN, JUDY | 2858 | §102§112Other | Non-Final OA | 22d | Pending | Nov 09, 2022 |
| 17087612 | ELECTRONIC LOCKING APPARATUS AND METHOD | AHMAD, FARIA F | 3675 | DP | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Nov 02, 2020 |
| 16983891 | ELECTRONIC LOCKING APPARATUS AND METHOD | AHMAD, FARIA F | 3675 | §101DP | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Aug 03, 2020 |
| 16945914 | Retained Lock System and Method | BOSWELL, CHRISTOPHER J | 3675 | §102 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Aug 02, 2020 |
| 13835722 | ELECTRONIC LOCKING APPARATUS AND METHOD | BARRETT, SUZANNE LALE DINO | 3675 | §103Other | Non-Final OA | 33d | Pending | Mar 15, 2013 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial