Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026
Application No. 16/946,340

SEMICONDUCTOR SUBSTRATE POLISHING WITH POLISHING PAD TEMPERATURE CONTROL

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jun 17, 2020
Examiner
MCCONNELL, AARON R
Art Unit
3723
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Globalwafers Co., Ltd.
OA Round
9 (Non-Final)
45%
Grant Probability
Moderate
9-10
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 45% of resolved cases
45%
Career Allowance Rate
90 granted / 202 resolved
-25.4% vs TC avg
Strong +54% interview lift
Without
With
+53.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 2m
Avg Prosecution
25 currently pending
Career history
236
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
55.1%
+15.1% vs TC avg
§102
21.7%
-18.3% vs TC avg
§112
21.8%
-18.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 202 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 7/10/2026 has been entered. Status of Claims This action is in reply to the communications filed on 7/10/2026. The Examiner notes claims 1-3, 5-9, 11-12, 14-17, 19-20, 22-24, & 26 are currently pending and have been examined; claim(s) 1, 12, & 16 is/are currently amended; and all other claims are original or previously presented. Please see the Response to Amendments and Response to Arguments sections below for more details. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1, 5-9, 11-12, 14-15, 23-24, & 26 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Crevasse et al. (EP 1175964 A2) in view of KANDA SATOKI et al. (EP 1894675 B1) further in view of Xu et al. (US 20100279435), hereinafter Crevasse, Kanda, & Xu, respectively. In reference to claims 1 & 12 (Claim Statuses are listed above in the Status of Claims section), Crevasse teaches a method of polishing a semiconductor wafer with a wafer polishing system, the wafer polishing system (100) including a preheating system (110) and a … polishing head[[s]], (150), the preheating system including a heater, (125), … the polishing heads including a plate (170) attached to the … polishing pad (160), the method comprising: heating a preheating fluid to a first predetermined temperature with the heater, (Fig 2; ¶16; 125 heats 116 to target temperature); channeling the preheating fluid through a fluid distribution tube (Fig 2; ¶16; 116/117 is channeled to 161 through a fluid distribution tube)…; applying the preheating fluid to the …polishing pad for a predetermined period of time (¶4 & ¶16; fluid is applied to 161 for predetermined pre-heating time until the temperature is at a desired level), wherein applying the preheating fluid includes: rotating the… polishing pad such that the preheating fluid covers the… polishing pad (Fig 2; ¶16-¶17 & ¶19; the entire 161 is heated by heated 116 and 117, a slurry, can be applied to 161 which would be rotating during use; therefore 160 is rotated such that 116/117 covers 160/161), and varying… a flow rate of the preheating fluid to the… polishing pad based on a measured temperature of the… polishing pad to increase a temperature of the …polishing pad to a second predetermined temperature, the second predetermined temperature being based on a thermal steady state temperature that is achieved when the wafer is polished to a targeted shape and flatness (Fig 1-2, ¶16-¶17 & ¶19; temperature sensor (140) detect a temperature of 161 to be a first temperature then controls a flow rate of 116 from 114 until the temperature of 161 is raised to a second target temperature which is the temperature that is maintained during the polishing (i.e. the temperature when the wafer achieves the target shape and flatness); it is noted that a flow rate of zero before 114 is activated to a given flow rate after 114 is activated is a varying flow rate); … placing, after applying the preheating fluid to the …polishing pad, the wafer in the wafer polishing system with the… polishing pad at the second predetermined temperature (Fig 1-2; ¶17 & ¶19; 180 is polished by 100 after the second temperature is achieved); channeling a polishing fluid through the fluid distribution tube and applying the polishing fluid to the first polishing pad (Fig 1-2; ¶16-¶17; 117 can be channeled through fluid distribution tube onto 161)…; and polishing the wafer with the first polishing pad, … and the polishing fluid (Fig 1-2; ¶16-¶17), wherein the polishing maintains the temperature of the first polishing pad at the second predetermined temperature (Fig 1-2; ¶16-¶17). Crevasse is silent in regards to a pair of polishing heads, the pair of polishing heads including a first polishing pad and a second polishing pad defining a gap therebetween for receiving the wafer, each of the polishing heads including a plate attached to the respective polishing pad, or channeling the fluid through a fluid distribution tube defined in the plate; or dynamically varying, while applying the preheating fluid to the polishing pad, a flow rate of the preheating fluid to the polishing pad based on changes in a measured temperature of the polishing pad, or applying the preheating fluid to the second polishing pad by causing at least a portion of the preheating fluid applied to the first polishing pad to fall under gravity across the gap from the first polishing pad to the second polishing pad; or channeling a polishing fluid through the fluid distribution tube and applying the polishing fluid to the first polishing pad and the second polishing pad; and polishing the wafer with the first polishing pad, the second polishing pad, and the polishing fluid. However Kanda teaches a polishing system (Fig 1 & 5; 30) for controlling polishing temperature of a pair of polishing heads (Fig 5; 32 & 36 are a pair of polishing heads), the pair of polishing heads including a first polishing pad and a second polishing pad defining a gap therebetween for receiving the wafer (Fig 5; 36 is the first polishing pad and 32 is the second polishing pad; a gap is defined between 32 & 36 for receiving a wafer), each of the polishing heads including a plate attached to the respective polishing pad (Since Crevasse teaches a plate and a pad Kanda is relied on to teach there being two polishing pads which would have the plate and pad from Crevasse); there are fluid distribution channels (76) in the polishing plate (Fig 1 & 4) applying the fluid to the polishing pad (¶29); varying, while applying the preheating fluid to the polishing pad, a flow rate of the preheating fluid to the polishing pad based on a measured temperature of the polishing pad (¶35 & ¶39-¶42; the fluid flow is controlled by valves, which can be set anywhere between fully closed to fully open, while the wafer is being polished based on temperature), and applying the preheating fluid to the second polishing pad by causing at least a portion of the preheating fluid applied to the first polishing pad to fall under gravity across the gap from the first polishing pad to the second polishing pad (Fig 1 & 5; ¶11 & ¶29); channeling a polishing fluid through the fluid distribution tube and applying the polishing fluid to the first polishing pad and the second polishing pad (¶11); and polishing the wafer with the first polishing pad, the second polishing pad, and the polishing fluid (¶11). It would have been obvious for one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified polishing system as disclosed by Crevasse to have a pair of polishing heads, the pair of polishing heads including a first polishing pad and a second polishing pad defining a gap therebetween for receiving the wafer, each of the polishing heads including a plate attached to the respective polishing pad, the fluid channeled through the a fluid distribution tube defined in the plate, and varying, while applying the preheating fluid to the polishing pad, a flow rate of the preheating fluid to the polishing pad based on a measured temperature of the polishing pad, and applying the preheating fluid to the second polishing pad by causing at least a portion of the preheating fluid applied to the first polishing pad to fall under gravity across the gap from the first polishing pad to the second polishing pad as taught by Kanda for the purpose of polishing two sides of a wafer simultaneously while controlling the temperature of the polishing pad through fluid flow rate control (Kanda: ¶11-¶12, ¶14, & ¶42). Crevasse as modified may not explicitly disclose dynamically varying, while applying the preheating fluid to the polishing pad, a flow rate of the preheating fluid to the polishing pad based on changes in a measured temperature of the polishing pad. However Xu teaches a heating system [Fig 3] for a polishing pad [14] that can be applied to preheating that has the step of dynamically varying, while applying the preheating fluid to the polishing pad, a flow rate of the preheating fluid to the polishing pad based on changes in a measured temperature of the polishing pad [Fig 3; ¶43-¶44; the temperature sensor (66) detects the temperature of the polishing surface (34) and supplies the information to the controller (68) which varies the flow rate of the fluid in tanks as it’s supplied to the polishing pad to adjust the temperature of the polishing pad to a target temperature]. It would have been obvious for one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified the fluid control system as taught by Crevasse as modified to have the step of dynamically varying, while applying the preheating fluid to the polishing pad, a flow rate of the preheating fluid to the polishing pad based on changes in a measured temperature of the polishing pad as taught by Xu for the purpose of controlling an additional parameter of the preheating process in addition to controlling the temperature of the fluid thereby give increase control over the heating process. In reference to claims 5, further comprising varying the predetermined time based on a measured temperature of the first polishing pad, (Crevasse: Fig 2; ¶16; The heated fluid is applied until the predetermined temperature has been reached, therefore the predetermined time is varied by monitoring the temperature; and the temperature sensor can be in a polishing pad (first or second)). In reference to claim 6, wherein the fluid includes deionized water. (Crevasse: ¶17; 116 can be deionized water). In reference to claim 7, wherein the fluid is substantially free of silicon dioxide, (Crevasse: ¶17; deionized water is used instead of slurry therefore it would be free of silicon dioxide). In reference to claim 8, Crevasse as modified teaches wherein varying the flow rate of the preheating fluid includes controlling the flow rate of the preheating fluid with a flow controller (Fig 1A; ¶28; the controller (150) controls the flow rate by controlling the valves, 122 & 132). In reference to claim 9, further comprising using a heater to heat the fluid to the preheating predetermined temperature, (Crevasse: ¶16; 125 heats 116). In reference to claim 11, further comprising varying a temperature of the fluid based on a measured temperature of the polishing pad, (Crevasse: ¶16-¶17; 130 controls 125 to heat 116 based on the temperature of 161). In reference to claim 14, wherein the polishing fluid comprises a slurry. (Crevasse: ¶16-¶17; 117 is slurry). In reference to claim 15, wherein friction between the first polishing pad, the wafer, and the slurry maintains the temperature of the first polishing pad at the second predetermined temperature, (Crevasse: ¶16-¶17 & ¶19; the wafer temperature is maintained by the polishing process of the wafer contact with the polishing pad and slurry fluids on the pad (or the first and second pads with the double sided polishing system taught by Kanda)) In reference to claim 23, wherein the second predetermined temperature is approximately equal to the thermal steady state temperature (Crevasse: ¶16-¶17 & ¶19; 160/161 is raised to the second temperature which is the steady state temperature that the wafer will be polished at; It is noted that "approximately equal" per Applicant's Specification ¶34 as being +/- 0.5 Degrees C). In reference to claim 24, wherein the wafer polishing system includes a first reservoir containing the preheating fluid and a second reservoir containing the polishing fluid, the preheating fluid being channeled from the first reservoir to the first polishing pad and the polishing fluid being channeled from the second reservoir to the first polishing pad (Crevasse: Fig 1-2; 111 contains 116 while 112 contains 117 and both 116 & 117 are channeled from their respective reservoirs to 160/161). In reference to claim 26, wherein varying the flow rate of the preheating fluid includes increasing the flow rate of the preheating fluid from a first non-zero flow rate to a second non-zero flow rate (Crevasse: ¶16; if the temperature during preheating is below the desired temperature the temperature controller can increase the heat or increase the preheating fluid flow rate by adjusting the valves taught by Kanda to increase the heating rate of the polishing pads). Claims 2-3, 16-17, & 19-20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Crevasse in view of Kanda further in view of Xu further in view of Maruyama et al. (US 20170239778), hereinafter Maruyama. In reference to claims 2 and 17, Crevasse as modified is silent in regards to wherein the first predetermined temperature is calculated based on the second predetermined temperature and the polishing pad temperature. However Maruyama teaches a preheating method and system wherein the first predetermined temperature is calculated based on the second predetermined temperature and the polishing pad temperature, (¶63, ¶80-¶82 & ¶84; The fluid is heated to a given temperature based on the type of fluid and the higher the fluid temperature the faster the temperature of the polishing pad can be raised). It would have been obvious for one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified the preheating method as taught by Crevasse as modified to have the first predetermined temperature is calculated based on the second predetermined temperature and the polishing pad temperature as taught by Maruyama for the purpose of being able to heat different fluids used for cooling/heating to different temperatures based on the type of fluid and the higher the fluid temperature the faster the temperature of the polishing pad can be raised (Maruyama: ¶63, ¶80-¶82 & ¶84). The rejection of claim 16, which 17 depends from is below. In reference to claims 3, Crevasse as modified is silent in regard to wherein the polishing pad temperature is maintained between 42 °C and 43 °C. However, Maruyama further teaches wherein the polishing pad temperature is maintained between 42 °C and 43 °C (Maruyama: Fig 15-17 & 21; ¶80-¶82 & ¶85-¶86; the polishing pad temperature can be varied and maintained between 40 to 60 Degree C). It would have been obvious for one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified the preheating method as taught by Crevasse to have the polishing pad temperature be maintained between 42 °C and 43 °C as taught by Maruyama for the purpose of being able to heat different fluids used for cooling/heating to different temperatures based on the type of fluid and the higher the fluid temperature the faster the temperature of the polishing pad can be raised (Maruyama: ¶63, ¶80-¶82 & ¶84). In reference to claim 16, it is rejected for the same structure that is referenced in claims 1 & 12. The difference in claim 16 is "a controller (Maruyama: ¶59; 40) that controls the preheating system and the polishing head, wherein the controller is programmed to" execute the method as described in claims 1 & 12. It would have been obvious for one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified the polishing system as taught by Crevasse as modified to have a controller (Maruyama: ¶59; 40) that controls the preheating system and the polishing head as taught by Maruyama for the purpose of having an overall controller which controls heating/cooling system and the polishing system to maintain a desired temperature for polishing a wafer (Maruyama: Abstract & ¶59-¶60) Therefore claim 16 is rejected for the same reasons as claims 1 & 12. In reference to claim 19, wherein the preheating system further comprises a polishing pad temperature sensor (Crevasse: 240) for measuring a polishing pad temperature, (Crevasse: ¶15-¶16). In reference to claim 20, Claim(s) 20 recite(s) the same, similar limitations as those addressed for claim(s) 8. Claim(s) 20 is/are therefore rejected for the same reasons set forth for claim(s) 8. . Claims 22 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Crevasse in view of Kanda further in view of Xu further in view of Maruyama further in view of YI JAE HWAN et al. (KR 101229972), hereinafter Yi. In reference to claim 22, Crevasse as modified is silent in regards to wherein the second plate further includes an additional fluid distribution tube for channeling the preheating fluid from the preheating system to the second polishing pad, wherein the controller is further configured to cause the preheating system to apply the preheating fluid to the second polishing to raise a temperature of the second polishing pad to the second predetermined temperature. However Yi teaches a double pad polishing device which further comprising wherein the second plate further includes an additional fluid distribution tube for channeling the preheating fluid from the preheating system to the second polishing pad (Fig 7; both polishing pads have fluid distribution tubes from the same fluid sources and combined with Crevasse would have the preheating or polishing fluid supplied to the second polishing pad), wherein the controller is further configured to cause the preheating system to apply the preheating fluid to the second polishing to raise a temperature of the second polishing pad to the second predetermined temperature. (The combined polishing device with Maruyama as modified per ¶60 of Maruyama would have 40 direct 42 & 56 to direct temperature controlling liquid to channels in a single or double polishing pad). It would have been obvious for one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified the polishing system as taught by Crevasse as modified to have wherein the second plate further includes an additional fluid distribution tube for channeling the preheating fluid from the preheating system to the second polishing pad, wherein the controller is further configured to cause the preheating system to apply the preheating fluid to the second polishing to raise a temperature of the second polishing pad to the second predetermined temperature as taught by Yi for the purpose of uniformly distributing slurry on a surface between a polishing pad and a wafer (Yi: Pg4:¶8 of the translation). Response to Arguments 35 U.S.C. 103 Rejection Applicant's arguments, see Pages 8-116, filed 7/10/2026 have been fully considered but are moot in light of the new grounds of rejection. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to AARON R MCCONNELL whose telephone number is (303)297-4608. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Thursday 0700-1600 MST [0900-1800 EST] 2nd Friday 0700-1500 MST [0900-1700 EST]. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Brian Keller can be reached on (571) 272-8548. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /AARON R MCCONNELL/Examiner, Art Unit 3723 /JOEL D CRANDALL/Examiner, Art Unit 3723
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 24 earlier events
Nov 26, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Feb 26, 2026
Response Filed
Apr 10, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103
Jun 24, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Jun 24, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Jul 10, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Jul 20, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Aug 26, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12746635
TOOL
4y 0m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12740851
ORAL HEALTH DEVICE FOR SIMULTANEOUSLY BRUSHING THE SURFACES OF AND CLEANING THE INTERPROXIMAL SPACES BETWEEN A USER’S TEETH
1y 10m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12721705
PROCESSING BLOCK, HOLDER FOR PROCESSING BLOCK, AND METHOD OF POSITIONING PROCESSING BLOCK
4y 2m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12708536
DEVICE AND METHOD OF RADIALLY COLLAPSING MEDICAL DEVICES
3y 8m to grant Granted Aug 18, 2026
Patent 12695066
MOVEABLE EDGE RINGS WITH REDUCED CAPACITANCE VARIATION FOR SUBSTRATE PROCESSING SYSTEMS
4y 5m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

9-10
Expected OA Rounds
45%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+53.6%)
3y 2m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 202 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month